Skip to comments.
Schwarzenology
SacBee ^
| October 9, 2003
| Daniel Weintraub
Posted on 10/09/2003 9:55:08 AM PDT by Weimdog
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:59:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Trying to divine Gov.-elect Schwarzenegger
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: budgetmess; cleanup; deficit; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
1
posted on
10/09/2003 9:55:08 AM PDT
by
Weimdog
To: Weimdog
I think he's right. I think this is very likely to be what Arnold is going to do.
To: All
|
Keep Our Republic Free
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com |
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER and say THANKS to Jim Robinson! IT'S IN THE BREAKING NEWS SIDEBAR THANKS! |
3
posted on
10/09/2003 10:13:49 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Weimdog
During the campaign, Arnold said that he would be applying to Bush for federal funds to help offset the costs of illegals in our state.
Afterall, our nations borders are not being protected and that is a federal duty. Yet, it is the southwestern states that are bearing the enormous financial burden of education, welfare, housing, medical incarceration etc. of illegals.
To: Weimdog
To: LibertyAndJusticeForAll
I agree. (Sure, we benefit from reduced labor cost. Sure, most illegals work hard and pay many as-you-go taxes such as sales taxes and, through rent payments to landlords, many property taxes too. But those economic pluses are dwarfed by the marginal added COSTS involved.)
I just scanned this article, but overall I like it, esp. the spending cap!
Next: constitutional-amendment initiative to DISMANTLE THE DEMOCRAT GERRYMANDER! :)
6
posted on
10/09/2003 10:31:37 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: pogo101
If every governor applied this kind of fiscal pressure on the federal government, maybe they would begin to protect our borders.
And since 9/11, there has been a tidal wave of illegals pouring over the border. Any one of them could have been a terrorist carrying whatever he wanted with him.
To: William McKinley; Dog Gone; Carry_Okie; Rabid Republican
He should also do something about the $8 billion gap since that's in next year's budget. I think I could support a bond to roll over the accumulated Davis hangover if there was otherwise no deficit this year, and tough measures were put in place to prevent this from happening again.
If he can take the bold budget-cutting steps now, by three years from now they will be forgotten, and he'll be re-elected easily.
D
To: daviddennis
I think I could support a bond to roll over the accumulated Davis hangover if there was otherwise no deficit this year, and tough measures were put in place to prevent this from happening again. IIRC, it's already been done and we're on an (illegal) credit card rollover already. Then there's that Prop 13 Constitutionally-required-balance-the-budget-and-ask-the-voters-to-borrow-money thingy.
9
posted on
10/09/2003 10:44:39 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(California: Where government is pornography every day!)
To: Weimdog
But now that he has been elected governor and I am trying to assess where he is going from here, I find myself coming back to his many statements during the campaign that gave us broad hints about the direction he intended to take. Because this makes more sense to the media then just waiting to hear what he's going to do.
To: Carry_Okie
The article discussed all of this- including why what 'has already been done' looks like it is being undone by the courts, and what can be done about it, and how Arnold could possibly try to make it politically palatable to borrow through this.
To: Weimdog
Arnold is a very smart man! "Being vague" on his economic policies keeps the Liberals off balance, and reduces them to a defensive position of reacting to Arnold's policies. If Arnold stays on the offense it increase his chances of beating any opposition that may arise.
To: William McKinley
Why "borrow through" when the fat is there? I don't accept some of the premises in the article because the devil is in the details of how that money is spent. Half the education money never gets to a classroom.
13
posted on
10/09/2003 10:58:49 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(California: Where government is pornography every day!)
To: daviddennis
California could make a case that money spent on services, such as medical treatment, for indigent illegals should be reimbursed by the Federal government, since the borders are a Federal responsibility. That would save California about $4 billion per year, if the numbers I've heard are accurate.
Weintraub's speculation here sounds reasonable. The number may be significantly higher than $20 billion, though. I'd be surprised if it's that low.
14
posted on
10/09/2003 10:59:08 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Destructor
"Being vague" on his economic policies keeps the Liberals off balance, and reduces them to a defensive position of reacting to Arnold's policies. Until it comes time to do something.
15
posted on
10/09/2003 10:59:39 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(California: Where government is pornography every day!)
To: William McKinley
Well, maybe. But, there's a wrinkle. Article 2, section 8 of the state constitution states that: " (d) An initiative measure embracing more than one subject may not
be submitted to the electors or have any effect."
So, there would have to be, at minimum, two separate measures: one for the bond, one for the spending cap. Lots of opportunity for monkey business here.
To: Weimdog
Reality strikes Herr Davis and other California Rats on 7 October 2003!
17
posted on
10/09/2003 12:19:47 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Fight Liberalism 24/7/365 for only 17 cents / day. Donate $5 monthly to Free Republic.)
To: absalom01
great point.
To: Carry_Okie
"Until it comes time to do something."
Congratulations on missing the point completely! The point is that Arnold doesn't tip his hand UNTIL he is ready to act! Keep those damned Liberal guessing!
To: Destructor
I didn't miss the point. They won't either.
20
posted on
10/09/2003 1:59:28 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(California: Where government is pornography every day!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson