Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge rules against U.S.: Says can't seek death penalty against Zacarias Moussaoui
MSNBC

Posted on 10/02/2003 10:54:19 AM PDT by jern

Judge rules against U.S.: Says can't seek death penalty against Zacarias Moussaoui


TOPICS: Breaking News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clintonholdovers; leoniebrinkema; moussaoui; terrortrials
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 10/02/2003 10:54:19 AM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jern
He's needed as a recruiter/teacher in prison.
2 posted on 10/02/2003 10:55:20 AM PDT by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
The Administration made a big mistake in bringing this clymer into Federal Court.
3 posted on 10/02/2003 10:55:53 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Federal judge rules government may not seek death sentence in Moussaoui case

LARRY MARGASAK, Associated Press Writer Thursday, October 2, 2003






(10-02) 10:48 PDT ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) --

A federal judge on Thursday barred the government from seeking the death penalty for terrorism suspect Zacarias Moussaoui, inflicting a major defeat on the government for refusing to let the defendant question three al-Qaida prisoners.

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema rejected a more severe option to dismiss all charges. The government had acknowledged dismissal would be appropriate, so there could be a quick appeal of her earlier ruling grantings Moussaoui access to the prisoners.

She said the government's notice of intent to seek a sentence of death must be stricken and prosecutors cannot present any evidence or argument that the defendant was involved in, or had knowledge of, planning the Sept. 11 attacks.

Brinkema postponed the effect of her ruling so the government could appeal.

The government had been anticipating a dismissal, telling Brinkema that throwing out the charges would be the quickest route to intervention by an appellate court. Moussaoui and his court-appointed defense team had asked for dismissal.

Brinkema was responding to government defiance of her rulings in January and August, which granted Moussaoui access to the prisoners through a satellite connection.

Brinkema concluded that Moussaoui's constitutional right to potentially favorable witnesses took precedence over the government's need to protect classified information that could be revealed in testimony by the captives.

Prosecutors had argued that national security would be gravely harmed if any details were revealed about the sensitive interrogations of the prisoners, who are held in undisclosed locations outside the United States.

The Bush administration could decide to move Moussaoui's case to a military tribunal, where national security would likely trump a defendant's access to witnesses. However, that decision would likely be made only after the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in Richmond, Va. ruled on the witness-access issue. The side that loses in the appellate court could ask the Supreme Court to intervene.

Two of the prisoners were among Osama bin Laden's top operatives, Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and a key planner of the attacks, Ramzi Binalshibh. The third is Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi, a suspected paymaster for al-Qaida.

Prosecutors argued that interrupting their interrogations would be a sensitive matter for the United States, because intelligence officials are learning valuable information about al-Qaida's operations.

Mohammed, for instance, told U.S. officials the Sept. 11 plot was five years in the making and that a wave of suicide attacks was supposed to follow, The Associated Press reported after reviewing interrogation reports.


4 posted on 10/02/2003 10:56:29 AM PDT by Brian S (Government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem...RWReagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Exactly what authority/law/etc. was this judgement made?
5 posted on 10/02/2003 10:56:45 AM PDT by TheBattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Flesh this out........what Judge ......Brickama?
6 posted on 10/02/2003 10:56:53 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
These Guys Don't Want You To Donate!

Tick them off! Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

7 posted on 10/02/2003 10:58:25 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
A federal judge on Thursday barred the government from seeking the death penalty for terrorism suspect Zacarias Moussaoui, inflicting a major defeat on the government for refusing to let the defendant question three al-Qaida prisoners.

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema rejected a more severe option to dismiss all charges. The government had acknowledged dismissal would be appropriate, so there could be a quick appeal of her earlier ruling grantings Moussaoui access to the prisoners.

She said the government's notice of intent to seek a sentence of death must be stricken and prosecutors cannot present any evidence or argument that the defendant was involved in, or had knowledge of, planning the Sept. 11 attacks.

She can't do this....

8 posted on 10/02/2003 10:58:48 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Another Clinton nominee strikes again.
9 posted on 10/02/2003 11:02:04 AM PDT by pubmom ("911" is not a suitable substitute for a .45)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jern
That will be overturned quickly.
10 posted on 10/02/2003 11:02:19 AM PDT by Beck_isright (Shenandoah and Blue Ridge will re-emerge as the investment of the 21st Century....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Throw him in the general population... in New York City...
11 posted on 10/02/2003 11:03:42 AM PDT by theDentist (Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
You can say that again.
12 posted on 10/02/2003 11:03:59 AM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
The US should get this case OUT of the US District Court and into the "military tribunal" area, where it should have been from the beginning. This judge is doing all that she can to damage the US government. She should have thrown out all the charges. Instead, she took the death penalty off the table but KEPT jurisdiction.

It is time to cut the cord. And never mind the "double jeopardy" argument if these charges are dismissed and a military tribunal trial then follows. The Supreme Court has already ruled unanimously (Quirin, 1942) that the Bill of Rights does NOT apply to such military trials.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Democrats Dancing to Tunes of Glory?," discussion thread on FR. Article also on ChronWatch.

13 posted on 10/02/2003 11:05:40 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dead
ping
14 posted on 10/02/2003 11:05:47 AM PDT by Calpernia (Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
No death sentence, No Problem

Just sentence him to a "work release" job across the street from Moody's...you know the Church street area in lower Manhattan. Make him stand on the corner and beg for money. Put a large sandwich board sign on him saying I was supposed to be on one of the airplanes, but got arrested. The fine people of New York will take care of the rest.

15 posted on 10/02/2003 11:08:56 AM PDT by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
prosecutors cannot present any evidence or argument that the defendant was involved in, or had knowledge of, planning the Sept. 11 attacks.

That's just great. The government, then, has literally no case.

I say: let him go. One of the best things possible would be for him to go to a "nest" somewhere. Hopefully that nest would be in Western Pakistan with a tall, skinny A-rab. A nice strike team could pay them a visit and bring justice to them.

Or, maybe when he is released there could be a little "courthouse step" justice.

16 posted on 10/02/2003 11:09:19 AM PDT by mattdono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
I agree. Announce his release in the midst of downtown Manhatten. Give all Police a one-hour standdown....coffee break...etc. Let the public know the time and location of the release, and then let the poor slob go. New Yorkers will take care of this situation. We don't need to exercise any funny legal tactics or ask Johnny what his constitutional rights are. Let New York take care of our business.
17 posted on 10/02/2003 11:10:02 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pubmom
"Nominated by President Bill Clinton.
Entered duty 10/23/93."

From her Bio. Note second line. Made her big moves during Carter and Clinton Administrations, though.
18 posted on 10/02/2003 11:11:38 AM PDT by shamusotoole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pubmom
Thanks....I was beginning to think this without asking. She another Clinton loser judge! God, with all Hillary's money from the Muslims, no wonder. She (fill in either judge or Hillary here) needs to be investigated.
19 posted on 10/02/2003 11:16:05 AM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Certainly she can.. The gov't is refusing access to EVIDENCE that he was not invovled in the Sept 11th attacks.. so therefore she can refuse evidence that says he was. It's simply saying that in the US court of law the proscution cannot present it's case if the defense is not allowed to present their's. Justice.. well in the court of law... I guess we'll just have to wait for God to exact his justice.
20 posted on 10/02/2003 11:25:39 AM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson