Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Analysis of Arnold Schwarzenegger's Environmental Policy
Arnold Schwarzenegger's Website / Vanity | Sept. 23, 2003 | Mark Edward Vande Pol, aka, Carry_Okie

Posted on 09/23/2003 1:59:55 PM PDT by Carry_Okie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last

1 posted on 09/23/2003 1:59:56 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast; EggsAckley; sasquatch; hedgetrimmer; LisaAnne; Sir Francis Dashwood; ...
Ping for discussion.
2 posted on 09/23/2003 2:02:18 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr; onyx; PhiKapMom; Tamsey; redlipstick; habs4ever; My2Cents; South40; ...
PING
3 posted on 09/23/2003 2:02:42 PM PDT by EggsAckley (......................whatever...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Thank you for the ping. I will definitely read it tonight when I get home.
4 posted on 09/23/2003 2:04:15 PM PDT by LisaAnne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Benedict Arnold is being exposed for what he is: a clueless, godless, facist phony. Apparently some of Daddy's genes did get into the Terminator's circuits. Go Tom Go!
5 posted on 09/23/2003 2:06:35 PM PDT by Russell Scott (Without massive intervention from Heaven, America doesn't have a prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Wow! Appears outstanding at first glance, and I'm bookmarking for further review.

Thanks for all your hard work!

6 posted on 09/23/2003 2:06:35 PM PDT by NittanyLion (Go Tom Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Go get 'em!

Richard F.
7 posted on 09/23/2003 2:06:35 PM PDT by rdf (co-chair of "yes on 209", GOP chair, Vta County CA, '92)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Go get 'em!

Richard F.
8 posted on 09/23/2003 2:06:35 PM PDT by rdf (co-chair of "yes on 209", GOP chair, Vta County CA, '92)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Hm. I did a search.

The word "Bustamante" does not occur once.

That has to mean the author did not ask the only important question: "Is his policy worse than Bustamante's?"

Just another Arnold-bashing. A really wordy one.

Meanwhile, back in the Real World, where we have TWO choices, Bustamante or Schwarzenegger....

Dan
9 posted on 09/23/2003 2:06:46 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LisaAnne
You are quite welcome.
10 posted on 09/23/2003 2:06:54 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Just another Arnold-bashing. A really wordy one.

If you think this is just bashing, I would like to see your rationale based upon a logical disputation of the evidence.

11 posted on 09/23/2003 2:09:03 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Read my whole post. It's a lot shorter than yours. ANd more relevant to the election.

Dan
12 posted on 09/23/2003 2:09:49 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Thanks for all your hard work!

Thank you.

13 posted on 09/23/2003 2:10:37 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
I did. I have no respect for the argument.
14 posted on 09/23/2003 2:11:47 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Then I have no interest in your analysis.
15 posted on 09/23/2003 2:12:16 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BibChr; Admin Moderator
You didn't in the first place. Your interest is in abusing this forum for your own purposes.
16 posted on 09/23/2003 2:14:17 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Russell Scott
Wow, Arnold's a fascist ( note the proper spelling ). Looks like the TomCruzers are really reaching.
17 posted on 09/23/2003 2:14:57 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (There is no shame in being poor, just dressing poorly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Looks like the TomCruzers are really reaching.

No, the policy is fascism. I don't think Arnold wrote it.

18 posted on 09/23/2003 2:16:17 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
...for reading later.
19 posted on 09/23/2003 2:19:57 PM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Some of AS's stuff I like. Some, I'm of two minds about. Most, however, I don't like, esp. that stuff about the "false choice" between jobs and environment. Maybe SOMEtimes it's posed as a false choice, but to every choice there is a cost (or forgone benefit) and a potential benefit (or avoided cost). Maybe we don't always know what the dollar figures are, hence the need for an arbitrary "dollar value of a life" (or "of avoiding contracting cancer") in most cost / benefit analyses.

It's a little icky to have to assign value like that, but it's simply liberal nonsense to refuse to assign ANY value and to insist that weighing costs against benefits is somehow an invalid "evil corporations" approach.
20 posted on 09/23/2003 2:20:22 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson