Skip to comments.
REPEATING HISTORY IN CA
THE LOGICAL VIEW ^
| 10/4/03
| MARK A SITY
Posted on 10/04/2003 2:39:15 AM PDT by logic101.net
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: logic101.net
Good thoughts, but a waste of time and bandwidth if you are expecting any converts.
Tom's supporters will go down with the Titanic, ram-rod straight, hand salute, with nary a regret or qualm. And if you dare criticize their sacred loyalty, stand by for the wrath of God.
The way they look at it, it is Arnold's duty to get out of the race and hand all of his loyal supporters over to the true believer and, naturally, anyone who suggests otherwise is a closet DU disruptor and should be banned.
2
posted on
10/04/2003 3:32:50 AM PDT
by
Ronin
(Qui tacet consentit!)
To: All
3
posted on
10/04/2003 3:33:57 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Ronin
No quite that bad...
I simply don't want to be ashamed of my vote.
4
posted on
10/04/2003 5:00:21 AM PDT
by
DB
(©)
To: DB
Would you rather be ashamed of your governor? Be sure to say "thanks Tom" whenever you see Gov Cruz!
Some times you have to look at the real world and make decisions on what exists, rather than what you want to exist, for if you make decisions in the later mindset, you will never achieve the sort of world you want to exist!
MARK A SITY
5
posted on
10/04/2003 6:21:57 AM PDT
by
logic101.net
(http://www.logic101.net/)
To: logic101.net
Hey, I basically agree.
But when Arnold picked Warren Buffet as his economic advisor that became a bridge too far for me.
6
posted on
10/04/2003 6:27:53 AM PDT
by
DB
(©)
To: logic101.net
Whoa.. its not thanks Tom, it's Thanks all the voters who threw away their votes on a candidate that cannot win. And no, if everyone who said that voted for him, he still would not win.
I heard some guy on the radio the other day saying that his religion forces him to vote for McClintock, because he will go to hell if he votes for a baby killer (Arnold I guess is now an abortion doctor), while the show host could talk no sense into him regarding his vote allowing a liberal who loves abortion in office.
It all makes no sense, but if, on some small infintismal chance that Arnold loses, I sincerly hope that all the Tom voters realize what they did to the state and the Country.
7
posted on
10/04/2003 7:06:35 AM PDT
by
LaraCroft
(I wish there was a list of all the AntiArnolds to thank if BustaMecha wins)
To: logic101.net
Some people actually want to vote their conscience despite the fact that others don't want them to. Instead some want to use cheap tactics to frighten them into voting for someone they disapprove of - Arnold. It's very feasible that Tom can win when people vote for the best man for the job instead of another closet Demoncrat. Then again some are content with continually lowering their standards and settling for mediocrity.
8
posted on
10/04/2003 7:16:10 AM PDT
by
nmh
To: logic101.net
IMHO too many people think of the process (governing) as an event (election). The election of the candidate is only the first step in the process. You need to get the guy into office who is first and foremost electable given the profile of the electorate. THEN, you have to apply constant pressure on him/her to move closer and closer to your position. If you split the vote and the "other side" gets in
no amount of pressure on your part will benefit you and your positions.
logic101 has it EXACTLY right!
9
posted on
10/04/2003 7:29:30 AM PDT
by
Thom Pain
To: logic101.net
The author has it backwards. It's the Arnold camp which is causing a socialist - Arnold himself - to be elected.
10
posted on
10/04/2003 8:47:23 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(tpaine says, "Don't post to me anymore." <- guess he lost that argument. Don't kill babies, people!!)
To: logic101.net
Being from Tennessee, I can't vote in the California election. Before the recent, coordinated smear attacks on Arnold, President Bush, and Rush, I might have voted for McClintock if I were a Californian.
Now there is no reason to support McClintock and a compelling reason for all Californians who value thier freedom to vote for Arnold. We must make this anit-American, Marxist smear campaign explode in the faces of the DemonRATS.
To: thoughtomator
The author has it backwards. It's the Arnold camp which is causing a socialist - Arnold himself - to be elected.
Wow!
Guess Hillary Clinton is so opposed to him because he is "only" a socialist?
Gues the LA Slime is so opposed to him because they are right'wing upholders of democracy, etc.?
You DO remember Arnolds quote about Milton Friedman, don't you? Socialist, indeed. there may be good reason to vote against Arnold, but a follower of Milton Friedman is not a socialist. Etc.
12
posted on
10/04/2003 12:05:55 PM PDT
by
fqued
(Arnold, in spite of a "vote for Tom McClintock being a vote for Pia Zadora.")
To: thoughtomator
I see that you don't understand what Socialism is. I have studied it. Socialism is government control of everything, to put it simply. Arnold is not Socialist, he is a moderate. Cruz is a Socalist. Tom is giving Cruz a chance at the Governor's office.
I'd have much rather seen Tom elected, but guys, it is time for a reality check!
Mark A Sity
13
posted on
10/04/2003 4:06:38 PM PDT
by
logic101.net
(http://www.logic101.net/)
To: nmh
Well, why not go all the way and vote for Cruz? Since it is Arnold you disapprove of, and didn't mention any disapproval of Cruz, you might as well vote for the candidate that can win!
Personally I'd rather have someone who I at least shared some views with, rather than someone who sees things exactly the opposite of my view.
Mark A Sity
14
posted on
10/04/2003 4:10:47 PM PDT
by
logic101.net
(http://www.logic101.net/)
To: Ronin
Saddly, you are right about Tom's supporters going down with the ship. His staying in just might prevent him from ever getting a higher office since he may leave voters with a bad taste. This would really be a shame as I'd love to see him as a Senator.
I have seen the same attitude among Libertarians when I posted my original article after the last election.
Mark A Sity
15
posted on
10/04/2003 4:15:48 PM PDT
by
logic101.net
(http://www.logic101.net/)
To: DB
I was not thrilled with Buffet either, in fact I was shocked! But, who exactly would Cruz be listening to on economic matters?
This is a case of the lesser of two evils.
Mark A Sity
16
posted on
10/04/2003 4:17:25 PM PDT
by
logic101.net
(http://www.logic101.net/)
To: LaraCroft
No, it is "thanks Tom", since he stayed in even though the numbers were not there. Although I do understand your point.
Was it the Hannity (sp?) show you were listening to? I think I caught part of that call, or one like it. It is not as if States were still allowed the freedoms granted them in the Constitution!
And when did Arnold have time to go to medical school to become an abortion doctor? I guess I missed that on his bio.
Mark A Sity
17
posted on
10/04/2003 4:23:05 PM PDT
by
logic101.net
(http://www.logic101.net/)
To: Thom Pain
Thank you.
18
posted on
10/04/2003 4:23:48 PM PDT
by
logic101.net
(http://www.logic101.net/)
To: libstripper
If Cruz wins, not only will the libs have the governor's office in CA, but the best chance to beat Frankenstein or Boxer will have burned his bridges! This is a potentially very bad situation!
Mark A Sity
19
posted on
10/04/2003 4:26:08 PM PDT
by
logic101.net
(http://www.logic101.net/)
To: fqued
I was actually surprised that Freedman came out in support of Arnold. As an Econ major his text books were the staple! However, Milton is a realist.
Mark A Sity
20
posted on
10/04/2003 4:28:58 PM PDT
by
logic101.net
(http://www.logic101.net/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson