Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DWPittelli
So either Saddam did have WMDs to hide, or Saddam was, in effect, framing himself for the crime of having WMDs. In either case, isn't it clear that Saddam is to blame for any WMD confusion?

Huh??????? I really don't follow that. Saddy was a tyrant who had to go. Yeah, he didn't have WMDs, he said he didn't have WMDs and so he didn't lie about THAT at least, but that doesn't exonerate him. How do you make it that he framed himself?????
10 posted on 09/24/2003 7:57:29 AM PDT by Cronos (W2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos
Cronos: How do you make it that he framed himself?

First, he certainly lied and kept weapons more recently than 10 years ago; he was about to get a clean bill of health from the inspectors in 1995, until his sons-in-law defected to Jordan and spilled the beans. Given that history (and the absence of people willing to cross Saddam after he had his sons-in-law executed), it was natural that any inspection regime would be apt to be skeptical in the face of ambiguous information.

Despite this, Iraq obstructed inspectors, delayed inspections, refused to update the documents presented last year from those presented years earlier, and frightened scientists into not talking to the inspectors. In short, Iraq acted guilty, as even the favorite source for the Iraq apologists, Hans Blix, stated recently.

36 posted on 09/24/2003 12:51:11 PM PDT by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson