Skip to comments.
Second Judge Blocks Do-Not-Call list
AP ^
| 09/025/03
| David Ho
Posted on 09/25/2003 8:49:23 PM PDT by Concentrate
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Let's have at it. Is this an example of free speech? I think not.
To: Concentrate
2
posted on
09/25/2003 8:52:07 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: Calpernia; John Robinson
Thanks or the response, but I just busted my butt to get this out here, AFTER searching FR for the title. Never again! The search function is USELESS!
To: Concentrate
What a masochist this judge must be. :-)
4
posted on
09/25/2003 8:57:43 PM PDT
by
ChemistCat
(Terra Vegetable Chips. WOW they're good. But you will worry about your $800 crowns.)
To: Concentrate
that's alright ... consumer groups will have to put pressure on this judge too ... and see what telemarketing group he owns stock in ... or perhaps it's his brother-in-law's business ...
5
posted on
09/25/2003 8:58:08 PM PDT
by
Bobby777
To: Concentrate
Well then I'll bore you with my point. Freepers on the other thread seem to have missed it.
HECK with the FREE SPEECH issue! HECK with the telemarketers. Don't worry about them. They can't call you without a list.
THE LIST should be everyone's concern. Companies, Government and whoever else I'm missing, SELL our information for profit. Some without our consent, others with 'misled' consent. All and and all, when did our name and personal data become a commodity? AND why shouldn't we get a kick back?
Freeper m1-lightening responded that there is a Privacy Act Bill In Progress. THIS is the bill we need to support. If people can't sell our names, then there is NO LIST for the telemarketers to call you on.
6
posted on
09/25/2003 8:58:55 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: Concentrate
I'd like to exercise my free speech rights on this judge's phone. Anybody got the number?
7
posted on
09/25/2003 9:02:19 PM PDT
by
etcetera
To: Concentrate
This isn't a dupe. Don't sweat it.
8
posted on
09/25/2003 9:02:24 PM PDT
by
TomServo
("Upon further review, the refs find that Cody is dead. The play stands -- Cody is dead.")
To: etcetera
9
posted on
09/25/2003 9:03:09 PM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: Concentrate
Whatever you do, don't exercise your Constitutional right to call this judge and protest his decision at:
Judge Edward W. Nottingham Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse A1041 / Courtroom 14
(303) 844-5018
That might be wrong.
10
posted on
09/25/2003 9:05:32 PM PDT
by
strela
(I wonder if Tom McClintock will have to "make a reservation" to pay back that money?)
To: etcetera
Read
this thread about the judge's phone being swamped with calls.
11
posted on
09/25/2003 9:07:38 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: Concentrate
I found the judges Email and office phone numbers.
This is the great thinker that feels its a Constitutional right to call people, so have at it:
US District Judge Edward W. Nottingham
1929 Stout St
Denver, CO 80294
(303) 844-5018 X5 for Secretary
Staff Telephone Numbers
Chambers Email - nottingham_chambers@cod.uscourts.gov
Chambers Fax - (303) 335-2155
Secretary: Stacy Steinbrecher - (303) 844-5018 - Press 5 for Secretary
Courtroom Deputy Clerk: Edward Butler - (303) 844-5018
Docket Clerk, Civil Matters: Patricia Pirner (303) 844-3433
Docket Clerk, Criminal Matters: Elaine Quintana - (303) 844-2115
Court Reporter: Therese Lindblom - (303) 628-7877
12
posted on
09/25/2003 9:16:05 PM PDT
by
RJL
To: Calpernia
Read this thread about the judge's phone being swamped with calls. That thread was about the first judge that ruled on the DNC list - Lee R. West. This thread is about Edward Nottingham, another judge who did the same thing.
13
posted on
09/25/2003 9:17:25 PM PDT
by
strela
(I wonder if Tom McClintock will have to "make a reservation" to pay back that money?)
To: Concentrate
You done good, C. The previous thread had no specifics. This one is a good update.
Nottingham, btw, is a 1989 Bush appointee.
To: strela
Pardon.
15
posted on
09/25/2003 9:24:17 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: strela
It was West? Though it was Brinkema.
To: RJL; hchutch; Chancellor Palpatine; rdb3
Now, I would *NEVER* (Wink, wink) advocate wardialing the entire 844 exchange in the 303 area code as telemarketers do (Wink, wink) to ensure that they get maximum "target audience coverage." (Wink, wink) Uh-uh. (Wink, wink) I'd never support doing that. (Wink, wink) Not for a second. (Wink, wink)
BTW, I've suddenly (Wink, wink) developed this amazing (Wink, wink) facial tic...
On a slightly more serious note...if a pimply-faced teenager wardials an entire exchange looking for a remote access server, it's a felony. If a telemarketer wardials an entire exchange looking for someone to answer the phone...it's a First Amendment right.
What was that "equal protection under the law" thingie again? Or was it just a concept created by some dead white men?
17
posted on
09/25/2003 9:24:26 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
("[Expletive deleted] 'em if they can't take a joke!" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: Bonaparte
The FTC asked U.S. District Court Judge Lee R. West to block the order he issued Tuesday declaring the agency lacked proper authority to oversee the list ... I think its moot anyway - just a few words in the law to be changed.
18
posted on
09/25/2003 9:26:40 PM PDT
by
strela
(I wonder if Tom McClintock will have to "make a reservation" to pay back that money?)
To: Calpernia
Pour nodder. (I confuse easily, you see ...)
19
posted on
09/25/2003 9:27:30 PM PDT
by
strela
(I wonder if Tom McClintock will have to "make a reservation" to pay back that money?)
To: strela
Ah,
found it. Looks like a lot of district judges are out to help us all get harassed, whether we want to be or not.
Say, wanna start a telemarketing company specializing in selling to district court clerks over the phone? It would be more convenient than residential work since we can call them up during regular business hours. All day long.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson