Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Clueless About Clinton Curse
Rush Limbaugh .com ^ | 10/08/03 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 10/08/2003 4:46:28 PM PDT by Libloather

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Libloather

Shhhhh!!!

dont wake up those Dems, they think Clinton's a winner
61 posted on 10/08/2003 11:10:41 PM PDT by WOSG (CALI RECALL VICTORY ! POWER TO THE PEOPLE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
That is a good plan. Find a segment and get them out to vote.

you know they break down vote by race, age, income and sex.
but if you did it by race *and* sex *and* income, I'd bet the non-welfare-recipient white male vote is about only 35% for Hillary.

My question is to that 35%: What the h*** are you thinking man???
62 posted on 10/08/2003 11:14:21 PM PDT by WOSG (CALI RECALL VICTORY ! POWER TO THE PEOPLE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Your One Stop Resource For All The California Recall News!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

63 posted on 10/08/2003 11:23:03 PM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic
When the Dem's stood behind Bubba during the impeachment process, they created the myth that he was a great man hounded by the VRWC. That myth still plays well with many in the Dim's base (especially black voters), but it gave both Clinton's the ultimate 'get out of jail free' card.

Now either is free to do or say whatever they want, no matter how it effects the party, and no Dim will dare critize them in public. Both are still able to raise money for the party (another reason to give them free rein) and can energy the party base. Unfortunately (for Dim candidates), they are equally good at energizing the opposition.

64 posted on 10/09/2003 12:19:43 AM PDT by Sapper26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Republic
Hey, nice deconstruction of the Clinton Curse.

My take is that greedy Dumbocrats saw the Clintons as their meal ticket. Nothing more, nothing less. The conniving Clintons lived up to the image. They would do anything to get into power and do anything to stay there. The list is long and lurid......they pardoned criminals, sold coffee at the WH, gave every special interest our tax money and unlimited access to our government. They kissed the butts of every hyphenate that walked and could vote, etc, etc, ect, and so on and so forth, ad infinitum, ad nauseaum.

Not to worry. Truth will out, and what goes around, comes around.

65 posted on 10/09/2003 4:03:40 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
Do you approve of your scenario?

It does not matter whether or not I approve of the scenario; Bill and Hillary! getting knifed in the back by the first opportunistic 'Rat smart enough to do the deed, probably Howard Dean. I think that it is inevitable.

The Clintons are weakened by yet another loss in California. People are waking up to the fact that they are poison. And the one sound you always hear in Democrat circles, constant and in the backround like crickets on a summer evening, is the sharpening of knives. Some 'Rat is going to realize they are better off opposing the Clintons than supporting them, and that the only way to advancement is over their bodies. At that point, the deed will be done.

Watch Howard Dean closely.

As for my feelings, they are mixed. On the one hand, it will mean the rejuvenation of the Democrat party and they will be a much more potent force in the future, say five years down the line. OTOH, it will be deeply satisfying to see the Clintons finally taken down by one of their own. Also, the elimination of any possibility the Hillary! might someday be President is a benefit not to be underestimated.

So on balance, I say, "Go for it, Howard!"

66 posted on 10/09/2003 6:33:01 AM PDT by gridlock (Remember: PC Kills!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Well .. I don't think Dean is that put off by the Clintons. After all, Dean openly stated he was getting political advice from Hillary

Hey, these are 'Rats were talking about. It has nothing to do with like or dislike, or whether or not they have been allies in the past. It has to do with whether or not it would be beneficial to Dean if he were to knife the Clintons in the back.

I think it would and I think he will. This Weasely Clark thing will just push him over the edge, and he will realize that the only way to win is to defeat the Clintons. The Clinton's support in the 'Rat Party is a mile wide and an inch deep. They can be taken.

67 posted on 10/09/2003 6:39:50 AM PDT by gridlock (Remember: PC Kills!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cwboelter
"They don't trust the people or elections, which is why they want the power to mandate things rather than go through the legislative process."

I wouldn't say they don't trust the people, so much as have deep-rooted contempt for them. One of the fundamental assumptions you must make as a liberal is that you are better than everyone else. More intelligent, more moral, more compassionate. Otherwise, they would be like you.

It's your calling as a liberal to drag the unwashed Archie Bunker masses to the enlightened Utopia of the socialist dream. Whether it be accomplished by brainwashing, bribery or at gunpoint is irrelevant. The key is to have control, and the power to force people to be more like you.

68 posted on 10/09/2003 6:40:33 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
but if you did it by race *and* sex *and* income, I'd bet the non-welfare-recipient white male vote is about only 35% for Hillary.

My question is to that 35%: What the h*** are you thinking man???

They're thinking about how their wife is going to take away their keys to the Volvo if they argue the point.

69 posted on 10/09/2003 6:43:26 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Let's give the Clintons SOME credit for sonething good that happened Tuesday.....PUKE POLITICS is OVER!! The stupid liberals are even on to what the Dems and the media do now!!! HUGE VICTORY there for the fall of Puke Politics!
70 posted on 10/09/2003 6:52:13 AM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Sapper26
Oh yeah-on both your posts.

reminds of that old adage we are all so sick of (LOL), that being:

'Oh what a wicked web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.'

The dems have woven a wicked web, culminating in their own mired attachment to a very pathetic ex-rapist and his blindly ambitious wife.

The truth is outing, but like Sapper mentions, many don't care about the truth. That is where prayers come in...because we love our nation and want all eyes opened, including our own.

The klintons seem like a curse upon our nation to me, and I dunno about you two, but like Sapper mentioned, paraphrased, the klintons energize their enemies as much, if not more, than they energize their base. Which stirs in me the absolute dedication to fight hillary klinton with everything I have should she decide to EVER inhabit our White House once again.

It will not happen. We have enough power right here on FR to be a formidable force, like perhaps we have never been before, should she even attempt this coop.

Sean Hannity mentioned yesterday that she may have back doored an application to run for our presidency in 2004. I hope this is explored and explained.

This woman does not know that unlike New Yorkers, our nation WILL NOT allow this woman to run without direct and brutal questioning-everywhere she goes. Everywhere.

And we will hold the press accountable this time. Oh yeah.

I have no doubt.

71 posted on 10/09/2003 8:27:30 AM PDT by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
The Senate has been our weak link for years. We need a solid majority plus a guy like Santorum as our leader. I agree we need leadership more like DeLay and less like Lott.
72 posted on 10/09/2003 9:27:10 AM PDT by colorado tanker (Oddball: "A . . . tank can give you an . . . edge.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
"defeat the clintons"

Whoa! You think Dean actually might believe he could "defeat" the clintons ..?? Well .. I guess we'll see!
73 posted on 10/09/2003 12:21:43 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Just you wait. When it gets a little closer to nut-crackin' time, Dean is going to let them have it with both barrels (to our friends at the USSS, this is a figure of speech). He will take them down and ride the crest of that wave through the early primaries. For the first four or five weeks, Dean will be the one who took on Bubba and survived. After that, everyone will pile on, but by that time, Dean has it sewed up.

Or he can be the one who went after the Clintons and got squashed like a bug. Result is he loses. But he loses by doing nothing, so he might as well take the shot.

Plus, if he is the first one to make a move, even if he loses, in a few years he looks like a Prophet...
74 posted on 10/09/2003 12:39:17 PM PDT by gridlock (Remember: PC Kills!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: CodeMonkey
"So now that the Republicans are the majority party when can we expect to see fundamental overhauls in issues like taxation, gun control, economic regulations, vouchers and other important issues?"

Not that you'd notice (being a 3rd Party partisan and all), but since Bush won we've cut federal income taxes twice (down to $45 per year for a family of 4 earning $40k), killed the estate tax, killed the double-tax on dividends (as of 1/1/04), repealed the federal restrictions on arming pilots with handguns, and we're putting in our first federal pilot program for private school vouchers in Washington, D.C.

75 posted on 10/09/2003 12:45:28 PM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Well .. it is possible that Dean could cause a few more dems to wake up to what the Clintons have actually done to the dem party. That might be a good thing .. for everybody but Dean.
76 posted on 10/09/2003 1:16:50 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
A Prophet is honored everywhere but in his own land...

But there is always 2008 to think about. I can think of worse things for Dean to be known for than being the man who saved the Democrat party from the Clintons.

Eventually the 'Rats are going to wake up and see what a disaster the Clintons have been. The one who is out in front of that movement stands to gain tremendous power when the vacuum that was once occupied by Bubba and Hillary! opens up.

77 posted on 10/09/2003 1:27:59 PM PDT by gridlock (Remember: PC Kills!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Liz
"In 2002 Bill (and Hil's) campaigning had a hugely negative effect on candidates and caused unimaginable losses for the Dims including the Senate majority. Yet they still drag out this has-been to campaign. Will they never learn?"

A significant number of media members reached their current employment level during X-42(i)'s term of office. That is, he was there when they got to Washington. In addition to their group being almost exclusively Dems to begin with, they also loved all the goodies and perks and the honor of being in the DC Cocktail Party A-List - and now that things are different, they miss the days that used to be. So the MEDIA is a big part of why X-42(i) is still hanging around. If the media didn't cover him, he'd pretty much go away (and probably self-destruct in a few years). But the media is as responsible as anyone for the X-42's continued presence. They are truly lapdogs.

Everyone for whom X-42(i) has campaigned since his leaving office has LOST - but no one in the media has noticed, at least on air or in print. They're either oblivious or in De Nile.

Michael

78 posted on 10/09/2003 2:01:03 PM PDT by Wright is right! (Never get excited about something by the way it looks from behind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Wright is right!; Grampa Dave; Flurry
Everyone for whom X-42(i) has campaigned since his leaving office has LOST.

Would make a great slogan on a tee-shirt to wear at rallies.

79 posted on 10/09/2003 3:10:39 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Liz
I will donate money to Bill to cover his expenses to campaign for every dem out there. Where do I send my dollar.
80 posted on 10/09/2003 3:12:03 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (I have over 41 years experience, at acting 8 years old. That will be 42 years in Jan 04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson