To: BibChr; Admin Moderator
You didn't in the first place. Your interest is in abusing this forum for your own purposes.
16 posted on
09/23/2003 2:14:17 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
To: Carry_Okie; Admin Moderator; Tamsey; FairOpinion; EggsAckley; onyx; DoughtyOne; redlipstick
LOL! Not being interested in one of your windy essays, and daring to say so, is your idea of "abuse"?!
Wow, life must be fun around you!
Say, Admin Moderator -- can I force everyone to be interested in everything I write, too, and to withhold all criticism?
Dan
22 posted on
09/23/2003 2:24:27 PM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Carry_Okie; BibChr
Dan, take it easy. And Mark, Dan's posts, however wanting they may have been as a matter of debating points, don't warrant a narcking to Admin Mods as some sort of rules violation. They aren't personally abusive, etc.
Dan: You could make your point -- namely that however left-loony Arnold's enviro-policies may be, they don't change your view that "it's either Cruz or Arnold" and that Arnold is substantially less bad than Cruz -- better with honey than with vinegar. (To misplace a metaphor.)
23 posted on
09/23/2003 2:29:44 PM PDT by
pogo101
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson