Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anger at Vatican plan to ban altar girls
Gaurdian (UK) ^ | 24 September 2003 | John Hooper

Posted on 09/24/2003 3:06:09 PM PDT by Lorianne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 401-416 next last
To: stanz
Just trying to be logical here.

An admirable goal.

What do you think the church's priorities should be?

Restoring orthodoxy and orthopraxy to the Church.

Straightening out the legal mess or stifling members of the flock?

Anyone who believes that banning altar girls is "stifling" was never a member of the flock to begin with.

Altar girls began as a deliberate act of disobedience.

61 posted on 09/24/2003 3:45:53 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Neither of these "reasons" hold water (and pardon the multiple puns). Yes, these excuses are spouted out by many, but so what?

1. Whether it started out as act of disobedience or not is neither here nor there. Rosa Parks refusing to move to the back of the bus was an act of disobedience, and thank God for that. The origins of the practice have nothing to do with whether it is right or wrong TODAY.

2. This practice does not interfere with recruitment to the priesthood. Boys can still be altar boys, and if it influences them to become priests, then great. Whether or not there is a girl standing next to a 10 - 14 year old boy (the age of altar servers) during the mass is not going to affect a young man's decision to enter the priesthood when he is 18 - 20.
62 posted on 09/24/2003 3:46:13 PM PDT by Cousin Eddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stanz
The Church's priority should be what it has always been: preaching the Gospel to the ends of the Earth, and baptising all nations in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.

Kowtowing to the radical feminazis and flaming queers, as too many bishops have done for the last third to half century, is what stifles the flock.

63 posted on 09/24/2003 3:47:19 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
those of us who don't blindly agree with everything that comes out of the Vatican.

In other words, apostates.

Catholics obey the Holy See. Non-Catholics don't.

64 posted on 09/24/2003 3:47:23 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
They don't have enough priests and they are working very hard to alienate their largest group of active members, women.

I have some questions for you in this event:

Since you have identified that Catholicism has a problem attracting men, should they decide to abandon men and focus on women? Would that strategy benefit women or be detrimental to women?

Not just in Catholicism, but other Christian denominations their is often the problem that women are the largest group of active members? Has this benefited these women? Have you ever known women who complain about this very fact?

65 posted on 09/24/2003 3:47:28 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
You have a sewer of a mind.

Excuse me??? the church has been protecting child perverts and you accuse me of having a sewer mind. I wouldn't think anything like this if it didn't happen to be in the news for the last few years. Decades of the church priests having sex with little boys with protection from above. And what problem does the church find to deal...? girl alter boys. Go figure

66 posted on 09/24/2003 3:47:44 PM PDT by SouthernFreebird (constipated people don't give a crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
That's one of the stupidest remarks I've ever seem anywhere. You should be proud of yourself! That's quite a feat.
67 posted on 09/24/2003 3:48:49 PM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
There is an old theological principle called lex orandi, lex credendi, which essentially means that the way in which you worship God reflects the way you think about God. Clapping hands to congratulate creatures at a time specifically reserved for reverent song or silent prayer to God implies that creatures deserve more attention than God in His own house.

The time, to which you refer, has been specifically reserved by man, not God. The way I think about God, is that an event which brings joy to his creatures, would be pleasing to God as well. Therefore, God might very well be leading the applause. Provided God has hands, of course.
68 posted on 09/24/2003 3:50:10 PM PDT by tarmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Dimentia?
69 posted on 09/24/2003 3:50:22 PM PDT by hilaryrhymeswithrich (As my seven year old says.....George Bush Rocks!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
The only Catholic parishes that are both gaining in numbers and producing new vocations are conservative parishes where altar girls are unknown.

That's not true, of course, but why not just issue sweeping generalizations to back up your point of view?

Female altar servers are a sideshow in this document.

What this article doesn't reveal is that there are also proposed restrictions on communion in the hand and under both kinds, both of which would never fly in the United States.

It's obvious that a coterie of reactionaries decided to issue a trial balloon, and it is quickly losing air, as bishops and cardinals, in other versions of this article, have said "these will never be accepted."

Trying to restrict quotations in homilies to Scripture alone? How silly. Bishop Fulton Sheen wouldn't have been able to give half the homilies he did, as he liberally quoted Shakespeare, and Chesterton, and Hammersjkold, and even Popes!

Or banning clapping for a newly baptized baby or new confirmand, or when the Pope processes in at Mass? Ludicrous.

What are these dolts thinking?

70 posted on 09/24/2003 3:51:10 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from a shelter! You'll save at least one life, maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: SouthernFreebird
Excuse me?

I find that difficult to do. The Church hierarchy proposes banning a theologically problematic practice which began as a subversive act of defiance to politically incorrect theology, and all you can think of is pederasty.

I'm sorry. I feel that I may have insulted the sewers of the world.

71 posted on 09/24/2003 3:52:02 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Even non-Catholics like myself can see that removing altar girls from the church, would be a good thing. :)

If the Catholic Church has a set of rules or traditions that make them uniquely Catholic, then why would anyone who doesn't believe with these rules want to remain in such a church? To change the rules, and go against everything that the Church deems holy or important, weakens the Church, and doesn't strengthen it. It will cease to be the Catholic Church, if obstructionists have their way. The Church must protect itself.
72 posted on 09/24/2003 3:52:25 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
No alter girls is just restating what is already the rule. I think this part is good. There is nothing wrong with working to re-educate people to the different roles of men and women in life.
73 posted on 09/24/2003 3:53:55 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Dear Lorianne,

I just asked my wife, who is a Catholic, a woman, and a mother.

She's not offended.

The next generation here will continue to be reared Catholic.


sitetest
74 posted on 09/24/2003 3:54:15 PM PDT by sitetest (The Catholics who love the innovations best are the ones already missing from the pews on Sunday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Like when the King of England wanted a divorce and the Pope said no.

Why did the king & the pope divorce? They seemed so happy together!

And anyway.....were they fighting over the kids, the money, or what?

75 posted on 09/24/2003 3:54:45 PM PDT by Republic If You Can Keep It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
They don't have enough priests and they are working very hard to alienate their largest group of active members, women

You have identified that women are the largest groupof active members among Catholics. Yet until recently, there were no altar girls. If altar girls were a deciding factor in alienating women, then why have women been the largest group of active members throughout the Church history?

76 posted on 09/24/2003 3:54:52 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cousin Eddie
This practice does not interfere with recruitment to the priesthood. Boys can still be altar boys, and if it influences them to become priests, then great. Whether or not there is a girl standing next to a 10 - 14 year old boy (the age of altar servers) during the mass is not going to affect a young man's decision to enter the priesthood when he is 18 - 20.

Of course it doesn't. Most of the men entering seminaries today are in the mid-20s, after college, far after the days when they were serving at an altar.

There's other stuff in this "draft" that is far more insidious than restricting the use of altar girls.

77 posted on 09/24/2003 3:55:58 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from a shelter! You'll save at least one life, maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
Unbelievable. We complain about feminazis, about leftists claiming our young girls and twisting them, and they want to ban something that keeps at least some of them grounded? Are they insane?

Christian priesthood and conducting services is for men only.

78 posted on 09/24/2003 3:56:14 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
This in no way alienates me....just one Catholic woman's opinion.

I had along conversation with my brother last night about a similar topic. We all know the rules of the organizations we join be it Church, school etc. Barring any obvious evil,if we don't like the rules it isn't fair to those who do buy into them to insist on changing them just because you (the universal you) don't like them. The option is always there for you to find a group that fits.
79 posted on 09/24/2003 3:56:20 PM PDT by hilaryrhymeswithrich (As my seven year old says.....George Bush Rocks!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
No but I've heard priests and Catholic school teachers complain about the lack of males in church, and the lack of men active in their children's religious education. It is largely women who are responsible for bringing up the next generation of in the Church, or not.

It would seem logical to me that the church would want more men to participate (and more European origin people), but at the same time, alienating the groups who are currently the most active in the Church (women and non-European descent peoples) doesn't appear to me to be a good game plan.

80 posted on 09/24/2003 3:56:26 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 401-416 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson