Nuclear Fatwa Re-Issued on the Internet

www.stevequayle.com ^ | September 16, 2003 | Abu Shihab El-Kandahari

[Mossad1967]

Atomic Jihad Reportedly has Been Declared: "Nuclear Warfare is the Solution for Destroying America"

The coming days will prove that Kaedat el-Jihad [the Al-Qaeda organization] is capable of turning America into a sea of deadly radiation, and this will prove to the world that the end is at hand.... Yes, we will destroy America and its allies, because they have used their power for evil against the weak...

[Mr. Mojo]

Really, does anyone want to speculate what one Ohio Class boat could unleash on Araby?

I was speculating upon that very thing earlier in the week when I watched one of those Boomers cruise past my house (in the Puget Sound). 20 ballistic missiles, 8 nuclear warheads per missile. 160 nuclear bombs, one sub. Enough to take care of bidness, for sure.

[Quix]

I would encourage less smugness about this issue.

I figure the puppet masters have so enabled these idiots but keeps them on SOMEWHAT of a short leash about when to use such capabilities--and that the time is not quite yet.

[astounded]

While I too have that fear in the back of my mind, I also exercise a bit of ostrich behavior trying not to contemplate it. All of the bluster herein about Ohio class boats, the use of thermonuclear weapons against Medina and Mecca, and other Muslim sites, is just that - bluster. My greatest fear is that, if the muslims manage to detonate a fission weapon in NYC, our government will not retaliate in kind by destroying the heart of the "Great Religion". That failure, IMHO, will lead to subsequent detonations on American soil. I don't believe the US leadership would have the courage to do what is necessary to end this thing. That is my greatest fear, not a detonation.

[Quix]

I think you are--extremely sadly--quite, quite, RIGHT.

We must have more courage to respond emphatically or the dogpile will just get higher until what is left of us seeks God and rises up to finally respond appropriately, IMHO.

[cmsgop]

Bump

[Quix]

THANKS, WILL CHECK IT OUT.

[Quix]

IMHO,

People who scoff at the above have simply not done their homework; are not well read; do not understand the psyche, psychology, sociology of the radical enemy . . . nor, for that matter, do not understand the demonic forces involved.

There are maybe 6-12 or 8-14 hints, clues, blatant indications that such will be coming sooner than later.

Whistling by the graveyard may be understandable.

Eating, drinking and making merry may be understandable for the suicidal.

But none such will help a smidgen after the event, nor to prevent the event.

If I read the prophetic messages the last 6 months at all correctly--and I'm just talking about the minority which have resonated with my spirit--then God is all set to allow such on our soil for a variety of reasons--some including Israel; some including our gross persistence in 'giving Him the finger' with the behaviors of 30-40%+ of our citizena--not to mention horrors amongst even our better churches and spiritual leaders--and then and pretending that all of that won't matter to God at all--and that we can go our merry rebellious ways.

WRONG!

The interesting thing will be how many will get the message afterwards--even how many Believers will get the message.

It will also be interesting how decisive a response President Bush manages--prayerfully he will escape such damage.

Which reminds me, I have one more loved one in LA to caution.

[Merdoug]

I must respectfully disagree with you. If an American city got nuked, the bleeding heart, traitorious liberals in this country would scream bloody murder against any sort of nuke counterstrike and Bush would cave to them with political correctness.

[Quix]

I don't know the probability of what you suggest.

But I wager it's well above 0.00%, sadly.

I do think Bush might suprise us all on that score, though. All the more so if Believers pray for him persistently, earnestly, daily.

[Quix]

YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, imho.

And about Sun Tzu as well.

[Quix]

As horrendous as it would be--absolutely horrendous.

I DO HOPE you are more correct than wrong. I hope you are MUCH MORE correct than wrong.

I still think 10-20% of our populace would be mindlessly apologizing for our provoking such an attack. IDIOTS!

[Quix]

I do

NOT

think Shrillery Machiavelli de Sade would see them as her enemies.

I believe she would see them as merely useful idiots to help her bring about the world government which she wants to be a top level star in.

She would use the fear to coerce every aspect of our nation and government--indeed, the world--toward that end.

[Quix]

IF, IF, IF,

IF, IF, IF, IF,

IF, IF, IF, IF, IF,

the WILL

to use such exists at appropriate times to appropriate degrees.

And,

IF, IF, IF,

The Soviets newer ultra fast torpedos and ultra silent subs are not successful in doing our Boats in pre-emptively.

[Fledermaus]

You are correct, sir! A dirty bomb would be very limited in range and it's effects are easily eliminated with proper preparation and taking a shower.

Pretty much the same with chemical weapons that do less damage if dispersed over a wide area. It has to be concentrated.

Biological weapons are a little more hazardous, but also easily avoided once unleashed and a fast quarantine of the effected and inoculations of others would limit it's damage.

I'm more worried about some large asteroid hitting the planet or Russia getting ticked and launching sub-based nukes in the large megaton level. Or China.

[Fledermaus]

The most troubling thing about what you say is...you may very well be right...I don't vision her, for a minute, to hesitate using nuclear weapons against her enemy.

Oh no...Hillary is going to nuke the South?

[Fledermaus]

I think he meant the "panic" from Three Mile Island to the use of nuclear energy. To this day we don't have enough nuclear plants because the idiots who fear something they have no clue about and "panic" when it comes up.

[Quix]

Is there any particular 24 hour period during the Moslem 'holy' period

when such an attack would be

MOST likely?

. . . from a religious standpoint?

[Quix]

Dear Poohbah,

Am curious about your opinions on all this.

I suspect you'd be most dismissive.

But, as we know, I've been wrong before.

[Poohbah]

Talk is cheap, unless you're hiring a lawyer.

[Quix]

Well said.

How applicable to this should be evident 30-40 days hence.