1 posted on
09/25/2003 7:11:33 AM PDT by
Pokey78
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: Pokey78
And, given that 48 per cent of the sample identified themselves as Democrats, what this poll seems to have found is that Clark attracts the 48 per cent youd expect him to plus a barely detectable smidgeonette of the rest. One would have to run a crosstab of Party Affiliation vs. Who Would You Vote For? to come to that conclusion. The above conclusion can not be arrived at looking at the sample as a whole.
Of course, you really can't extrapolate any of the results to the entire population, given the less than random nature of the sample (48% Democrats???).
I'd like to give the polling company the benefit of the doubt, but, I've seen too many of them trade their integrity for money.
The only use for a skewed sample, like this, is for propaganda.
At least 80% of the effort required to conduct a good poll is on keeping the sample random. Given this fact, I can only conclude that the polling company purposely skewed the results.
37 posted on
09/25/2003 8:27:23 AM PDT by
Strider
To: Pokey78
The more I see of Wesley Clark, the more he reminds me of that paranoid General, Jack Ripper,
in Dr. Strangelove.
To: Pokey78
Mark Steyn's biting wit makes me want to scream-- Yes, yes! Oh, God!! Yes!!! Aaaooooowwwwaaaooah!!!!
If there is a ping list for his articles, I wouldn't mind being on it.
To: Pokey78
Thats what he is to the public at the moment: None Of The Above in a Generals uniform. Now that is a perfect characterization of Clark's appeal!
To: Pokey78
On Howard Dean: To date, hes run a brilliant campaign and is the principal beneficiary of his partys visceral loathing of Bush and all his works. Hes poised to kill off two Democrat bigshots in the first two votes former House minority leader Dick Gephardt in the Iowa caucus and Senator Kerry in the New Hampshire primary. Is he going to sit back and let some Clinton stooge whos never run for anything steal the nomination away from him? Not if hes the same Howard Dean Ive spent a decade watching from my side of the Connecticut River. When the going gets tough, Dean gets mean.
Spot on. Howie ain't gonna go quietly. Look for an offensive against Clark next week. Dean will bloody and ravage anyone who tries to take the frontrunner spot away from him and he'll spoil the whole election for the Dims if that's what it takes. Howie is kind of a suicide-pact candidate. If he goes down, he'll try to take the rest down with him.
Howie will play the mad-dog role quite effectively, I think.
Dean is the nominee.
To: Pokey78
The Clintons are using Clark as a place card, just to keep the seat warm for Hill in case, come the spring, Bush looks weak enough to be going down. By then, Clark may be happy to settle for being Senator Rodhams running mate.
49 posted on
09/25/2003 8:54:32 AM PDT by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Pokey78
For weeks now, Senator Kerry has been saying that he only voted for the Congressional resolution authorising war with Iraq in order to persuade Saddam to comply with Hans Blix. It never occurred to the Senator that anyone would mistake his vote in favour of war as a vote in favour of war. Why, that was the very last thing on his mind! For someone whos supposed to be this seasons John McCain, Clark so far is doing a very good impression of the most tentative, equivocal and hair-splitting of the Democrat hacks hes supposed to be the straight-talking alternative to. THANK YOU THANK YOU for posting another of Steyn's brilliant pieces!
51 posted on
09/25/2003 8:57:20 AM PDT by
alwaysconservative
("If you can't change your mind, are you sure you still have one?" Maxine)
To: scholar; Bullish; linear; yoda swings
Ping
52 posted on
09/25/2003 9:12:15 AM PDT by
knighthawk
(And we all cry for freedom with your fists in the sky)
To: Pokey78
[ polls of registered voters are less accurate than polls of likely voters ]
Hmmmmmm... sounds like a lot of dead people are voting.. multiple times maybe.. maybe a few illegals thrown in.
53 posted on
09/25/2003 9:24:52 AM PDT by
hosepipe
To: Pokey78
From Arkansas, Bill went on to Washington; his successor as governor, Jim Guy Tucker, went on to jail. Jim Guy Tucker was convicted and resigned from office - but he did not go to jail.
66 posted on
09/25/2003 11:35:15 AM PDT by
HAL9000
To: Allan
bump
69 posted on
09/25/2003 12:28:44 PM PDT by
Allan
To: Pokey78
LOL:
If I were a Democrat, my main priority for the party would be to get the car keys back from Bill Clinton.
73 posted on
09/25/2003 2:23:26 PM PDT by
GOPJ
To: Pokey78
bump
75 posted on
09/25/2003 9:13:00 PM PDT by
GOPJ
To: Pokey78
Thanks poket...Terrific Steyn!
76 posted on
09/26/2003 1:21:34 AM PDT by
lainde
To: Pokey78
With the addition of the newest dwarf, Wesley Clark...Monica Lewinsky might as well run...she was the ultimate mouthpiece for Bill Clinton. She would move to the head immediately.
84 posted on
09/26/2003 4:07:04 AM PDT by
PGalt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson