Skip to comments.
Hate-fest against Rush at Slate.com
Slate ^
| Slate
Posted on 10/06/2003 2:43:50 PM PDT by El Conservador
One example, equating Rush to a Klansman:

TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: achillwind; cartoons; espn; mediabias; pilingon; racebaiting; racialdivision; rush; rushbashing; rushlimbaugh
The rest... well, go see for yourself...
To: All
|
Donate to Free Republic, and Save Larry The Lobster!!!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
10/06/2003 2:45:20 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: El Conservador
Maybe Slate should get that stawlart of the Democrat Party, Senator Robert "Sheets" Byrd to decry Limbaugh's "racism" and perhaps tell us whether or not Limbaugh is a white n.....
To: El Conservador
The media has been trying to pin that hood on rush for years...I won't work this time either....If you look real close at the hood, the tag says " Property of R.Byrd"...
To: El Conservador
Let them play and waste their time. It about time we see the left exhibit some humor. We still own talk radio.
5
posted on
10/06/2003 2:53:26 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
To: El Conservador
The difference between Rush and the Klan is, among other things, that the ACLU always goes to court to defend the Klan's right to free speech.
If the cartoonist had actual guts instead of the usual pack journalist weasel instinct, he'd have shown the appropriate headgear for Rush - the muzzle that the rest of the so-called free press would like to put on him.
6
posted on
10/06/2003 2:54:10 PM PDT
by
Argus
((Ninety-nine and forty-four one-hundredths percent Pure Reactionary))
To: El Conservador
I thought Slate was (still) on the verge of going under...what's keeping them?
To: swilhelm73
"Senator Robert "Sheets" Byrd"
...It's proper when referring to a United States Senator to put his political affiliation and state behind his name, like this :Senator Robert "Sheets" Byrd (KKK-W.Va.)
8
posted on
10/06/2003 3:09:05 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Don't squat with your spurs on.)
To: El Conservador
Notice that McNab is the only one with a serious helmet. I'm outraged, I tell you! That's racist! I'm ... I'm so... so... MIFFED! I think I'll kick a can or something.
To: doug from upland
"We still own talk radio." We still own the best laughs, too. Leftists make the best props!
To: El Conservador
Limbaugh's thesis about the media coddling McNabb because he is black is horsehockey. He should never have said it because it's dumb.
11
posted on
10/06/2003 3:37:36 PM PDT
by
beckett
To: El Conservador
I've never been a hugh Rush fan. I've been supportive of his results oriented style but alway's tepid toward being a "fan".
Now what they are doing to the man on University of Wisconsin based NPR talk radio today is just sickening. They have attributed just about every possible crime against the PC crowd and every race in general. I've listened to Rush for about 15 years now for about five hours a week. I have never heard him say or do the things of which they are attributing to him today. They are a pack of diseased vermin.
Eventually I heard a caller who taught me something. What bothers them is that Rush mobilizes or motivates the right wing to vote in what they call "unfair and disproportionate numbers". What they are implying is that elections should be held based on registration data. In other words it's not possible for conservatives to elect a person to office in any state which democrats outnumber republicans. If conservatives win in such a situation it's because of "unfair voting trends".
I found this sobering. In the eyes of a liberal, any state which chooses a conservative candidate only does so because of the "Rush Limbaugh's of the world" and that their victory is "not mandated by the voters but orchestrated by Rush Limbaugh types".
12
posted on
10/06/2003 3:42:06 PM PDT
by
blackdog
("This is everybody's fault but mine")
To: El Conservador
We have our own "hate fest" people here on FR on Rush threads.
13
posted on
10/06/2003 3:50:04 PM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: GiveEmDubya
I thought Slate was (still) on the verge of going under...what's keeping them?You're thinking of Salon, not Slate.
14
posted on
10/06/2003 3:54:04 PM PDT
by
Timesink
To: El Conservador
That's really disgusting. Typical Dim thinking though.
15
posted on
10/06/2003 3:59:13 PM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(Arnold for Governator! Help Bring California Back!)
To: El Conservador
No thank you.
My humor hunger ain't that bad. Let somebody else give them the hits.
16
posted on
10/06/2003 4:01:50 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: El Conservador
I can find enough Rush bashing on FR, I don't need to go to Slate for that crap.
17
posted on
10/06/2003 4:16:20 PM PDT
by
weegee
To: Timesink
""You're thinking of Salon, not Slate.""
But can't they BOTH go under, pleeeeeease?
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson