Skip to comments.
The bogus bill (Schwarzenegger on Workers Compensation)
California Insider (Sacramento Bee Weblog - Weintraub) ^
| September 13, 2003
| Dan Weintraub
Posted on 09/13/2003 3:37:04 PM PDT by calcowgirl
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:57:23 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
After his San Diego
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: recall; schwarzenegger; workerscompensation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: calcowgirl
I do believe his staff is failing him on issues like this, but in Schwarzenegger's defense (oh quit groaning), he has had about a month to develop policy and press the flesh. People probably think he should have done more, but by now I'm surprised his head isn't suffering shell shock.
This article has merit. I do think the 5am until midnight schedule these guys get on makes it difficult to accomplish everything we desire. I do think Schwarzenegger should be sharper on certain issues by now.
To: calcowgirl
Arnold doesn't have a clue. If Mr. Weintraub had asked
the same questions of McClintock, McClintock would have
given him "chapter and verse".
To: calcowgirl
... Schwarzenegger is not a policy wonk ...Excellent, thanks.
VOTE SCHWARZENEGGER - NOT A WONK
4
posted on
09/13/2003 3:47:10 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: upcountryhorseman
Okay, but ..
Vote McClintonock - vote wonk
5
posted on
09/13/2003 3:48:58 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: upcountryhorseman
Yep...
But the keep telling us "he can't win"...
He could win if they would just give him a chance.
6
posted on
09/13/2003 3:51:17 PM PDT
by
DB
(©)
To: calcowgirl
Arnold has had far more than a month to think about these issues. He's lived in this state since 1968, and has been seriously considering a run for governor since at least early 2001.
7
posted on
09/13/2003 3:51:28 PM PDT
by
ambrose
(Member of the McClintock Militia)
To: 68 grunt
Yes, cool man, maybe you, me and Arnold can smoke hash together and listen to some New Age music.
VOTE MCCLINTOCK -- He knows what he's going to do, unlike poor Arnold
8
posted on
09/13/2003 3:54:18 PM PDT
by
sruleoflaw
((FOR TOM MCCLINTOCK: Arnold will get my vote when hell freezes over and pigs fly))
To: calcowgirl
What is amazing is McClintock is the kind of candidate everybody claims they want to elect. Won't break promises, isn't slick and smooth, doesn't compromise his principles for a special interest buck, etc. So then the dream candidate is here, the one everybody claims they want, and people say "he can't win." Sad, sad, sad, letting the elite media keep brainwashing you into voting for a compelete slickster, the prototype politician you claim you can't stand, and you foam at the mouth for him.
9
posted on
09/13/2003 4:05:53 PM PDT
by
Russell Scott
(Without massive intervention from Heaven, America doesn't have a prayer.)
To: 68 grunt
What exactly are you trying to achieve by calling him "McClintonock"?
10
posted on
09/13/2003 4:27:35 PM PDT
by
Paul_B
To: Russell Scott
BUMP
11
posted on
09/13/2003 4:31:30 PM PDT
by
GrandMoM
("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
To: calcowgirl
It's hard to understand how folks could so solidly cast their support behind someone who's revealed so little about his views. All I've heard is that folks think his business success will translate into good governance; of course, one could make the same claim regarding Corzine.
12
posted on
09/13/2003 4:37:45 PM PDT
by
NittanyLion
(Go Tom Go!)
To: Paul_B
Excuse me. I could lie and say a typo, but the truth is it was a juevenile quip.
13
posted on
09/13/2003 4:42:03 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: sruleoflaw
VOTE MCCLINTOCK -- He knows what he's going to do, unlike poor Arnold ...VOTE SCHWARZENEGGER - VOTE PROUDLY
14
posted on
09/13/2003 4:46:24 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: calcowgirl
Because they saw the last five years where we were going. They saw the increases in workers compensation. If they would have been out there and listened to what the people are saying, what the businesses are saying, they would have started working on it already two years ago. ....WELL, geez, Arnold you have been planning this chance of govenorship for two years, weren't YOU listening to the people????
....shouldn't you have had a procurable plan ?
....Arnold, this aimless drivel of yours is really getting old!
15
posted on
09/13/2003 4:54:02 PM PDT
by
GrandMoM
("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
To: GrandMoM
Now now..all drivel aside, He means well, LOL.
He has had his eye on the Gub'ship for years. The fact that he just waltzes in and will now possibly take it on celebrity or policies alone rather than earn it is disconcerting, especially when you consider it may be just his first step to the White house as Orrin Hatch is pushing legislation to let naturalized citizens be able to run for President.
If he and Jeb Bush were in contention for the Repub nomination in 2008, who would win?
That assumes that he does a reasonably decent job in California. Ya never know these days. (sarcasm or is it?) :-o
16
posted on
09/13/2003 5:12:03 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi .. "Logic ", of late, flies in the face on conventions AND principles in California.)
To: 68 grunt
wonk backwards spells know
sorry, it's hot here and my blood to beer ratio is low. But Im working on it. ;-).
17
posted on
09/13/2003 5:14:03 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi .. "Logic ", of late, flies in the face of conventions AND principles in California.)
To: DoughtyOne
An Update from Dan Weintraub... same link as original
McClintock on workers comp
I asked Tom McClintock this afternoon the same question I asked Arnold last night: what are you proposing as a reform of workers compensation that the Legislature did not pass this week? I asked McClintock to tell me the single most important proposal in his package that was left out of the legislative reform.
Here was his answer:
Require clinical verification of physical injuries before we compensate them. Require by some objective medical standard that the injury actually exists. Aches and pains and worries are a part of life and we will bankrupt our economy if we continue to pay people who have them.
Posted by dweintraub at 06:05 PM
18
posted on
09/13/2003 7:41:09 PM PDT
by
calcowgirl
(Right Wing Crazy #4052977)
To: calcowgirl
Here was his (McClintock's) answer: Require clinical verification of physical injuries before we compensate them. Require by some objective medical standard that the injury actually exists. Aches and pains and worries are a part of life and we will bankrupt our economy if we continue to pay people who have them.
To many big words and syllables for the R-nulled supporters
The answer to all questions is (grunt) "R-nulled win"
19
posted on
09/13/2003 9:53:01 PM PDT
by
tophat9000
(Welcome one and all to........The Great Toad Boil !!! .......................Sponsor by R-nulled)
To: tophat9000
I can see it now...
Arnold: "That's what I said. The reporter must have misunderstood me."
UGGGHHHH!
20
posted on
09/13/2003 10:11:40 PM PDT
by
calcowgirl
(Right Wing Crazy #4052977)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson