Skip to comments.
Meet Tom McClintock Thursday Evening in Culver City, CA. at "ATF Night"
John W. Brantuk, Sr.; Republican Nominee for CA Assembly, District 56 ^
| September 17, 2003
| John W. Brantuk, Sr. - Candidate for CA Assembly
Posted on 09/17/2003 6:06:05 PM PDT by Mr.B.goes.to.Washington
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 321-324 next last
To: gc4nra
Like I said, Arnie won't bother with the "peasants".
261
posted on
09/18/2003 11:00:27 AM PDT
by
Bella_Bru
(For all your tagline needs. Don't delay! Orders shipped overnight.)
To: Tamsey
Additionally, California is hurting Bush and the entire countrySo, we should not look out for the interests of our state, only Bush's? I love our President, but I have a feeling that if he demanded the 1st born of everyone in this country be slaughtered, some idiot here would be saying, "But, it's our guy, so it's ok".
262
posted on
09/18/2003 11:05:09 AM PDT
by
Bella_Bru
(For all your tagline needs. Don't delay! Orders shipped overnight.)
To: Mr.B.goes.to.Washington; Hillary's Lovely Legs
"This is sure to be a Standing Room Only event! "
===
Well, with all due respect, that isn't going to take much, considering that the banquet room only holds 70 people.
I just called San Gennaro Cafe.
(310) 836-0400
To: FairOpinion
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!
A 70 person capacity? Uncanny. Makes me think McTicktock wants it to "appear" he has a crowd overflow numbering in the hundreds.
264
posted on
09/18/2003 11:46:34 AM PDT
by
onyx
To: Tamsey
"Outlawing guns is not the right method of eliminating the problem. If you outlaw guns, people will still have them illegally. In Europe, they're outlawed everywhere. They have very strict gun control in Italy. Yet the Pope was shot. They have very strict gun control in Germany. Yet you see pimps shooting one another." They all say nowadays that they don't want to outlaw guns, but actions usually go otherwise. When the dems in the state assembaly or state senate send him Jack Scott and Don Perata's latest suprise, would Arnold veto it? Does he have the spine to do that? From all the answers I've seen from him on this issue with 'loading indicators', and the outspoken anti-gun advisors he has like Rob Lowe and Dick Riordan(who wants an outright ban).
California's law is already stricter than the Brady Bill and there is no loophole in California's gun show sales anymore.
There's no gun show loophole to begin with. That's a media myth created by VPC.
If you honestly believe that McClintock has a chance despite ALL the polls, then go for it.
I have little faith in polls. After seeing the polls and election results the last 10 years. I really do think he has a shot. Polls can't measure turnout. Caller ID also affect polling since a lot of people screen their calls. I've also seen internal polls off by 20+% at times, and that's not even the ones released to the media.
So I do think McClintock has a chance. And if there is a candidate I agree with 1% of the time(Cruz), 30% of the time(Arnold), and 85% of the time(McClintock), and they aren't third party, then I will certainly back the one I agree with 85% of the time over someone I disagree with much more than I agree with.
265
posted on
09/18/2003 12:03:38 PM PDT
by
Dan from Michigan
(There are two things in the middle of the road. Roadkill, and a yellow stripe.)
To: Mr.B.goes.to.Washington
Post 263 makes it look like Arnold's gun grabber groupies are in their stalking mode, so look out for disrupters at the dinner. Good luck on your event!
266
posted on
09/18/2003 12:04:46 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: FairOpinion
Poor Tom, the man who writes his favorite book is the economic advisor and strong supporter of Arnold.
I am so glad that Arnold is running against Bustamante. It gives one such hope to figure out this fiscal mess.
267
posted on
09/18/2003 12:06:19 PM PDT
by
Hillary's Lovely Legs
(There is no shame in being poor, just dressing poorly.)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
I am so glad that Arnold is running against Bustamante. Yep, Bustamante is for more gun control, banning "assault weapons", trigger locks, the Brady Bill, and closing the "gun show loophole".
By contrast, Arnie is for more gun control, banning "assault weapons", trigger locks, the Brady Bill, and closing the "gun show loophole".
268
posted on
09/18/2003 12:14:11 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: BibChr
Wonderful post. You've nailed the entire recall election with a single pic...
Cheers (and waving goodbye to California)!
- John
To: Roscoe
You live close by, Roscoe, why don't you say you'll go. I'm sure that would increase the turnout.
270
posted on
09/18/2003 12:25:41 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: Fishrrman
Gun controls should be stiffer.Arnold Schwarzenegger
271
posted on
09/18/2003 12:27:22 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: 68 grunt
When asked by Sean Hannity if he supports "the Brady Bill or the 'assault weapons' ban or both," Schwarzennegger replied "Yes, I do [unintelligible] support that, and also I would like to close the loophole of the gun shows." He repeated that stance on "The Larry Elder Show," and added that he would also like to see laws for trigger locks.
http://www.keepandbeararms.com/information/Item.asp?ID=3606
272
posted on
09/18/2003 12:32:19 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Mr.B.goes.to.Washington; HangFire; gc4nra; Tony in Hawaii; Bella_Bru
We will stop by after RFR at Anna's!
273
posted on
09/18/2003 12:33:46 PM PDT
by
diotima
(So it's sorta social, demented and sad, but social.)
To: Fishrrman; Registered
<< Wonderful post. You've nailed the entire recall election with a single pic... >>
Thanks, but ALL the credit goes to Registered. He conceived and made it, among many wonderful others.
I just do a little HTML
(c;
Dan
274
posted on
09/18/2003 12:41:45 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Roscoe
To take a position anything but that would have been suicide in California. You can be 'for' something, yet change it to your vision. Had he made the severe, or intolerant, remarks that you'd like would ensure further democratic (and neo-puritan) demagogic demeaning of of an honorable man.
275
posted on
09/18/2003 12:41:52 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: Roscoe
Well, Roscoe, I've treated you too seriously. My mistake.
276
posted on
09/18/2003 12:44:12 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: 68 grunt
Gun control advocates love Arnold.
277
posted on
09/18/2003 12:46:11 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: 68 grunt
Schwarzennegger replied "Yes, I do [unintelligible] support that, and also I would like to close the loophole of the gun shows."
I realize that quoting him upsets his followers, but would you mind explaining what the "loophole of the gun shows" is?
If you can't, I'll understand.
278
posted on
09/18/2003 12:50:01 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
Yeah, I know, thats why the democrats are so determined in their support. That's why they spend so much time attacking, Tommy boy. Oh, they don't attack Tommy boy, nevermind.
279
posted on
09/18/2003 12:50:46 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: Roscoe
I can't because he mis-spoke. You've heard that a bazillion times, now you tell me how inept he is, yada, yada, yada.
280
posted on
09/18/2003 12:51:54 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 321-324 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson