I am ashamed that John Conyers is from Michigan. (To borrow from the Ditzy Chicks)
1 posted on
09/24/2003 12:50:36 PM PDT by
Pest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: Pest
"I think it's patriotic to ask those questions," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. Is Senator Leahy using campaign contributions to prop up Communists in Venezuela? I think it's patriotic to ask those questions.
35 posted on
09/24/2003 1:15:05 PM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(This Islamofascism has been brought to you by Saudi Arabia!)
To: Pest
Ted Kennedy. Good senator, but a bad date.
To: Pest
Massachusetts Air Bag
To: Pest
"The White House should immediately apologize to Senator Kennedy for calling his legitimate criticism of the rush to war 'uncivil,'" Conyers said. Oh, I get it. Kennedy accuses Bush of what would be a crime, but Bush must apologize for questioning Kennedy's manners.
John Conyers is a senile old racist partisan fool.
52 posted on
09/24/2003 1:32:49 PM PDT by
CaptRon
To: Pest
HEY FATSO!
""We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA), Sept. 27, 2002. "
SIT YOUR FAT ASS DOWN AND STFU!
55 posted on
09/24/2003 1:37:11 PM PDT by
aShepard
To: Pest
Maybe if instead of attacking Bush, Kennedy and other Democrats were supporting his efforts to fight this war, we'd have more luck getting the international support that they say they want.
To: ClancyJ
ping
65 posted on
09/24/2003 1:52:33 PM PDT by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
To: Pest
"We ought to have the opportunity to have open, candid exchange of views ... without challenging the motives, patriotism or the very right of every senator to express," him or herself, said Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D. "There has to be open dialogue about the extraordinary issues facing us with respect to Iraq." "I think it's patriotic to ask those questions," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.
Helllllllooooooooo, you thick-headed lunkheads. (Not you, Pest. Daschle and Leahy, of course).
Didn't Kennedy "challenge the motives" of President Bush???
Hm?
Good grief. They want to dish it out but can't take it. Boo Hoo.
69 posted on
09/24/2003 1:54:49 PM PDT by
cyncooper
(I believe VP Cheney)
To: Pest
Pathetic democrats....every last one of them...
74 posted on
09/24/2003 2:04:24 PM PDT by
smiley
To: Pest
When it comes to Kennedy,do you think its just the alcohol talking?Its not very wise to put much stock in the ramblings of a common drunk.
To: Pest
This is Bush's own fault for trying to play NICE NICE with an abortion loving left wing druken reprobate who should have been politically dead back in '69
That also holds true for all the other alley fighting left wingers in the senate that Bush trys to be nice to
He utterly fails to grasp the inherent EVIL in the democrat party
81 posted on
09/24/2003 2:26:44 PM PDT by
uncbob
( building tomorrow)
To: Pest
I'm thinking maybe some of Kennedy's constituents organize one of those confrontation things (you know, when a family gangs up against the offender) and drag him off to a 90-day rehab program of some kind.
85 posted on
09/24/2003 3:42:35 PM PDT by
Maria S
(“I know a little bit about how White Houses work.” Hillary Clinton, 8/26/03)
To: Pest
Bennett said if Kennedy has some accusations to make, then he ought to put up or shut up when it comes to providing the evidence.THANK YOU FOR SAYING THIS, SENATOR BENNETT!
If the Rats truly believe that President Bush made up the pretense for the war in Iraq in order to gain political points, or to benefit his donors in the oil and defense industries, then they need to initiate impeachment proceedings . If bribing foreign governments and causing the deaths of hundreds of US servicemen and thousands of Iraqis for political profit doesn't rise the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors," then nothing does.
So come on, Treason Party, why don't you put your money where your mouth is, and draft up those articles of impeachment? If you can make the case in front of the American people that President Bush is indeed guilty as accused by you, then we'll overwhelmingly vote to kick him out of office.
What's that, you can't do that? Then either you're too chickens**t to stand by your (so-called) principles because you're afraid you'll take a hit in the polls by trying to remove a popular wartime president from office, or you're just running off at the mouth, flinging baseless accusations around in the media in the hopes that some of the filth will stick in the public's mind. So either back it up, or STFU and stay quiet until you have something constructive to add to the debate.
88 posted on
09/24/2003 4:03:04 PM PDT by
CFC__VRWC
(AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - don't liberals just kill ya?)
To: Pest
Saddam Hussein making it tough on himself. He's in the wrong place.
Instead of changing beds every two hours in Tikrit he should be in the US Senate shrieking baseless accusations right along with his ideological equals, the Democrats. He would fit right in and probably be a better Senator than most of them. He would also be more effective destroying American policy, just like them.
The Media would love him, too.
90 posted on
09/24/2003 4:27:43 PM PDT by
Gritty
To: Pest
Still, some Democrats tried to distance themselves from the situation, saying Americans should know what's going on behind-the-scenes in Iraq. Just like we should know about what happened in Yugoslavia and Sudan. But that was a different administration.
.
96 posted on
09/26/2003 2:13:56 PM PDT by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson