Skip to comments.
Help The Bush Administration Out Joe Wilson As A Liar (Email To Talk Radio Hosts/Vanity)
Pubbie
| 09/29/03
| Pubbie
Posted on 09/29/2003 12:58:56 PM PDT by Pubbie
Below are links to threads that prove Joe Wilson is a liar.
Since The Network News Shows will never paint Wilson in a bad light, we need to get the word out to other sources of news ie Radio Talk shows.
Email any Conservative talk show host like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and G. Gordon Liddy and show them the links to threads about how Joe Wilson is a crook and a liar:
Wilson: I Made it Up Rove Leak Allegation
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/991629/posts
Was it really a secret that Joe Wilson's wife worked for the CIA? (AWESOME Dirt On Joe Wilson!)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/991646/posts
Joseph Wilson Said He Personally Wants Rove Taken Away "In Handcuffs"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/991661/posts
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: joewilson; leak; lies; niger; nigerflap; plame; wilson; yellowcake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: Pubbie
I actually sat in the same DC metrorail car with him I think last week when I was vacationing in DC. I didn't get confirmation until I saw his picture again tonight.
I should have asked him a question.
To: swarthyguy
Good point. Ijaz is a great self-promoter
Those people familiar with the intricacies of the State Department can usually discern something about a Foreign Service Officer by perusing his biography. In Wilson's case one can discern that given his continuous (1976-85) assignments to Africa he was considered by superiors to have little star power. In other words, he was a mediocrity in his class because Africa is the last assignment that anyone with ambition wants.
His assignment to Congressional offices (Gore and Foley) in the years 85-86 is a common career move after ten years; the fact that he served in the offices of both Gore and Foley indicates a proclivity to work with Democrats. Wilson then returned to Africa during 86-88, before being sent as second man to Iraq (an indication that he was expendable). He returned to Africa as Ambassador (92-95), and then spend a year as a Special Assistant to the National Security Council from June 97 to July 98. He was, in essence, a flack -- doing the legwork to set up the Clinton trip to Africa.
In sum, Wilson's work in Iraq led to an ambassadorship; however, it should be understood that like old elephants, Foreign Service Officers who end their careers in Africa play out a death sentence issued by the Department decades before.
I believe that most people who have seen this gentleman on television are left with the impression that he is a nasty piece of goods, and a very cold individual.
42
posted on
09/29/2003 4:10:43 PM PDT
by
gaspar
To: Grampa Dave
This isn't really on topic, but it IS bothering me...
This "pro Saudi Middle East Institute" that Wilson works for...and Wesly Clark's claim that on 9/11/01 he got a phone call from the White House, which was "all over" at a "Mideast think tank", apparently in Canada while he was "at home" on "CNN.
Is there a connection? This needs to be checked into.
43
posted on
09/29/2003 4:19:58 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: Grampa Dave
This whole episode made out of a non-story just chaps my hide. So many people at the center of storm, such as Bob Novak, have come out right away to fully explain everthing, yet the dems are faking that they really care about national security.
To: cake_crumb
I don't know about there being a Canadian link.
However, I'm waiting for someone to post data/links showing a connection between Wilson and Weasel Clark, the phoney/plastic Clintoon GI Joe!
45
posted on
09/29/2003 4:24:19 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(May our brave warriors kill all of the Islamokazis/facists/nazis to prevent future 9/11's.)
To: Belial
"That's ridiculous. Novak and at least six other journalists were contacted by one or two senior Administration officials with the identity of Wilson's wife."WHAT "senior administration officials" were those? If it were Rove as the grandstanding Wilson alleged and then retracted, why's Rove pluralized into more than one person, BBC/Kelly/Gilligan/Campbell-style?
And the NUMBER ONE QUESTION IS (Novak's statements gave me this idea) : were these contacts by "senior administration officials" CALLBACKS in response to inquiries? Inquiring minds want to know, and the media sure as heck won't tell.
46
posted on
09/29/2003 4:26:11 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: KC_Conspirator
If you step and back and look at this non story, you will see that it has been bubbling on their back burners/blogs since July.
So they have had it ready to release to divert our attention from bad news for their side and good news for our side when they needed it. Now they are releasing it and pushing it.
So we need to find the good news for us and post it.
This reeks of full blown panic on their part, not just another attempted electronic lynching of our president. They know that something bad for them is about to break loose.
47
posted on
09/29/2003 4:27:34 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(May our brave warriors kill all of the Islamokazis/facists/nazis to prevent future 9/11's.)
To: Belial
"Wilson doesn't qualify as a senior official."Kelly for some reason qualified as a senior intelligence official. To the media.
48
posted on
09/29/2003 4:27:58 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: Burkeman1
"I doubt this 'scandal' will develop any legs."It'll have legs, even if those legs are put together out of spit and cardboard by the DLC. They're DESPERATE to make something STICK, even if only long enough to get a Third Way Dem back into the White House.
49
posted on
09/29/2003 4:31:15 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: cake_crumb; jmstein7
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/991817/posts Wilson Contributed Max To Kerry Campaign
Drudge Report ^ | Drudge
Posted on 09/29/2003 4:25 PM PDT by jmstein7
Wilson, Joseph C 5/23/2003 $1,000.00 Washington, DC 20007 JC Wilson International Ventures/Bu -[Contribution] JOHN KERRY FOR PRESIDENT INC.
Developing on Drudge
50
posted on
09/29/2003 4:31:20 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(May our brave warriors kill all of the Islamokazis/facists/nazis to prevent future 9/11's.)
To: TBP
I keep pointing out that she's an analyst too, not an agent. I would LIKE to know where this sudden "OPERATIVE" label, with it's implied culvert connotations. My only knowledge of her job is as an analyst. If she's a culvert agent, then even a lot of her superiors don't know it.
51
posted on
09/29/2003 4:35:40 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: cake_crumb
If there was any wrongdoing, and that is a big "if" I am sure Bush will see to it that the right head or heads roll. At most- this will cause a mid level resignation and be forgotten.
52
posted on
09/29/2003 4:36:25 PM PDT
by
Burkeman1
((If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.))
To: Burkeman1
If there was any wrongdoing, and that is a big "if" I am sure Bush will see to it that the right head or heads roll.I will be LMAO when Wilson is outed as the man with the incontinent mouth.
53
posted on
09/29/2003 4:37:53 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
("[Expletive deleted] 'em if they can't take a joke!" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: Poohbah
Very likely in fact. It wouldn't surprise me.
54
posted on
09/29/2003 4:39:03 PM PDT
by
Burkeman1
((If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.))
To: Burkeman1
I wonder how many Democrats will have to take their bicycles into the shop to fix the chains from all the backpedaling they're going to be doing (c8
55
posted on
09/29/2003 4:40:19 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
("[Expletive deleted] 'em if they can't take a joke!" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: Poohbah
LOL!!
56
posted on
09/29/2003 4:40:53 PM PDT
by
MasonGal
To: Poohbah
None- Democrats never backpeddle or admit to being wrong ever. They just shroud themselves in more lies and keep repeating the old ones. Geesh- they still, DESPITE ALL FACTS, claim Bush "stole" the election.
57
posted on
09/29/2003 4:44:48 PM PDT
by
Burkeman1
((If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.))
To: Grampa Dave
Well, Canada doesn't have any Mideast think tanks. I just couldn't resist sticking Wussley's WHOLE statement together, because I enjoy highlighting how psychotic he is.
It's actually Wilson's Middle East Institute and Clark's vague "Mideast think tank" that's bothering me. They could be one and the same, and Clark is nothing if not a great dupe.
58
posted on
09/29/2003 4:50:34 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: Grampa Dave
"Wilson Contributed Max To Kerry Campaign"FOFLOL...yeah, I can believe that. It would fit.
59
posted on
09/29/2003 4:52:30 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: Burkeman1
"If there was any wrongdoing, and that is a big 'if' I am sure Bush will see to it that the right head or heads roll. At most- this will cause a mid level resignation and be forgotten."Yes, it would...in a normal situation where there wasn't a war going on between the Third Way and real Americans. This will not be forgotten. I know Bush is not guilty. I also know the left will brand him AS guilty whether guilty or not.
This is not about guilt. If it were, I wouldn't have known what her job was last February and this story wouldn't have stayed under the media radar for OVER TWO MONTHS.
However, the Propaganda Machine WILL continue to brand the administration guilty, as they have with their vague Haliburton accusations.
This is about winning the ideological war, pure and simple. It's a battle for the White House. The stakes are obvious.
60
posted on
09/29/2003 4:59:22 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson