Skip to comments.
Judge rules against U.S.: Says can't seek death penalty against Zacarias Moussaoui
MSNBC
Posted on 10/02/2003 10:54:19 AM PDT by jern
Judge rules against U.S.: Says can't seek death penalty against Zacarias Moussaoui
TOPICS: Breaking News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clintonholdovers; leoniebrinkema; moussaoui; terrortrials
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
1
posted on
10/02/2003 10:54:19 AM PDT
by
jern
To: jern
He's needed as a recruiter/teacher in prison.
2
posted on
10/02/2003 10:55:20 AM PDT
by
Spruce
To: jern
The Administration made a big mistake in bringing this clymer into Federal Court.
To: jern
Federal judge rules government may not seek death sentence in Moussaoui case
LARRY MARGASAK, Associated Press Writer Thursday, October 2, 2003
(10-02) 10:48 PDT ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) --
A federal judge on Thursday barred the government from seeking the death penalty for terrorism suspect Zacarias Moussaoui, inflicting a major defeat on the government for refusing to let the defendant question three al-Qaida prisoners.
U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema rejected a more severe option to dismiss all charges. The government had acknowledged dismissal would be appropriate, so there could be a quick appeal of her earlier ruling grantings Moussaoui access to the prisoners.
She said the government's notice of intent to seek a sentence of death must be stricken and prosecutors cannot present any evidence or argument that the defendant was involved in, or had knowledge of, planning the Sept. 11 attacks.
Brinkema postponed the effect of her ruling so the government could appeal.
The government had been anticipating a dismissal, telling Brinkema that throwing out the charges would be the quickest route to intervention by an appellate court. Moussaoui and his court-appointed defense team had asked for dismissal.
Brinkema was responding to government defiance of her rulings in January and August, which granted Moussaoui access to the prisoners through a satellite connection.
Brinkema concluded that Moussaoui's constitutional right to potentially favorable witnesses took precedence over the government's need to protect classified information that could be revealed in testimony by the captives.
Prosecutors had argued that national security would be gravely harmed if any details were revealed about the sensitive interrogations of the prisoners, who are held in undisclosed locations outside the United States.
The Bush administration could decide to move Moussaoui's case to a military tribunal, where national security would likely trump a defendant's access to witnesses. However, that decision would likely be made only after the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in Richmond, Va. ruled on the witness-access issue. The side that loses in the appellate court could ask the Supreme Court to intervene.
Two of the prisoners were among Osama bin Laden's top operatives, Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and a key planner of the attacks, Ramzi Binalshibh. The third is Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi, a suspected paymaster for al-Qaida.
Prosecutors argued that interrupting their interrogations would be a sensitive matter for the United States, because intelligence officials are learning valuable information about al-Qaida's operations.
Mohammed, for instance, told U.S. officials the Sept. 11 plot was five years in the making and that a wave of suicide attacks was supposed to follow, The Associated Press reported after reviewing interrogation reports.
4
posted on
10/02/2003 10:56:29 AM PDT
by
Brian S
(Government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem...RWReagan)
To: jern
Exactly what authority/law/etc. was this judgement made?
To: jern
Flesh this out........what Judge ......Brickama?
6
posted on
10/02/2003 10:56:53 AM PDT
by
Dog
To: All
These Guys Don't Want You To Donate!
|
|
Tick them off! Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
7
posted on
10/02/2003 10:58:25 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: TheBattman
A federal judge on Thursday barred the government from seeking the death penalty for terrorism suspect Zacarias Moussaoui, inflicting a major defeat on the government for refusing to let the defendant question three al-Qaida prisoners. U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema rejected a more severe option to dismiss all charges. The government had acknowledged dismissal would be appropriate, so there could be a quick appeal of her earlier ruling grantings Moussaoui access to the prisoners.
She said the government's notice of intent to seek a sentence of death must be stricken and prosecutors cannot present any evidence or argument that the defendant was involved in, or had knowledge of, planning the Sept. 11 attacks.
She can't do this....
8
posted on
10/02/2003 10:58:48 AM PDT
by
Dog
To: Dog
Another Clinton nominee strikes again.
9
posted on
10/02/2003 11:02:04 AM PDT
by
pubmom
("911" is not a suitable substitute for a .45)
To: jern
That will be overturned quickly.
10
posted on
10/02/2003 11:02:19 AM PDT
by
Beck_isright
(Shenandoah and Blue Ridge will re-emerge as the investment of the 21st Century....)
To: jern
Throw him in the general population... in New York City...
11
posted on
10/02/2003 11:03:42 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
To: Semper Paratus
You can say that again.
12
posted on
10/02/2003 11:03:59 AM PDT
by
jpl
To: Brian S
The US should get this case OUT of the US District Court and into the "military tribunal" area, where it should have been from the beginning. This judge is doing all that she can to damage the US government. She should have thrown out all the charges. Instead, she took the death penalty off the table but KEPT jurisdiction.
It is time to cut the cord. And never mind the "double jeopardy" argument if these charges are dismissed and a military tribunal trial then follows. The Supreme Court has already ruled unanimously (Quirin, 1942) that the Bill of Rights does NOT apply to such military trials.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column, "Democrats Dancing to Tunes of Glory?," discussion thread on FR. Article also on ChronWatch.
13
posted on
10/02/2003 11:05:40 AM PDT
by
Congressman Billybob
(www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
To: dead
ping
14
posted on
10/02/2003 11:05:47 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: jern
No death sentence, No Problem
Just sentence him to a "work release" job across the street from Moody's...you know the Church street area in lower Manhattan. Make him stand on the corner and beg for money. Put a large sandwich board sign on him saying I was supposed to be on one of the airplanes, but got arrested. The fine people of New York will take care of the rest.
To: Brian S
prosecutors cannot present any evidence or argument that the defendant was involved in, or had knowledge of, planning the Sept. 11 attacks. That's just great. The government, then, has literally no case.
I say: let him go. One of the best things possible would be for him to go to a "nest" somewhere. Hopefully that nest would be in Western Pakistan with a tall, skinny A-rab. A nice strike team could pay them a visit and bring justice to them.
Or, maybe when he is released there could be a little "courthouse step" justice.
16
posted on
10/02/2003 11:09:19 AM PDT
by
mattdono
To: theDentist
I agree. Announce his release in the midst of downtown Manhatten. Give all Police a one-hour standdown....coffee break...etc. Let the public know the time and location of the release, and then let the poor slob go. New Yorkers will take care of this situation. We don't need to exercise any funny legal tactics or ask Johnny what his constitutional rights are. Let New York take care of our business.
To: pubmom
"Nominated by President Bill Clinton.
Entered duty 10/23/93."
From her Bio. Note second line. Made her big moves during Carter and Clinton Administrations, though.
To: pubmom
Thanks....I was beginning to think this without asking. She another Clinton loser judge! God, with all Hillary's money from the Muslims, no wonder. She (fill in either judge or Hillary here) needs to be investigated.
To: Dog
Certainly she can.. The gov't is refusing access to EVIDENCE that he was not invovled in the Sept 11th attacks.. so therefore she can refuse evidence that says he was. It's simply saying that in the US court of law the proscution cannot present it's case if the defense is not allowed to present their's. Justice.. well in the court of law... I guess we'll just have to wait for God to exact his justice.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson