Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tallhappy
As far as casinos. I think Schwarzenegger is more likley to invite Vegas concerns in to build casinos. That's worse than "Indian gaming" to my mind.

There you go again -- saying what Arnold is more likely to do when you have absolutely "zero" credibility about Arnold and that issue has never been discussed but you state it anyway! Actually IMO the Indian gambling is just as bad -- if you think the Indians are controlling it without organized crime think again -- organized crime would not permit that to happen. You can bet if they were not getting a piece of the action, there would be strikes of workers, etc. Don't be so naive! Arnold is right -- you don't take contributions from someone who you will be negotiating with as Governor. Shame McC doens't see it the same way!

153 posted on 09/22/2003 9:49:58 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (Alpha Omnicron Pi Mom too! -- Visit http://www.georgewbush.com!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: PhiKapMom
hat issue has never been discussed but you state it anyway!

Hugh Hewitt discussed it at length as a sort of "gambling card" Schwarzenegger could play.

157 posted on 09/22/2003 9:53:48 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson