Skip to comments.
HOWARD DEAN'S UGLY SLUR
Yahoo News ^
| 9/27/03
Posted on 09/27/2003 11:24:01 AM PDT by South40
There was a particularly ugly moment during Thursday's free-for-all between the 10 Democratic presidential candidates at Pace University.
It came when an obviously stung Howard Dean lashed out at rival Dick Gephardt for comparing him to former GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
"We need to remember that the enemy here is George Bush, not each other," said Dean.
Say what?
George Bush is the enemy?
Did Dean misspeak?
Or did he say what he meant?
Casual slur?
Or Freudian slip?
Either way, it was rendered even more offensive by the fact that it took place at Pace University - once-upon-a-time virtually in the shadows of the Twin Towers.
Even more sad is the fact that not one of his opponents - especially pols like Joe Lieberman and Bob Graham, who allegedly know better - criticized Dean on his use of the word.
Which we have to assume means that they agreed with it.
So let's be clear here.
George W. Bush is the president of the United States.
Osama bin Laden is the "enemy."
So was Saddam Hussein, until Operation Iraqi Freedom ended his murderous regime - no thanks to Howard Dean.
Dean and the other Democratic candidates owe an apology to President Bush.
And to the American people.
Not that we expect any such thing, of course.
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; howarddean; slur
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: billorites
I think he's going to blow up,too but it's got to be on camera or it won't matter.Bill and Hill were well known to curse and throw things ,but off camera.
21
posted on
09/27/2003 11:48:39 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: South40
"We need to remember that the enemy here is George Bush, not each other," said Dean.It's the "Democratic party" creed don't you know. "Party before Country"!
22
posted on
09/27/2003 11:50:33 AM PDT
by
EGPWS
To: BonnieJ
My unscientific guess is that it's been a gradual thing, starting with the Vietnam era, but the Clinton years greatly accelerated it. You're right, things are being said now by Dem politicians that no one could have imagined in the 1980s.
To: South40
Howard Dean is an UGLY SLUR!
To: mountaineer
Yes...that was long ago...before the Klintoooon regime....and the ME generation of the 90's. For the dems...it's all about winning. When they are out of power they get desparate and nasty and all that counts is getting their power back.
25
posted on
09/27/2003 11:55:22 AM PDT
by
mrtysmm
To: GoGophers
Not every Democrat is a Communist.You're right.
The rest of them are fools!
26
posted on
09/27/2003 11:55:58 AM PDT
by
Gritty
To: South40
I Have Seen The Enemy.... They Are The Demoncraps
27
posted on
09/27/2003 11:58:46 AM PDT
by
Duramaximus
(Tom McClintock - Unlike Arnold, Tom Really Is A Conservative!)
To: South40
Of course Bush is worse than bin Ladin. Bin Ladin has just killed a few thousand Americans, but Bush has thrown the Democrats out of power.
28
posted on
09/27/2003 12:09:06 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: halflion
"To disagree with Bush's policies does not equate with siding with Saddam or Bin laden. Oner can dislike both in equal measure."
You just equated them! My G-d, you make our point!
To: GoGophers
Re: enemy
Good point. But IMO today's "new" and "old" Democrat Parties' leaders are not traditional Democrats.
The left makes no secret of their feeeeeeeeeelings. Remarks by Democrat stalwarts like Ellen Ratner and salon's Gary Kamiya prove it.. Both have expressed hopes for a U.S. disaster in Iraq. By any definition that means dead Americans. Fox News Channel's "Your World" Dec. 28, 2002 for Ratner and Mr. Kamiya's remarks at salon.com, April 11, 2003.
Some rank and file Democrats prove it, also. A Mill Valley, Calif. resident wrote the S.F. Chronicle to say that some things are worth the lives of other people's sons and daughters:
"The constant loss of U.S. soldiers in Iraq--after the war is "won"--is a tragedy. However, if this is what it takes to retire the Bush administration at the next election, the sacrifice is justified."
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/07/11/ED272984.DTL
IMO it's fair to say that many of us despised Bill Clinton as President and wished him "interesting times." But NOT ONE of us wished ill upon America or Americans. Not so the Democrats.
To be fair, I agree that the left is the enemy. I believe that they and their "new" and "old" Democrat leaders ARE traitors. This war between left and right is the war inside of the major war to protect against radical Islam. Its outcome will determine whose America survives the war to protect against radical Islam and is just as important. IMO.
To: GoGophers
Good grief. I think you might be reacting just a tad. We are talking about a presidential election. Most conservatives consider the ten Democratic challengers to be the "enemy."Of course, nobody on this forum has ever called Bill Clinton "the enemy."
32
posted on
09/27/2003 12:20:15 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: xm177e2
The point is that no Republican leader, let alone any Republican presidential candidate has ever called a Democrat president an "enemy." This has absolutely got to be used agains the Dems.
And by the way, I think Dean should be strung up for saying it. After a fair trial, of course.
33
posted on
09/27/2003 12:25:06 PM PDT
by
zook
To: South40
Well let's be honest here, how many of us here at Free Republic consider Dean & Co. to be the enemy, as well as Bill and Hillary? They are the enemy to a strong and prosperous America, so to a socialist like Dean, President Bush is an enemy in the same way. Yeah I understand the point being made, but how many people at F.R. "supported" Bill Clinton as President the same way they "support" President Bush or President Reagan?
34
posted on
09/27/2003 12:25:28 PM PDT
by
Contra
To: South40
Dean was just stating the official party position as a whole.
George W. Bush is a much bigger threat to democrat power than any islamo-fascists are.
35
posted on
09/27/2003 12:27:49 PM PDT
by
Bullish
To: South40
If Howard Dean said that, he is a nitwit. Besides anyone stupid enough to follow and pander like this guy does is not Presidential material.
To: Bullish
Precisely, they are dems first, Americans second (if at all). And they wonder why their patriotism is in doubt; life for them is one constant campaign in a blind lust for power.
37
posted on
09/27/2003 12:33:17 PM PDT
by
tioga
To: South40
And democRATs were offended by Ann Coulter's allegation that they are practicing traitors.
She hit the nail on the head. Amen! Reading Ann's book, "Traitors", now ... it is unbelievably right on, and documented rock solid! I am tempted to go read Al Franken or what ever his name is' book, as I hear it is just a stupid rock trowing poorly documented book .. (if I can stay awake through it) just so I can have total credibility in my mind of the differences between the absolute truth on the right and the rediculous ascinine unfounded assertions that make up the left ....
$22 for used for Franken? forget it! Don't want to spend that much on such garbage (spent some time scanning it at the book store a week ago) ... I'll just trust my instincts and buy more info on Alger Hiss, the HUAC and McCarthy, to prove my hunches on who's telling the truth.
38
posted on
09/27/2003 12:40:04 PM PDT
by
AgThorn
(Go go Bush!!)
To: RightOnline
Are you sure? The bent One did not act, for EIGHT YEARS, as if he ultimately had the good of the USA at heart. In fact, the entire Gang of Ten is perhaps open to debate as to whether they are Americans, or democrats, or Socialists first.
They sure seem to be thrilled at the idea that a few more American soldiers die, every week, in some far-off toilet. I am really curious as to just who is the bigger Enemy in the eyes of the Democrats Party...
39
posted on
09/27/2003 12:40:13 PM PDT
by
jonascord
(Don't bother to run, you'll only die tired...)
To: GoGophers
Not every Democrat is a Communist. What parallel universe have you been in?
40
posted on
09/27/2003 12:43:28 PM PDT
by
BobbyK
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson