Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Bush's Illegal War' Questionnaire (Share with your appeasenik friends!)
Sykes Writes at WTMJ Milwaukee ^ | 24 Sep 03 | A 620 WTMJ listener

Posted on 09/26/2003 7:44:19 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback

Please answer as many of the following questions as you can, and as many with a straight face as possible. Please answer quickly as you already have all of the answers.

1. Since George W. Bush is evil, and thought by some to be far more dangerous than Saddam Hussein, could you please list the instances you are aware of where George W. Bush has ordered the murder, torture and rape of American citizens, like yourself, who oppose his presidency.

2. Could you list any sites of mass graves of American citizens ordered to be killed by the Bush administration?

3. Further, could you please list the instances you are aware of when George W. Bush has ordered the murder of members of his own family.

4. Do you feel that Saddam Hussein possessed no weapons he was specifically forbidden to have by the UN; for example, the Scud missiles he fired into Kuwait during the first two weeks of the war?

5. How do you think Saddam was able to fire weapons that he didn't have?

6. Are inspectors inspectors, or are inspectors detectives?

7. How many more months would you have given Saddam Hussein to comply with the 17 UN resolutions, passed over 12 years?

8. If you owned an apartment building, for how many months would you allow a tenant to defy you to kick him out for not paying the rent he owes?

9. If the UN, and the previous administration, were convinced Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and used that as a basis for their actions against Iraq, how do those reasons evaporate when applied by the Bush administration?

10. If the Bush administration, led by the evil GWB, lied about weapons of mass destruction in order to go to war, why haven't we found any WMD secretly planted by the Bush administration?

11. If you feel it would be too difficult to plant WMD in Iraq, because there are too many people watching, such that no one can do anything sneaky in Iraq, then why can't we find Saddam?

12. Do you disagree with the statement..."The weapons of mass destruction used in the 9/11 attacks were box-cutters"?

13. Do you think finding an airplane fuselage in a terrorist training camp in northern Iraq means terrorists were practicing hijackings? If not, for what purpose do you think they were using the airplane?

14. Knowing what little you may know about spy satellites, what do you think Iraq was hiding using the tunnel-digging equipment they bought from the French some 5 years ago?

15. Why do you think Iraq had a 'Higher Committee for Monitoring the Inspection Teams' headed by Hussein's Vice-President, and son, Qusay?

16. The fact that Iraq trained experts to foil UN weapons inspectors is documented not just by U.S. intelligence organizations, but by those of many other countries. Why do you think Iraq needed to use these tactics, if George W. Bush is lying?

17. In 1995, Iraq admitted it had biological weapons. They declared they had, for example, 8500 liters of anthrax. Where did they all go? If Iraq destroyed them, why would there be any need for more UN resolutions after that?

18. When do you think Iraq abandoned their existing Weapons of Mass Destruction program? What do you think was their motivation for abandoning it- the 17th time the UN said 'pretty please', or the fact that it was spending too much money that could used for social programs to improve the lives of Iraqi citizens?

19. Do you think the bio-weapons lab vehicles found in Iraq were being used as lunch wagons, or as mobile auto detail trucks?

20. If a terrorist organization attacked America tomorrow by spraying anthrax over a large city, would you blame George W. Bush for not doing enough?

21. Would Hillary?

22. How many minutes after the attack do you think it would take for Hillary to appear on CNN?

23. If an illegal U.S. president declares an illegal war, wouldn't the two cancel each other out?

Bonus Question: Do you think O.J. killed Ron and Nicole, or was he the victim of a massive conspiracy to plant evidence by many separate divisions of the LAPD?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Charles includes a note on the blog entry this questionarre is in:"NOTE: This isn't mine -- I got it from a listener. But I think it's a useful exercise. Feel free to copy it and share it with your anti-war friends and family members."

You can bet your keister on that one, Charles! Heh-heh, this is going to be fun.

1 posted on 09/26/2003 7:44:19 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; Howlin
I think your lists might like this.
2 posted on 09/26/2003 7:45:59 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (You want freedom fries with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Anti-wanker thread over here. Hold the appeaseniks feet to the fire!
3 posted on 09/26/2003 7:46:38 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (You want freedom fries with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
I know who I'm sending this to...BUMP!
4 posted on 09/26/2003 8:05:26 AM PDT by samiam1972 (Live simply so that others may simply live!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
I like the list..but I have a question about #13:

"13. Do you think finding an airplane fuselage in a terrorist training camp in northern Iraq means terrorists were practicing hijackings? If not, for what purpose do you think they were using the airplane?"

I didn't know they found a fuselage in "N. Iraq." From what I recall the fuselage is located at Salman Pak which I thought was actually 30-35 miles "south" of Baghdad, putting it in squarely in Saddam's controlled region.
5 posted on 09/26/2003 8:06:26 AM PDT by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cwboelter
Ouch. I meant to edit that and put a note about the edit in post 1, but I brain dumped it. Good catch, and correct it before using with appeaseniks; one of the current line from them (and some bush-hating freepers) is that all the terror training camps were in Kurdish territory. Yeah, as if Saddam didn't like terrorism!
6 posted on 09/26/2003 8:13:01 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (You want freedom fries with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
NOTE: See posts 5 & 6 about the Salman Pak hijacker training facility before using this questionarre!
7 posted on 09/26/2003 8:15:13 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (You want freedom fries with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Neal Boortz had it in his Nealz Nuze area Monday or last week.
8 posted on 09/26/2003 8:15:55 AM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
"4. Do you feel that Saddam Hussein possessed no weapons he was specifically forbidden to have by the UN; for example, the Scud missiles he fired into Kuwait during the first two weeks of the war?"

This one at least is wrong. The press reported every ground to ground missle fired as a scud. There were no confirmed scuds fired. The missles fired into Iraq were the "Al something" the missles that the inspectors told them had to be destroyed in Jan-Feb of this year.
9 posted on 09/26/2003 8:17:55 AM PDT by Kadric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kadric
Some of the missiles were the Al-Somud but I also heard there may have been a Chinese missile that was used as well. You better check this out to be sure...although I did hear they were extended range, also, which was a violation. Silverback...check it out to make sure.
10 posted on 09/26/2003 8:26:31 AM PDT by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
I like the "OJ sanity test" at the end. L.A. talk radio hosts John & Ken use similar OJ questions to rule on the sanity of their kookier callers.
11 posted on 09/26/2003 8:30:41 AM PDT by Redcloak (Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cwboelter
The Chinese missile was the anti shipping missile that was aimed in the general direction of Kuwait and hit around the beach. I believe it was a Silkworm.

The Al-Somuds were being destroyed before the push for the Security Council resolution in March. We said they had more of them than they admitted though. So in my thoughts at least this would be a push, it could play for either side. (My personnel view is that the fact they were built at all showed contempt for the previous resolutions.)
12 posted on 09/26/2003 8:41:32 AM PDT by Kadric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cwboelter
It was a Chinese Seersucker fired at Kuwait, I think.

We found missiles with reservoirs for filling w/ (and spraying) liquids. Precursor chems aren't that difficult to mix.

The means are easy. It takes a monster with the will to destroy a village. Saddam.

The critics were always short on logic and big on bitterness.

13 posted on 09/26/2003 8:45:12 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl ("I was taught to love America." ~ Freeper 'Bullish' ~ 1960's LA public school.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Thanks...I also found this from Blix with regards to the Al Samuds and the illegal chambers.

""In my January update to the Council I referred to the al-Samud II and the Al Fatah missiles, reconstituted casting chambers, construction of a missile engine test stand and the import of rocket engines, which were all declared to UNMOVIC by Iraq.

I noted that the al-Samud II and the Al Fatah could very well represent prima facie cases of proscribed missile systems, as they had been tested to ranges exceeding the 150 kilometers limit set by the Security Council. I also noted that Iraq had been requested to cease flight tests of these missiles until UNMOVIC completed a technical review.

Earlier this week, UNMOVIC missile experts met for two days with experts from a number of member states to discuss these items. The experts concluded unanimously that, based on the data provided by Iraq, the two declared variants of the al-Samud II missile were capable of exceeding 150 kilometers in range. This missile system is therefore proscribed for Iraq pursuant to Resolution 687 and the monitoring plan adopted by Resolution 715.

As for the Al Fatah, the experts found that clarification of the missile data supplied by Iraq was required before the capability of the missile system could be fully assessed. With respect to the casting chambers, I note the following: UNSCOM ordered and supervised the destruction of the casting chambers, which had been intended for use in the production of the proscribed Badr 2000 missile system.

Iraq has declared that it has reconstituted these chambers. The experts have confirmed that the reconstituted casting chambers could still be used to produce motors for missiles capable of ranges significantly greater than 150 kilometers. Accordingly, these chambers remain proscribed.

The expert also studied the data on the missile engine test stand that is nearing completion and have assessed it to be capable of testing missile engines with thrusts greater than that of the SA-2 engine. So far the test stand has not been associated with the proscribed activity.

On the matter of the 380 SA-2 missile engines imported outside of the export-import mechanism and in contravention of paragraph 24 of Resolution 687, UNMOVIC inspectors were informed by Iraq during an official briefing that these engines were intended for use in the al-Samud II missile system, which has now been assessed to be proscribed. Any such engines configured for use in this missile system would also be proscribed..."
14 posted on 09/26/2003 8:54:46 AM PDT by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback; MJY1288; Calpernia; Grampa Dave; anniegetyourgun; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
Thanks for the ping, Mr. Silverback. Good questions! Forwarding to the press and Senate, as well.

Tough questions for the weak critics.

 Thanks, Tonkin!

If you want on or off my Pro-Coalition ping list, please Freepmail me. Warning: it is a high volume ping list on good days. (Most days are good days).

15 posted on 09/26/2003 8:58:55 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl ("I was taught to love America." ~ Freeper 'Bullish' ~ 1960's LA public school.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl; Mr. Silverback
*BUMP!

Save this one and send it to any Iraq critics you might know. Any lib college professor, journalist, or Dem that you give this to is guaranteed to go apoplectic.
16 posted on 09/26/2003 9:05:45 AM PDT by Ex-Dem (Demo-Defectors Protection Program)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!
17 posted on 09/26/2003 9:14:43 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!
18 posted on 09/26/2003 9:33:45 AM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
.
19 posted on 09/26/2003 9:35:21 AM PDT by The Coopster (Tha's no ordinary rabbit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Here's a link to more info on the subject:

Bio-Chemical Weapons & Saddam: A History.

It's long, but worth it.

20 posted on 09/26/2003 9:55:10 AM PDT by PsyOp (The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson