Skip to comments.
Images of smiling babies in the womb have pro-abortion activists screeching
Union Leader ^
| September 23, 2003
| Michelle Malkin
Posted on 09/23/2003 2:19:56 AM PDT by sarcasm
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
1
posted on
09/23/2003 2:19:56 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
To: sarcasm
These babies' smiles will never grace the covers of Time, Newsweek, NY Times, Wash. Post, etc.. or CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC newscasts. It is up to us to show them to as many people as we can.
2
posted on
09/23/2003 2:32:52 AM PDT
by
jaykay
("Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide" -- James Burnham)
To: sarcasm; All
Well, what else can be expected?
Once a woman sees that what she carries in her belly is not an "unviable tissue mass"-- but a baby- the pro-death arguments fade like shadows before the sunlight:
Ever since I heard of this new technology, I've maintained that it is the Stealth Bomber that is going to zoom in under the pro-death crowd's radar and nuke them... once a woman sees what is really in her womb, it ceases to be a "tissue mass" and becomes... a baby. Her baby.
3
posted on
09/23/2003 2:35:19 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(Abortion kills a beating heart...)
To: sarcasm
Allison Herwitt, director of government relations for NARAL Pro-Choice America in Washington, also attacked pro-life supporters of the bill. They dont want women to go to Planned Parenthood, where theyll get their full range of options, said Alison Herwitt. They just want them to go to crisis pregnancy centers, where women will be exposed to this weapon at taxpayers expense.
Wow, some weapon. It shows pictures of the baby. So much more harmfull then the weapons at Planned Parenthood.
4
posted on
09/23/2003 2:36:24 AM PDT
by
bitcon
To: sarcasm
Where's the pictures??
To: sarcasm
...will be picked up by those groups that use anything and everything to stop terminations but ignore the fact that (we believe) women have a right to choice (to kill their baby). (parenthesis mine)
Yup! Got that right, witch!
This is wonderful!
It removes any doubt from the equation. These women are not killing "blobs of fetal tissue" they are killing babies.
Their "right to choose" is definitely in the ropes and will not last much longer.
6
posted on
09/23/2003 2:45:45 AM PDT
by
Ronin
(When the fox gnaws -- smile!)
To: EternalVigilance
7
posted on
09/23/2003 2:58:53 AM PDT
by
jaykay
("Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide" -- James Burnham)
To: EternalVigilance
8
posted on
09/23/2003 2:59:15 AM PDT
by
backhoe
To: Ronin
Post the picture of the baby in the womb and the abortionists vacuum cleaner side by side. Then let the caption read "Which One Is A Weapon".
9
posted on
09/23/2003 3:00:38 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Ronin
~will be picked up by those groups that use anything and everything to stop terminations but ignore the fact that women have a right to choice~ Well, using their logic, I have a right to terminate that guy's life also. He's simply a blob of tissue that somehow escaped a womb.
Lucky guy, though. No matter how evil I think he is, I choose life.
Marie's Husband
10
posted on
09/23/2003 3:14:49 AM PDT
by
Marie Antoinette
(I'm too lazy to log myself in)
To: Sacajaweau
Excellent idea.
11
posted on
09/23/2003 3:32:06 AM PDT
by
Ronin
(When the fox gnaws -- smile!)
To: sarcasm
Abortion, to me, is butchering a baby. The proponents do not want witnesses to the little person being murdered. These photos demonstrate that babies are not blobs when people do not want them..They are human beings, just like Lacy Peterson's little Conner. I surely do hope that, after all these years people will begin to understand that abortion is, indeed, a vicious crime against our most helpless. Our nation and the world certainly is in a lot of moral trouble..
12
posted on
09/23/2003 3:40:19 AM PDT
by
jazzlite
(esat)
To: sarcasm
I read an article in a parenting magazine about this rechnology seems it is actually reducing the nymber of abortions.
To: smadurski
oops technology sorry its late
To: sarcasm
Thanks for this article, and thanks to Michelle Malkin for more of her hard hitting writing
To: sarcasm
It's worth pointing out that only about 10% of abortions are done after 12 weeks - about 60% are done at or before 8-9 weeks, and about 88% are done at or before 12 weeks. While those pictures of the babies are cool, they aren't really relevant to the overwhelming majority of the abortions done in the US.
Snidely
To: sarcasm
Anne Karpf, a commentator for the British-based Guardian who bills herself as a medical sociologist, says the photos are deeply disquieting and ridicules the anti-abortion lobby for being intoxicated with evidence of a fetus humanity.Evil finds truth to be "deeply disquieting". Good. Live with it. Squirm. Screech. Feel uncomfortable. Lay awake at night thinking about it. It's good for ya. And, you deserve it.
17
posted on
09/23/2003 4:05:21 AM PDT
by
FlyVet
To: jaykay
Thanks.
Smilin' back at ya, kid...
To: sarcasm
"not of a topless supermodel or two female pop singers kissing or Prince William in a grass skirt"
Don't bring Prince William into this. The media is censoring since 2001 that he refused to ever be King !
19
posted on
09/23/2003 4:15:38 AM PDT
by
Truth666
To: backhoe
Thanks, backhoe!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson