Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A VERY interesting compilation of facts surrounding Saddam Hussein's support of terrorists and AQ specifically.
1 posted on 09/19/2003 7:02:01 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Peach; nutmeg; Yehuda; Dutchy; tet68; Shermy
bump
2 posted on 09/19/2003 7:07:55 AM PDT by RaceBannon (It is perfectly fine to kill people when you are defending yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Peach; MJY1288; Calpernia; Grampa Dave; anniegetyourgun; Coop; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BOBTHENAILER; ..
Thanks for the post, Peach. Nice summary. Enemy of my enemy is my friend: Saddam and Al Qaeda, Saddam and the press, Saddam and Democrats, Saddam and Hollywood, Saddam and UN-France-EU vs. America.

 Thanks, Tonkin!

If you want on or off my PRO-coalition ping list, please Freepmail me. Warning: it is a high volume ping list on good days. (Most days are good days).

5 posted on 09/19/2003 7:18:23 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl ("Don't they care about the Iraqi people..at all?"~Sama in Iraq re. those pushing US to leave, 9/17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
If Atta was under such a high degree of scrutiny, one wonders why the FBI did not know more about him or what he was up to.

Very good point in an excellent synopsis.

6 posted on 09/19/2003 7:21:40 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
Great article, thanks for posting.
12 posted on 09/19/2003 7:33:44 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
Local idiot "conservative" talk show host has been ranting all week about how the Bush admin misled us. "If you didn't say Saddam was responsible for 9/11, why do most Americans believe he was?" etc.

Oh, gee, I dunno - maybe because "most Americans" applied common sense, as in Saddam did support terrorists in the Philippines and paid blood money to Pali homicide bombers but then we were supposed to believe that he wouldn't dream of supporting AQ? If this local afternoon drive time guy had any competition, he would be toast.
14 posted on 09/19/2003 7:34:55 AM PDT by Let's Roll (And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
The RATmedia has to work especially hard to avoid all these FACTS in order to continue in its pretense that Bush is just an opportunistic warmonger out to wreck havoc throughout the peace loving world. My hatred for it knows no bounds and is only equalled by my contempt for all of its factotums.
21 posted on 09/19/2003 8:01:09 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree. Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
"The conventional wisdom has been that this could not have been the case because bin Laden, an Islamic fanatic reactionary, and Saddam, a secular Baathist modernizer, could never align or cooperate. " The "Conventional idiocy" is more like it. Hitler and Stalin carved up Poland together, then the Capitalist Americans went to war on the side of the Soviet Communists. Saddam regularly and loudly supported the mosque-based Hamas Death Cult, subsidizing with cash the families that bound their little sweethearts to the pagan altar of Moloch.
27 posted on 09/19/2003 8:50:49 AM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
According to Editor & Publisher, the story got little play,

Absolutely B.S. It got endless play. Remember "Bush's shifting reasons" critique?

29 posted on 09/19/2003 10:15:28 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
bump
30 posted on 09/19/2003 10:38:54 AM PDT by lowbridge ("France is a dog-hole, and it no more merits the tread of a man's foot."- Shakespeare (All's Well..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Peach

A lot of important info here - but it's now nearly TWO years since this article appeared and FOUR years since 9/11.... WHY is the Bush administration saying virtually nothing about anything??? Do they simply lack any more definite evidence, or is there something else in play here? I know Bush does not care about polls, but the severe erosion of support for the Iraq war is truly hurting national security -- not only does it make it more difficult to succeed in our current endeavor, but it makes it nearly impossible to consider doing what we need to do next: confront Iran and Syria with imminent catastrophe if they do not straighten up and stop sponsoring terrorism against our troops!


34 posted on 08/24/2005 6:53:12 PM PDT by Enchante (Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson