Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McClintock Can't Win? Do the Math Again
Perspicacity & Paradigms Online ^ | October 1, 2003 | Rand Green

Posted on 10/03/2003 12:48:20 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy

McClintock can’t win? Do the math again!

From Perspicacity & Paradigms Online (www.perspicacityonline.com) Posted Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2003 By Rand Green P&P Editor & Publisher

OVERWHELMINGLY, Republicans who plan on voting for Arnold Schwarzenegger in the California gubernatorial election on October 7 justify their choice by saying that they would rather see Tom McClintock be governor but they just don’t believe Tom can win.

You hear it over and over again. On talk radio. In letters to the editor. On network interviews. In emails. In conversations around the water fountain at work or on the golf course or at Chamber of Commerce meetings or at church. The sentiment is seemingly ubiquitous. “We’re tired of losing. Sure, Arnold’s a social liberal, but he’s a fiscal conservative, and we’d rather have 75 percent of something than 100 percent of nothing. McClintock can’t win, and if he splits the Republican vote, it will assure a Bustamante victory.”

I do not believe I have heard a single Republican supporter of Mr. Scharzenegger declare that he is the best qualified candidate or the preferred choice; only that he is the most electable. Many Republican leaders, in endorsing Arnold, have said if the balance tipped and it appeared that Tom could win, they would eagerly support him. But that will never happen, they say. “This is, after all, California, and California is a Democratic state. The majority of Californians are social liberals, and even though we wish it were otherwise, a true conservative has no chance of winning. Do the math.”

The “math” they talk about is simple -- or, more accurately, simplistic: A week out from the election, Arnold Schwarzenegger was holding a two to one lead over Tom McClintock in the polls (40 percent to 18 percent), and Tom was trailing Lt. Governor Cruz Bustamante. Therefore, they conclude, Tom lacks the support to beat Cruz, and Arnold is the Republican party’s only hope.

You know, ordinarily it’s the liberal media and the liberal Democrats that I frequently suggest need to take a class in remedial math. Now, I have to suggest that the California Republican leadership needs to do the same thing.

I’m not about to get on their case in this article for not voting their convictions, for not standing by their principles. It may well be time to preach to the choir, but I’ll do that in another piece. For the moment, I’d just like to set the record straight on the math.

Ever hear of self-fulfilling prophecy? Yeah. Well, that is exactly what is happening with the California Republican leadership’s support of Schwarzenegger. Convinced that the only kind of Republican that can win state-wide office in California is one who has broad appeal to social liberals, they have nobly sacrificed their own personal preference in the interest of what they deem the greater good.

Rather than throwing their wholehearted support behind a candidate of Tom McClintock’s caliber, integrity and conviction, rather than seizing an opportune moment to explain to Californians that liberalism is a flawed concept and is at the root of the state’s problems, rather than pointing out that the left has misrepresented conservatism and that only a conservative agenda will bring greater prosperity, freedom and opportunity for all, California’s Republican leaders have basically thrown in the towel and acknowledged tacit defeat. Better to settle for a liberal (or a moderate if you insist) with an R after his name than to wind up with nothing.

Not only have the leaders of the California Republican party almost unanimously thrown their support behind Arnold (although nearly one-third of the rank-and-file stand firmly behind Tom), but they have urged -- no, they have pressured Tom’s supporters to hold their noses at the ballot box and vote contrary to the dictates of their conscience. Misery loves company.

If every Republican voter in California who believes that Tom McClintock would be the best choice for governor -- if only he could win -- would vote for Tom McClintock, he would win by a landslide.

If every Republican leader in the state, every conservative organization, and every conservative talk show host who has supported Arnold Schwarzenneger had instead endorsed the candidate they’d really like to see win, if only he could, their influence would have assured a victory for Tom McClintock.

Instead, they are talking themselves blue in the face, sometimes with angry tones in their voices, lambasting McClintock supporters for standing stubbornly by their principles and “splitting the Republican vote.” It is a squandering of energy that would better be invested in extolling the virtues of conservatism and exposing the liberal myth. And it is disingenuous. Here’s why:

The fact is, McClintock supporters are not splitting the Republican vote. If anything, it is the other way around. After all, Tom McClintock was in the race first. But more to the point, if Arnold had not jumped in, who would these Republican leaders and conservative organizations be backing? If they really, honestly believe that Arnold is the only candidate with enough public appeal to win, why did they back the recall in the first place? If they were convinced that Tom McClintock or Darrel Issa or Bill Simon didn’t have a chance against any of the likely Democratic contenders, what did they think to gain by ousting Governor Davis?

Or did they have foreknowledge of a Schwarzenegger candidacy even before the Steroid Wonder had made his decision to run?

Now for the math. Let’s run the numbers.

With Bustamante at 25 percent and sliding, and McClintock at 18 percent and climbing, McClintock is only seven points back from beating Bustamante, and the gap is closing. Schwarzenegger supporters rant about how McClintock needs to drop out to assure a Republican victory, but nobody seems to be asking what would happen if Schwarzenegger pulled out of the race. A CNN poll actually posed that question, but apparently nobody in the new media liked the answer, because it never got reported!

According to the CNN poll, if Schwarzeneger were to drop out of the race, McClintock would beat Bustamante by 56 percent to 37 percent! The idea that Tom McClintock could not win is nonsense. The idea that a principled conservative cannot win in California is absurd. If Tom McClintock is not elected governor on October 7, it will not be because he is unelectable. It will not be because a social and fiscal liberal named Arnold Schwarzenegger -- who calls himself a Republican and who, by pretending to be a social moderate and a fiscal conservative, is pulling off the most successful acting roll of his career -- is the only R who can win. It will be because of self-fulfilling prophecy on the part of party leaders with a “we’re sick and tired of losing” mentality.

Here are some more highly relevant numbers. Senator McClintock has name recognition in California of 96 percent. Over 60 percent of California voters - and not just Republicans -- have a favorable impression of him, and only 20 percent have a negative opinion.

Given that Tom McClintock needs to gain only seven points to close the gap with Lt. Gov. Bustamante, and that the vast majority of those who say they’ll vote for Schwarzenegger would gladly tip to Tom if they thought he could win, it would only take a few key Republican leaders, even at this late date, to break ranks and call for their constituents to support McClintock, and people would quickly see that a McClintock victory is indeed possible. Once that possibility became apparent, Republican voters would run in droves to the other end of the teeter-totter.

They just need a little leadership to make that happen.

Or maybe they don’t. Maybe the voters of California will figure this out for themselves and vote their conscience, notwithstanding the endorsements of party leadership in favor of a candidate who is not their first choice. If that should happen, there are going to be a lot of high-profile Republicans in the state feeling more than a little chagrinned.

But what about this vote-split concern? What if some Arnold supporters switch to Tom but not in large enough numbers to give Tom the victory? Will not that vote splitting assure a Bustamante victory as so many Arnold supporters contend?

Not at all -- not unless, in the next few days, Bustamante makes a huge surge in the polls, which is unlikely as his popularity has been going steadily down, not up.

Again, let’s run the numbers. Clear, straightforward math.

Currently the polls show: Schwarzenegger, 40 percent. Bustamante, 25 percent. McClintock, 18 percent. Now follow me. Forty plus 18 equals 58. Combined, the Republican candidates beat Bustamante by well over two to one.

Suppose McClintock comes within one point of overtaking Bustamante but can’t quite pull over the top. We can assume that any McClintock gains are likely to come from Schwarzenegger voters, not Bustamante voters. So that would put McClintock at 24 percent, Bustamante at 25 percent, and Schwarzenegger at 34 percent, still the victor by a whopping nine point margin.

If McClintock gains eight points, enough to put him ahead of Bustamante by a point, that still leaves Schwarzenegger with 32 percent of the vote and an impressive seven point margin of victory.

Think what a well-deserved embarrassment that would be for the Democrats to have not one but two Republican candidates get more votes than the lieutenant governor.

You see, unless something happens to give Bustamante a tremendous boost, McClintock can’t possibly be a spoiler. So no one who in their heart of hearts would really rather cast a vote for McClintock than for Schwarzenegger needs to worry about being the cause of a Republican defeat if they vote their conscience. Arnold backers should just lay off the guilt trip, because it is without basis.

Maybe what some of those who say a principled conservative can’t win in California are really afraid of is not that McClintock supporters might split the ticket and cause Republicans to lose but that Tom might actually gain enough momentum to win, thus proving their pessimism unfounded. Maybe that’s why they are digging in and turning the turrets on their brethren instead of taking the battle to the foe.

Can Tom McClintock win on October 7? Yes he can. Do the math!

If all voters in California would vote their conscience, their principles, their head and their heart and not allow themselves to be intimidated, the numbers show that Tom McClintock would be California's next governor and the myth that that no principled conservative can win statewide office in the Golden State would be forever dispelled.

As Shakespeare wrote, and as Tom McClintock has recently quoted: “There is a tide in the affairs of men which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life are spent in shallows and in miseries. On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves, or lose our ventures.”

From Perspicacity & Paradigms (www.perspicacityonline.com). Copyright (c) 2003 by Rand Green Communications. Note: You may make coies of this article for free distribution, distribute it by email, or post it to the internet, if you do so in its entirety, complete with all credits and this copyright notice.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: dreamon; math; mcclintock; newmath; perspicacity; randgreen; recall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-294 next last
To: CheneyChick
Tom, Cruz, and Greenie didn't need a primary. Only Arnold needs a primary.

The lack of logic hurts my brain. But then again, I am as dumb as dirt.
261 posted on 10/04/2003 8:05:53 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (There is no shame in being poor, just dressing poorly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

262 posted on 10/04/2003 8:11:07 PM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle

Thank you for the grin. Can I be a Tiggywinkle friend?

263 posted on 10/04/2003 8:16:47 PM PDT by EllaMinnow (Life is too important to be taken seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
**Can I be a Tiggywinkle friend?**

:o)

264 posted on 10/04/2003 8:20:18 PM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Just make sure your pocket handkins are well pressed, r.
265 posted on 10/04/2003 8:20:47 PM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

And that's why you'd vote for a Republican Bill Clinton. Maybe you'll like his groping ways better for state government policy.
266 posted on 10/04/2003 10:06:51 PM PDT by sruleoflaw ((FOR TOM MCCLINTOCK: Arnold will get my vote when hell freezes over and pigs fly))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
A person loses an election because he/she can not muster enough voter support. If Bustamante gets more votes than Schwarzenegger, it is nobody's fault but Schwarzenegger's. (Of course, Bustamante is in the process of an implosion, so there is no real possibilty Busty will win. It's a two-way race now - Schwarzenegger and McClintock.)
267 posted on 10/04/2003 10:13:21 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
What a pathetic story!

"Hey, who says McClintock can't win! Just do the numbers -- if only his opponent would drop out of the race, he'd be SURE to win."

Well, duh. Not much of an argument, if you ask me.

268 posted on 10/04/2003 11:40:31 PM PDT by paulklenk (DEPORT HILLARY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Imagine if you were Tom McClintock and you had sacrificed your life to serve the people of California for over twenty years and then the CA Republican Party spits in your face and supports a guy who has never even won a primary!! It's a wonder McClintock is still out there kicking.

That's precisely the problem. McClintock cannot get over himself. To paraphrase bill clinton, "this is w-a-a-aay bigger than Tom McClintock."

That, post-911, McClintock cannot understand the national--indeed, the global-- implications of this race--or chooses not to--demonstrates his unfitness for the job.

Sadly for the nation, the McClintockians (and, reactively, the Arnoldites) are allowing the clintons and the dems, generally, to play them like fiddles. We really must try to see beyond our own provincial ideology and see the big picture. If we do that, our individual goals will fall into place...

269 posted on 10/05/2003 3:51:20 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
No I am not jesting. I am only pointing out that you suggested Busto as gov, over Arnold. It is not professional to imply as you did that Tom supports this view.

This comes from an out of state supporter for McClintock.
270 posted on 10/05/2003 5:55:24 AM PDT by inPhase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
So you want a different (and bigger) pile of dog-doo in Sack-a-mentals instead of actually CLEANING UP the mess created by liberals and RINOs, and you're willing to give SchwartzenKennedy a pass on all his liberal issues, just because he "can win." What does it profit you if, in "winning," you lose (or give away) the "soul" of the state? Just what exactly do you "win" besides a Liberal Democrat who has an (R) after his name????? And just HOW does this improve the lot of California?

I do not want to see Bustamover take over... no one in their right mind would... BUT it would be better to see him in office and have a UNITED Pubbie front in OPPOSITION to him than to have the wolf in Pubbie clothing able to run over the top of ALL of us by giving the more liberal pubbies an excuse to move farther to the left... which is ALL that electing RINOld will do. It will NOT solve the fiscal crisis we face and will, in fact, make things WORSE as his liberal agenda gets passed by the legislature and SIGNED by him... is this what you REALLY want to see? If so, have at it and I'll be waving from afar REAL soon!
271 posted on 10/05/2003 2:20:45 PM PDT by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle
You can just bet the ranch I am a ONE ISSUE voter: The Constitution for the United States and its attendant FREEDOM. Something you, in your zeal to win at all costs, don't seem to factor into the equation... NO ONE who takes positions contrary to the limitations on GOVERNMENT as defined in the Constitution is worthy of my vote. My vote is only for sale to the one who can demonstrate his or her committment to the principles on which this once-great nation was founded. That person is NOT RINOld.
272 posted on 10/05/2003 2:29:02 PM PDT by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle
For SHAME... calling RINOld supporters DUMB... It's true, but you are shameful!
273 posted on 10/05/2003 2:30:16 PM PDT by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Wish I was a 'California girl' so I could:

VOTE FOR ARNOLD AND ANNOY HILLARY!
274 posted on 10/05/2003 2:34:19 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (Take W-04....Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
The only difference I see, as a former Californio, is the wide difference betweeen the poll numbers. I am personally sorry to say that McC has no chance and will be forever known as a spoiler if Ahnold does not beat Bustamante. The reality is in the numbers, and not in the "R" men involved. I also think Ahnold is not an experienced or a moral man, but he has the following.
275 posted on 10/05/2003 3:27:25 PM PDT by Paulus Invictus (RATs are scum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

Comment #276 Removed by Moderator

To: AllenBarraIsRight
I met the author of this article and his wife yesterday at the Walk for Tom in Fresno. They came to walk precincts and we decided to distribute this piece along with the flyer from McClintock's campaign.

It's a shame pro Arnold fans are so enamored with the big star, they can't see what a fine governor McClintock would make. Go figure.
277 posted on 10/05/2003 6:04:18 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
I wish I could have been there to see him. Thank you for your kind response.
278 posted on 10/05/2003 7:52:41 PM PDT by harpo11 (Make it a Doubleheader: Dump the Pukenater & Hire the Governater & Dump ESPN NFL Sunday Countdown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
You miss my point entirely. Suggestion: Less emphasis on the scatologic, more on plain logic, might help.

To paraphrase clinton, this race is about "w-a-a-aay more than" California. If the clintons -- heaven help us -- retake the White House, we will necessarily lose the war on terror. And this defeat will render all of your parochial concerns quite moot.

But the clintons need to control CA and its electoral votes in order to retake the White House. If the Republicans win, the clintons lose control. Said another way, a vote for McClintock is a vote for hillary; a vote for McClintock is a vote for the terrorists.
279 posted on 10/05/2003 8:04:51 PM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Said another way, you don't have the vaguest CLUE as to what you are talking about. A vote for RINOld is a vote for Kennedy is a vote for Clowntoon is a vote for more unprincipled liberal "pubbies" is a vote for more mess in Sackamentals and not less. It's that simple. You are part of the PROBLEM, not part of the solution. That (R) after RINOld's name is NOT all there is to politics, else HilLiary could change her party affiliation and she'd get your vote... Grow up and get some VALUES. Read the Constitution for the United States, then read RINOld's "positions" and if you think that his B.S. degree, or his Ph.D. is more to your taste, wallow in it... (BTW, you probably know what BS is... PhD is the same, piled higher and deeper... and that is just exactly what we will get if you get your way.) THINK, people... celebrity is NOT what a Constitutional Republic is about. It is VALUES, PRINCIPLES and FREEDOM FROM BIG Government..... None of which are offered by RINOld or his supporters.
280 posted on 10/05/2003 8:19:17 PM PDT by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-294 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson