Skip to comments.
Congress Heats Up Over Kennedy Remarks
Fox News ^
| September 24, 2003
| Brian Wilson, Julie Asher, Jim Mills and Liza Porteus
Posted on 09/24/2003 12:50:36 PM PDT by Pest
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:37:16 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: conyers; kennedy; michigan; tedkennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 last
To: Pest
This is Bush's own fault for trying to play NICE NICE with an abortion loving left wing druken reprobate who should have been politically dead back in '69
That also holds true for all the other alley fighting left wingers in the senate that Bush trys to be nice to
He utterly fails to grasp the inherent EVIL in the democrat party
81
posted on
09/24/2003 2:26:44 PM PDT
by
uncbob
( building tomorrow)
To: judicial meanz
You forgot, manslaughterer.
To: ElkGroveDan
Great idea!
To: votelife
If Romney runs against him.
We can put this prediction in a sealed envelope to be opened in '06 or '08? His age group is dying off - the so called Kennedy mystique means little to younger voters.
84
posted on
09/24/2003 3:12:17 PM PDT
by
Let's Roll
(And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
To: Pest
I'm thinking maybe some of Kennedy's constituents organize one of those confrontation things (you know, when a family gangs up against the offender) and drag him off to a 90-day rehab program of some kind.
85
posted on
09/24/2003 3:42:35 PM PDT
by
Maria S
(“I know a little bit about how White Houses work.” Hillary Clinton, 8/26/03)
To: dirtboy
Conyers is an idiot. During the impeachment hearings, only Maxine Waters and Sheila Jackson Lee kept him from being the biggest fool in the room. On the other hand, the notion of a Republican "counterattack" in nonsnese. They're wussies, especially in the Senate. Ted-zilla is a fool. Ignore him. Maybe the pubbies could use their new-found nerve to get some freepin' judges approved. Whata bunch of wimps.
86
posted on
09/24/2003 3:46:11 PM PDT
by
wny
Comment #87 Removed by Moderator
To: Pest
Bennett said if Kennedy has some accusations to make, then he ought to put up or shut up when it comes to providing the evidence.THANK YOU FOR SAYING THIS, SENATOR BENNETT!
If the Rats truly believe that President Bush made up the pretense for the war in Iraq in order to gain political points, or to benefit his donors in the oil and defense industries, then they need to initiate impeachment proceedings . If bribing foreign governments and causing the deaths of hundreds of US servicemen and thousands of Iraqis for political profit doesn't rise the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors," then nothing does.
So come on, Treason Party, why don't you put your money where your mouth is, and draft up those articles of impeachment? If you can make the case in front of the American people that President Bush is indeed guilty as accused by you, then we'll overwhelmingly vote to kick him out of office.
What's that, you can't do that? Then either you're too chickens**t to stand by your (so-called) principles because you're afraid you'll take a hit in the polls by trying to remove a popular wartime president from office, or you're just running off at the mouth, flinging baseless accusations around in the media in the hopes that some of the filth will stick in the public's mind. So either back it up, or STFU and stay quiet until you have something constructive to add to the debate.
88
posted on
09/24/2003 4:03:04 PM PDT
by
CFC__VRWC
(AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - don't liberals just kill ya?)
To: Tarl
Thanks. With a late Tuesday night and an early Wednesday morning, brain fog was obscuring my way.
89
posted on
09/24/2003 4:09:29 PM PDT
by
tbpiper
To: Pest
Saddam Hussein making it tough on himself. He's in the wrong place.
Instead of changing beds every two hours in Tikrit he should be in the US Senate shrieking baseless accusations right along with his ideological equals, the Democrats. He would fit right in and probably be a better Senator than most of them. He would also be more effective destroying American policy, just like them.
The Media would love him, too.
90
posted on
09/24/2003 4:27:43 PM PDT
by
Gritty
To: Gritty
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002 "For years" he says, that implies his belief in WMD goes well beyond any excuse of being "duped" by intelligence briefings given immediately before the President's State of the Union Address.
91
posted on
09/24/2003 5:33:37 PM PDT
by
Tarl
("Men killing men, feeling no pain...the world is a gutter - ENUFF Z'NUFF")
To: ElkGroveDan
Bump,agreed and Kennedy needs a drink! And about Arnold, at the debate tonight:
Actor Arnold Schwarzenegger was criticized for supporting a divisive ballot initiative nine years ago that would have prevented services for the children of illegal immigrants.
92
posted on
09/24/2003 8:39:26 PM PDT
by
JustPiper
(Ted needs a drink- Our "W" is NOT a ONE term President !!!)
To: cyncooper
Helllllllooooooooo, you thick-headed lunkheads. (Not you, Pest. Daschle and Leahy, of course). Thanks for the clarification! :)
93
posted on
09/25/2003 5:37:44 AM PDT
by
Pest
To: Lijahsbubbe
"I know for sure he won't lose any mass."
LOL! Hopefully, Rats will loose en masse!
94
posted on
09/25/2003 6:41:07 AM PDT
by
bk1000
(one of these days I simply MUST come up with a decent tag line.)
To: Pest
Still, some Democrats tried to distance themselves from the situation, saying Americans should know what's going on behind-the-scenes in Iraq. Just like we should know about what happened in Yugoslavia and Sudan. But that was a different administration.
.
96
posted on
09/26/2003 2:13:56 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson