Posted on 09/23/2003 6:00:10 AM PDT by joesnuffy
Reporting for duty: Wesley Clark
Posted: September 23, 2003 1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2003 David H. Hackworth
With Wesley Clark joining the Democratic presidential candidates, there are enough eager bodies pointed toward the White House to make up a rifle squad. This bunch of wannabes could make things increasingly hot for Dubya – as long as they don't blow each other away with friendly fire.
Since Clark tossed his steel pot into the inferno, I've been constantly asked, "Hack, what do you think of the general?"
For the record, I never served with Clark. But after spending three hours interviewing the man for Maxim's November issue, I'm impressed. He is insightful, he has his act together, he understands what makes national security tick – and he thinks on his feet somewhere around Mach 3. No big surprise, since he graduated first in his class from West Point, which puts him in the supersmart set with Robert E. Lee, Douglas MacArthur and Maxwell Taylor.
Clark was so brilliant, he was whisked off to Oxford as a Rhodes scholar and didn't get his boots into the Vietnam mud until well after his 1966 West Point class came close to achieving the academy record for the most Purple Hearts in any one war. When he finally got there, he took over a 1st Infantry Division rifle company and was badly wounded.
Lt. Gen. James Hollingsworth, one of our Army's most distinguished war heroes, says: "Clark took a burst of AK fire, but didn't stop fighting. He stayed on the field 'til his mission was accomplished and his boys were safe. He was awarded the Silver Star and Purple Heart. And he earned 'em."
It took months for Clark to get back in shape. He had the perfect excuse, but he didn't quit the Army to scale the corporate peaks as so many of our best and brightest did back then. Instead, he took a demoralized company of short-timers at Fort Knox who were suffering from a Vietnam hangover and made them the best on post – a major challenge in 1970 when our Army was teetering on the edge of anarchy. Then he stuck around to become one of the young Turks who forged the Green Machine into the magnificent sword Norman Schwarzkopf swung so skillfully during Round One of the Gulf War.
I asked Clark why he didn't turn in his bloody soldier suit for Armani and the big civvy dough that was definitely his for the asking.
His response: "I wanted to serve my country."
He says he now wants to lead America out of the darkness, shorten what promises to be the longest and nastiest war in our history and restore our eroding prestige around the world.
For sure, he'll be strong on defense. But with his high moral standards and because he knows where and how the game's played, there will probably be zero tolerance for either Pentagon porking or two-bit shenanigans.
No doubt he's made his share of enemies. He doesn't suffer fools easily and wouldn't have allowed the dilettantes who convinced Dubya to do Iraq to even cut the White House lawn. So he should prepare for a fair amount of dart-throwing from detractors he's ripped into during the past three decades.
Hey, I am one of those: I took a swing at Clark during the Kosovo campaign when I thought he screwed up the operation, and I called him a "Perfumed Prince." Only years later did I discover from his book and other research that I was wrong – the blame should have been worn by British timidity and William Cohen, U.S. SecDef at the time.
At the interview, Clark came along without the standard platoon of handlers and treated the little folks who poured the coffee and served the bacon and eggs with exactly the same respect and consideration he gave the biggies in the dining room like my colleague Larry King and Bob Tisch, the Regency Hotel's owner. An appealing common touch.
But if he wins the election, don't expect an Andrew Jackson field-soldier type. Clark's an intellectual, and his military career is more like Ike's – that of a staff guy and a brilliant high-level commander. Can he make tough decisions? Bet on it. Just like Ike did during his eight hard but prosperous years as president.
I will always respect Hack for his service to his country lo these many years ago, and have respected him as an advocate of the grunts out there on the ground. But, in this, he's above his pay grade. He used to have a great nose for senior officers bullshit, and he called Clark on it during the Clinton years. Now he's a fan? C'mon, Hack, you're getting to like those cocktail parties and pretty liberal girls who put out a little too much.
And remember Bob Dornan...
Presidential hopefull.
Who did not wear perfume......
First impressions are usually the most accurate.
If our so-called allies hate us now, they will despise America led by a general.
Clark reminds me of Jimmy Carter in camo.
Both are smart - they both graduated from military academies, but are they street wise?
Jimmy sure wasn't.
His total incompetence nearly choked-off the economy and helped light a fire under world terrorism.
America can do without another Carter clone.
Oh sure, that's why, six months after the fact, he's still pathetically confused about whether he "would have" supported the war or not.
Hack & Clark are soul-mates, though. They suffer from similar overdoses of arrogance.
Perfectly demonstrated when he had to call a flack to tell him whether or not to comment to the press pool outside of NBC's Meet the Press. He's a putz.
No, but poor old "Hack" sure does.
Yeah, buddy!
Not much difference between 'D'- Day and Bosnia, no sirree!
(Whatabunchacrap...)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.