Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: areafiftyone
He said it will also claim that Saddam Hussein mounted a huge programme to deceive and hinder the work of US weapons inspectors.

So either Saddam did have WMDs to hide, or Saddam was, in effect, framing himself for the crime of having WMDs. In either case, isn't it clear that Saddam is to blame for any WMD confusion?

2 posted on 09/24/2003 7:36:09 AM PDT by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DWPittelli
More diversion. Perhaps some freepers owe an apology to Hans Blix who, unlike them, was apparently right on the money about WMD.
4 posted on 09/24/2003 7:39:25 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DWPittelli
So either Saddam did have WMDs to hide, or Saddam was, in effect, framing himself for the crime of having WMDs. In either case, isn't it clear that Saddam is to blame for any WMD confusion?

Huh??????? I really don't follow that. Saddy was a tyrant who had to go. Yeah, he didn't have WMDs, he said he didn't have WMDs and so he didn't lie about THAT at least, but that doesn't exonerate him. How do you make it that he framed himself?????
10 posted on 09/24/2003 7:57:29 AM PDT by Cronos (W2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson