Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Moslems Serve?
www.adamyoshida.com ^ | September 21, 2003 | Adam Yoshida

Posted on 09/21/2003 7:12:43 PM PDT by adamyoshida

Can Moslems Serve?

Sergeant Assan Akhbar. Sergeant John Allen Muhammad. Sergeant Ali Mohamed. Captain James Yee. What do all of these men have in common? They all served in the US Army, they are all Moslems, and they are all traitors. Akhbar killed several of his fellow soldiers in a grenade attack during the Iraq War. Muhammad was an unreliable solider who, after leaving the Army, killed ten people in a series of sniper attacks. Mohamed set up the terrorist cell which eventually bombed the US Embassy in Nairobi. The latest man on the list, Captain Yee, is a Chinese-American who converted to Islam in the mid 1990’s. Eventually he became an Islamic Chaplin and was regularly hailed in the media as an effective illustration of a loyal practitioner of the religion of peace. Oh yes, and was a terrorist too- that part is a little hard to forget. Given all of this, the question must be asked: can Moslems continue to be allowed to serve in the American Armed Forces, or does their presence constitute a security risk?

There will be those who will accuse me of racism for even raising such a question. How dare I question the loyalty of Islamic soldiers serving on the front lines? But events now leave us with no choice. Moreover, it is clear that al-Qaeda is deliberately infiltrating the US Army- Yee suddenly rejoined the Army after living in Syria for four years, Mohamed came to the US Army by way of the Egyptian one. A good first step would be to forbid the service in the US military of anyone who has lived in an Islamic country for an extended period of time and was not on government business of some sort. This might sound unfair to some- but allowing someone to join the US Army after a half-decade sojourn in Araby is like allowing someone just back from a six-year stint as a Factory Worker in the USSR to join the Marine Corps circa 1953.

Whether we like it or not the War on Terrorism puts us up against people who claim to be fighting on behalf of the Islamic religion. The Islamist creed is strong, especially among new converts to the religion (which a majority of Moslems in the US Army are) it is hardly unexpected that some will take seriously the calls for Jihad and attack their fellow soldiers. This problem is made much worse when these men are deployed to the Middle East where they are subjected to a constant stream of Islamist propaganda and called upon to fight their fellow Mohammedans.

Some have advocated the immediate discharge of all Moslems in the Armed Forces. I would not, perhaps, go that far. The discharge of those practicing the Islamic faith would unfairly punish actually loyal Americans simply upon the basis of their religion. Rather, a through investigation of the backgrounds of all Islamic soldiers must be undertaken and those whose loyalty might be even considered somewhat suspect must be immediately removed from the service. Many will call such investigations ‘McCarthyism’ and they’re right if, by ‘McCarthyism’ they mean ‘investigations that remove disloyal individuals from the government.’ Still, these investigations will find that only a minority of Moslems have terrorist ties or suspect loyalties- so what shall be done with the rest?

I think that we ought to look to history for a solution to this problem. In the Second World War Japanese-Americans, while forbidden from serving in the regular army, were allowed to join the 442nd Regimental Combat Team, which became one of the most distinguished units of the entire war. Deployed for service in Italy, members of the unit fought with fanatical and suicidal bravery thereby proving that they were as loyal as any other Americans.

This would be an excellent model to follow today. Most estimates suggest that there are somewhere between five and ten thousand Moslems in the US Army, the majority of them black converts. These men could be reassigned to a new ‘Islamic Brigade’, which could then be deployed to some theatre where they would be unlikely to have to fight against their fellow Moslems and where they might be kept away from the influence of radical Islamists. The men could be carefully monitored, with those showing radical tendencies being speedily discharged. They could be placed under the spiritual guidance of extremely carefully vetted moderate Islamic clerics and guided towards a peaceful and ‘Americanized’ form of Islam.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: akhbar; alimohamed; antiamerican; asanakbar; dcsnipers; espionage; fifthcolumn; fifthcolumnists; islam; jamesyee; johnallenmuhammad; muslims; pc; politicallycorrect; saboteurs; sedition; spy; theenemywithin; traitors; treason; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

1 posted on 09/21/2003 7:12:43 PM PDT by adamyoshida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: adamyoshida
Can Moslems Serve?

Yes, but they're prone to foot-faulting. And don't even get me started on their volleying abilities.

2 posted on 09/21/2003 7:15:28 PM PDT by TrappedInLiberalHell (Increasingly alone in a world going to Hill(ary) in a handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adamyoshida
Send them to Korea, if it comes to that.
3 posted on 09/21/2003 7:17:26 PM PDT by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shekkian
That was exactly the spot I was thinking of.
4 posted on 09/21/2003 7:19:12 PM PDT by adamyoshida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TrappedInLiberalHell
Can Moslems Serve?


5 posted on 09/21/2003 7:19:19 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: adamyoshida
what % is that 3 cases of thousands upon thousands who have loyally served

0.3 percent?
not real convincing.


6 posted on 09/21/2003 7:19:23 PM PDT by Persia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adamyoshida
If Moslems can't serve because they're really working for Islam, then you might as well say Jews can't serve because they're really working for Israel, and Catholics can't serve because they're really working for the Vatican.
7 posted on 09/21/2003 7:19:52 PM PDT by findingtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adamyoshida

8 posted on 09/21/2003 7:20:51 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adamyoshida
The problem isn't when Muslims serve in the U.S. Army. The problem is when they betray the United States in favor of Islam.

Now, I ask you, how many Muslims in the U.S. have served in the armed forces and NOT committed treason?

9 posted on 09/21/2003 7:23:40 PM PDT by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persia
What percent of the religiously-motivated treason, sabotage and murder within the ranks do the muslim episodes represent?

100 percent.

Absolutely convincing.

10 posted on 09/21/2003 7:23:51 PM PDT by dagnabbit (Don't let 'em abolish America. No Amnesty. No Matriculas. No Merger with Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
Plenty- but every example of treason committed in the US Army in recent years has been by a Moslem, despite the fact that Moslems make up less than 1% of the Army.
11 posted on 09/21/2003 7:25:33 PM PDT by adamyoshida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: findingtruth
If Moslems can't serve because they're really working for Islam, then you might as well say Jews can't serve because they're really working for Israel, and Catholics can't serve because they're really working for the Vatican.

What kind of childish poppycock is this?

12 posted on 09/21/2003 7:33:00 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: adamyoshida
I would caution my son serving in the military against any Muslim fellow servicemen. Prejudice? No doubt, but based on recent history there is every reason for it. The only way to stop the prejudice against American Muslims is for THEM to put America first - and get rid of the fanatical Wahabbi influence. It's really up to American Muslims.
13 posted on 09/21/2003 7:36:32 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adamyoshida
(Can Moslems Serve?)

Only as gator bait!
14 posted on 09/21/2003 7:39:55 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (PLANES: Remember Takeoffs are optional, Landings are mandatory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
The followers of Islam, ie: Muslims, are wholly dedicated to convert the peoples of our world to their religion.

Make no mistake about it. Violence is an approved method.

The swords on the flag of Saudi Arabia are not there just to fill up space.

Islam has nothing to do with peace.

Muslims in the US Forces are a fifth column of spies.
15 posted on 09/21/2003 7:41:47 PM PDT by TaMoDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xJones
When Islam renounces the Koran's teachings regarding Jews and infidels (us), I'll feel comfortable whith Muslims serving in the armed forces. Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all are taught we are the infidel.
16 posted on 09/21/2003 7:44:13 PM PDT by umgud (gov't has more money than it needs, but never as much as it wants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
Well first, I'm struggling to remember the name of that Jewish soldier who fragged his officers or that Catholic guy who left the service to take up sniping in DC. Secondly, I'm fuzzy on the details about the war against America being carried out by ultra-orthodox Jews or tradionalist Catholics. Did they knock down landmark buildings or something?
17 posted on 09/21/2003 7:44:32 PM PDT by dagnabbit (Don't let 'em abolish America. No Amnesty. No Matriculas. No Merger with Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TrappedInLiberalHell
Yes, but they're prone to foot-faulting. And don't even get me started on their volleying abilities.

LOL, but they always aim for the net, when they're not trying to slide under it and complaining that it's all the refs fault because he/she is prejudiced against them. And the ref is probably Jewish; we all know how many Jewish volleyball refs there are.

18 posted on 09/21/2003 7:45:11 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: findingtruth; CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
If Moslems can't serve because they're really working for Islam, then you might as well say Jews can't serve because they're really working for Israel, and Catholics can't serve because they're really working for the Vatican.

Dude---Catholics and Jews are not at war with whites, Catholics, Jews and protestants and have not sworn allegiance to a creed to kill them, nor flown airplanes into buildings containing them.

19 posted on 09/21/2003 7:48:28 PM PDT by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
See Post # 15.
20 posted on 09/21/2003 7:49:59 PM PDT by TaMoDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson