The former is a bit of a manupulation in that he has always -- for years and years -- supported what he calls "Indian soverignty" and taken their contributions. It is one of the reasons I am not a McClintock supporter (but see as as the best candidate in, to put mildy, an imperfect field).
It's not like he sold out his principles in this election -- he always had those principle -- again something I disagree with. I do not like the emergen of all these casinos.
The latter, yes. That was a bigger mistake.
As far as casinos. I think Schwarzenegger is more likley to invite Vegas concerns in to build casinos. That's worse than "Indian gaming" to my mind.
There you go again -- saying what Arnold is more likely to do when you have absolutely "zero" credibility about Arnold and that issue has never been discussed but you state it anyway! Actually IMO the Indian gambling is just as bad -- if you think the Indians are controlling it without organized crime think again -- organized crime would not permit that to happen. You can bet if they were not getting a piece of the action, there would be strikes of workers, etc. Don't be so naive! Arnold is right -- you don't take contributions from someone who you will be negotiating with as Governor. Shame McC doens't see it the same way!