Skip to comments.
Federal Do Not Call List (Time to Freep)
Self
 | 09/24-3
Posted on 09/24/2003 8:20:43 PM PDT by Dr. Marten
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-27 next  last
    
To: Dr. Marten
    I concur.
2
posted on 
09/24/2003 8:22:31 PM PDT
by 
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
 
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: Dr. Marten
    Ping me when you get the number and I will call....
5
posted on 
09/24/2003 8:27:53 PM PDT
by 
BlessedAmerican
(Pray for our President and those who are fighting to preserve our freedom!)
 
To: Dr. Marten
    I was gonna add to the keywords...but there wasn't any more room.
6
posted on 
09/24/2003 8:27:55 PM PDT
by 
Focault's Pendulum
(I apologise for not posting more....I finally got a real job.)
 
To: Dr. Marten
7
posted on 
09/24/2003 8:28:47 PM PDT
by 
Bogey78O
(The Clinton's have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured/killed -Peach)
 
To: ike89
    Not all phone companies have that option.
8
posted on 
09/24/2003 8:34:50 PM PDT
by 
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
 
To: ike89
    I don't have voice-mail. Do i have to have voice-mail to avail myself of this service ? If so, then it's not a solution.
 
 Here's one of many "pay for" services that are available.
 http://www.remove.org/?source=google&cat=phone_nocall
9
posted on 
09/24/2003 8:35:17 PM PDT
by 
stylin19a
(is it vietnam yet ?)
 
To: ike89
    Yeah but the phone is your private property. You should have the right to say who can and can't use it. The government can't intrude on this 4th amendment right, why should slimy telemarketers be allowed? We shouldn't have to sue for our privacy. I say we win one for the Constitution here.
10
posted on 
09/24/2003 8:42:50 PM PDT
by 
God is good
(Till we meet in the golden city of the New Jerusalem, peace to my brothers and sisters.)
 
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: God is good
    Yeah but the phone is your private property.
 
 Don't pay the bill and see if your phone is "your private property". 
The government can't intrude on this 4th amendment right, why should slimy telemarketers be allowed?
 "Telemarketers" are not the gov't. 
We shouldn't have to sue for our privacy. I say we win one for the Constitution here.
 
 Please point out where the word "privacy" exists in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or Amendments.
 
To: Dr. Marten
    Your post gave me an idea:
 How 'bout every time a telemarketer calls you, the phone company automatically
 charges him 25-cents and credits it to your bill?
13
posted on 
09/24/2003 9:12:22 PM PDT
by 
jigsaw
(Liberals: nature’s proof that maturity is not guaranteed.)
 
To: GoOrdnance
    very well put. I can decide if I want to answer the phone or not, thank you very much mr. nanny state.
14
posted on 
09/24/2003 9:15:34 PM PDT
by 
CanisRex
("That is all.  You may go now." Doc Holliday - Tombstone)
 
To: Dr. Marten
    The phone company owns the phone services that they offer you. While they avail their services to you, the telemarketeers are paying for the same service from the phone company. Telephone service can not be a one-way street.
15
posted on 
09/24/2003 10:03:52 PM PDT
by 
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
 
To: Dr. Marten
    I wonder if any FReepers out there make a living either directly or indirectly from telemarketers? Quite a few sales jobs depend on this albeit intrusive form of marketing. If it didn't work, no companies would be using it as a form of marketing.
 (Ducking all of the phones that are being thrown at me)
16
posted on 
09/24/2003 10:08:57 PM PDT
by 
natewill
(Start the revolution NOW!)
 
To: Rodney King
    This nation wide Do Not Call list better be put in place soon! 
Let's take a poll...what would be the most effective way to have telemarketers stop calling?
 1. Tell them to take your name and number off of their list. 
2. Regale them with stories of last Christmas when the family all came to stay at your house and Aunt Betsy's Depends sprung a leak...
 3. Tell them you have another call and then set the phone down and walk away. 
4. Blowhorn
5. Have your four-year old "practice" talking to Grandpa on the phone. 
6. Tell them you are taking off all of your clothes, give them a bit of phone hanky-panky, and then tell them you are charging $9.99 for the first minute and $15.00 for every minute after that.
 7. Revert to smoke signals.
 8. Yet again, thank God that you were born deaf.
 9. Have ethnic mother barrage them with a bunch of questions about personal issues and then give them a guilt trip.
To: thegreatbeast
    "Telephone service can not be a one-way street." 
 
You are absolutely right, but we also have a right to our privacy. If we can place signs of 'no solicitation" outside of our homes and our businesses, why can't we do it with our telephones? 
 
Hey, just let the telemarketer give me his home phone number since the service is not a one way street. I will be happy to call and pester the crap out of him during his family time. 
18
posted on 
09/25/2003 9:03:08 AM PDT
by 
Dr. Marten
(Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it)
 
To: CanisRex
    "I can decide if I want to answer the phone or not" 
 
Yeah, that's right you can...but at the same time it's really quite annoying when your awakened from sleep only to find out that it is a call you dont want to answer. Especially when you have elderly people who live with you and are constantly being disturbed by solicitors who are more than willing to take advantage of them when you are not around to intercept the calls. 
 
I should have the right to not have to make the decision as to whether or not I want to answer the call or not. If Telepests want to start paying my phone bill, then by all means..let them call away. Until then, DO NOT CALL.
19
posted on 
09/25/2003 9:09:59 AM PDT
by 
Dr. Marten
(Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it)
 
To: GoOrdnance
    The filter should be standards. It's not govt regulation.
20
posted on 
09/25/2003 9:12:23 AM PDT
by 
Cronos
(W2004)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-27 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson