1 posted on
09/15/2003 1:50:36 AM PDT by
ambrose
To: goldstategop; Bonaparte; kellynla; Rabid Republican; heleny; Bob; EternalVigilance; Reagan Man; ...
And those so-called Republicans who would drive a principled conservative like Tom McClintock from the race should hang their heads in shame. If they cannot fight for this candidate, they may as well abandon the battle altogether, for they are useless soldiers. It is better to spend 40 years in the political wilderness than to forsake one's soul for all the kingdoms of the world, much less four years in Sacramento. Still worse, however, are the right-side commentators who urge conservatives to abandon their principles and line up behind this false Republican god. To sacrifice your own soul to the naked pursuit of power is bad enough, to tempt others to do likewise is not just the ultimate in negative campaigning, it is pure political Satanism.
2 posted on
09/15/2003 1:55:18 AM PDT by
ambrose
(Member of the McClintock Militia)
To: ambrose
This is BillyBoy's excellent post on another thread. It kind of says it all about the consequences of giving up values to get anything electable as a "Republican"
To: Brian Allen
NOTICE TO ALL "principled-republican" and other DNC-inspired McJimJeffords SUPPORTERS
ROTFLMAO!!!
What PLANET are you Arinold supporters living on where McClintock votes sound ANYTHING like Perot supporters or Jeffords supporters? I guess you sat in a closet during those elections.
Let me refresh your memory. Here are ACTUAL QUOTES from Jeffords apologists on FR before he switched parties. See if you can read it-- very slowly-- and TRY to figure out what kind of people are arguing the SAME points in California today:
"Liberal states elect liberal Republicans and Vermont is our most liberal state. Is this some kind of news flash? Jeffords is so loved in his home state. GW's best chance is to bring over Democrats from states he carried by a wide margin. That's what he's doing. If you don't know why we bothered to win the White House, you're too dumb to post". Posted on 04/04/2001 12:47:34 PDT
"Jeffords is interested in being Gov. of VT. He'd get support of both Republicans and Democrats and would be hard to beat. But he'll probably remain Senator. Leahy would need to step down before Dean could run, and that's likely. But what about the Bernie factor? He'd give Dean a good run for his money, and VT could end up having an Independent Socialist Senator and a moderate Republican Senator." Posted on 02/14/2001 18:39:38 PST
"Jeffords may be a leading RINO, but he's the only one who can win on the Republican ticket. Thank goodness Sanders didn't run!" Posted on 05/25/2000 14:24:50 PDT
"As a Republican of some 35 years, I have personally never seen this party in such sad shape. We cannot be winners with the hateful right. The Liberals know this... Jeffords is just expressing the frustration of many Republicans with the Buchanan-right today." Posted on 02/10/2000 17:23:07 PST
"Perhaps Jeffords is a RINO (as his record, I think, indicates), but perhaps he is just doing what I think some "moderates" in the House did: covering his butt for his liberal constituency , but still intending to vote to convict." Posted on 01/18/99 06:43:54 PST
Jeffords "Republican" supporters voted for that socialist because he had an "R" next to his name and "could win" in a liberal state. Supposely his victory would "help Bush" too and his far-left stance on social issues "didn't matter". Think about this slowly and try to answer honestly for once. Now tell me. Who is esposing that viewpoint NOW??
29 posted on 09/14/2003 1:18 AM EDT by BillyBoy (George Ryan deserves a long term....without parole.)
7 posted on
09/15/2003 2:08:26 AM PDT by
grania
("Won't get fooled again")
To: ambrose
So the nazi stuff didn't stick?
Now you are going to try the "satan worshippers" angle?
To: ambrose
Oh good heavens.... I haven't had such a fit of the giggles in ages!
11 posted on
09/15/2003 2:25:17 AM PDT by
Tamzee
("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
To: ambrose
What a nutty article.
22 posted on
09/15/2003 3:18:02 AM PDT by
Tempest
(Anyone who accepts the LA Times as the truth has no business calling anyone a RINO)
To: ambrose
Satanic Schwarzeneggerians
25 posted on
09/15/2003 3:25:47 AM PDT by
ambrose
(Member of the McClintock Militia)
To: ambrose
The Republican Party is becoming more moderate and more inclusive... This is the 21st century, not the 12th.
27 posted on
09/15/2003 3:27:22 AM PDT by
tkathy
To: Poohbah; strela; CheneyChick; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; general_re; sinkspur
Sprites of earth and air --
Fiends of flame and fire --
Demon souls,
Come here in shoals,
This dreaded deed inspire!
Appear, appear, appear.
44 posted on
09/15/2003 6:43:00 AM PDT by
dighton
(NLC™)
To: ambrose
How eminently fitting that a son of a National Socialist would fail to see the dangers in compiling such data! After all, without it, how can the state be expected to find those pesky Jews and Japanese in case it serves the interests of the children to round them up again? Absolutely disgraceful comments. This guy is a piece of sh*t.
To: ambrose
How eminently fitting that a son of a National Socialist would fail to see the dangers in compiling such data! After all, without it, how can the state be expected to find those pesky Jews and Japanese in case it serves the interests of the children to round them up again? Absolutely disgraceful comments. This guy is a piece of sh*t.
To: ambrose
My advice is don't be coward and vote McClintock. Vote directly for Bustamante because that's who you will get.
And if you don't think it can get any worse under the Mexifornian Bustamante you are dead wrong
60 posted on
09/15/2003 7:29:21 AM PDT by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
To: ambrose
Vox Day is a novelist and Christian libertarian. He is a member of the SFWA, Mensa and the Southern Baptist Convention
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Good one.
65 posted on
09/15/2003 7:31:52 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: ambrose
Schwarzenegger, far from representing the salvation of California's Republican Party, stands for its complete immolation.
67 posted on
09/15/2003 7:36:20 AM PDT by
Walkin Man
(***Supporters of Prop 54 are right-wing crazies!*** Quote from Arnold Schwarzenegger)
To: All
Just consider the source...
Absentee votes continue to be locked away for Tom McClintock a man that cannot win.
To: ambrose
It is better to spend 40 years in the political wilderness than to forsake one's soul for all the kingdoms of the world, much less four years in Sacramento. Not many of the Tommy fans are willing to admit that they would rather see Cruz elected if they can not have Tommy. While I do not agree with this position, I do admire courage of the few like this Vox Day who are willing say what they really mean.
The new McClintock campaign slogan should be:
Give me Tommy or give me liberal tyranny.
110 posted on
09/15/2003 9:18:23 AM PDT by
Jeff Gordon
(Anyone who accepts the LA Times as the truth has no business calling anyone a RINO.)
To: ambrose
Satanic Schwarzeneggerians Shouldn't that read 'Satanic Schwarzenigerians'?
111 posted on
09/15/2003 9:22:29 AM PDT by
Revolting cat!
(Boss, I forgot to bring my tag line!)
To: ambrose
Would President Gore have been worse? Perhaps
There's so much wrong and offensive about this article, but I suppose the cited remark above takes the cake. Anybody writing such a thing is most certainly building a false argument.
Satanism, Naziism, rounding up Jews and Japanese. This garbage you've posted is quite offensive really.
Once again McClintock supporters show their ugly, intolerant side. Have you considered that this undercurrent of hate and intolerance might be why Tom and his mini-minions are so very unpopular? Thought not.
To: ambrose
Join Us
Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!
Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin
To: ambrose
!ymmoT, atsiv al atsaH
139 posted on
09/15/2003 1:36:48 PM PDT by
RichInOC
(?tey 7 rebotcO ti sI)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson