1 posted on
09/23/2003 6:00:11 AM PDT by
joesnuffy
To: joesnuffy
Well, it looks like Hack's liberal meltdown is now complete.
2 posted on
09/23/2003 6:02:05 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(CongressmanBillyBob/John Armor for Congress - you can't separate them, so send 'em both to D.C.)
To: joesnuffy
Stick a fork in Hackworth. He's done.
3 posted on
09/23/2003 6:04:12 AM PDT by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: joesnuffy
6 posted on
09/23/2003 6:12:10 AM PDT by
LRS
To: joesnuffy
I called him a "Perfumed Prince."First impressions are usually the most accurate.
If our so-called allies hate us now, they will despise America led by a general.
Clark reminds me of Jimmy Carter in camo.
Both are smart - they both graduated from military academies, but are they street wise?
Jimmy sure wasn't.
His total incompetence nearly choked-off the economy and helped light a fire under world terrorism.
America can do without another Carter clone.
To: joesnuffy
" I'm impressed. He is insightful, he has his act together, he understands what makes national security tick and he thinks on his feet somewhere around Mach 3....." Oh sure, that's why, six months after the fact, he's still pathetically confused about whether he "would have" supported the war or not.
Hack & Clark are soul-mates, though. They suffer from similar overdoses of arrogance.
To: joesnuffy
When is Hackworth going to marry Arianna Huffington?
12 posted on
09/23/2003 6:19:55 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: joesnuffy
If one wondered, these last couple of years what in the world was happening to Hackworth, it is now apparent that he is a liberal democrat,finally out of the closet, now. Clark is no Eisenhower. He is more like a Military Clinton, if that can be inagined, than anything else, even before Carl Rove failed to return his WH phone call,(which WH switchboard records show Clark never placed).) I lost all respect for Col. Hackworth long ago, but now I see he has not gone totally mindless, he's just a liberal democrat.
Boggles the rational mind.
13 posted on
09/23/2003 6:20:25 AM PDT by
wingnuts'nbolts
(I agree with Dick Morris. Off with their heads! Let's start with the Clintons, all three of them.)
To: joesnuffy
Guess David is off his meds again.
14 posted on
09/23/2003 6:23:08 AM PDT by
mattdono
To: joesnuffy
Clark visited the Citadel yesterday.
The cadets assessment: Gore in uniform.
To: joesnuffy
"
He doesn't suffer fools easily ....... "
No, but poor old "Hack" sure does.
16 posted on
09/23/2003 6:31:49 AM PDT by
G.Mason
(Lessons of life need not be fatal)
To: joesnuffy
"Clark's an intellectual, and his military career is more like Ike's..."Yeah, buddy!
Not much difference between 'D'- Day and Bosnia, no sirree!
(Whatabunchacrap...)
19 posted on
09/23/2003 6:42:12 AM PDT by
Redbob
To: joesnuffy
Did anybody expect a lib like Hackworth would say anything differrent about a lib like Clark? Did you?
21 posted on
09/23/2003 6:44:55 AM PDT by
wastoute
To: joesnuffy
Hackworth is inching ever closer to joining the Scott Ritter School of LW Fruitloop Preachings.
23 posted on
09/23/2003 6:48:31 AM PDT by
finnman69
(!)
To: joesnuffy
He was so honorable serving his country and respected in that, but all his credibility is gone when he is Clintoon's General, an ardent supporter of Clintoon and a failure on military matters when they involve leading. He is not a leader. And their building up his military record is not going to do him good when he thinks Clintoon was a great President.
To: joesnuffy
But if he wins the election, don't expect an Andrew Jackson field-soldier type A good comparison. Jackson was a brilliant field commander and war hero. But Jackson became perhaps the most corrupt President in American history, and the only President to actually defy a Supreme Court order (which led to the "ethnic cleansing" of hundreds of thousands of Indians). Clark has already shown an indifference to human suffering...at Waco and in the Balkans. I fear for what kind of President her would make.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson