Red Roots Of Gay Movement

Accuracy In Media ^ | September 10, 2003 | Cliff Kincaid

[Vindiciae Contra TyrannoSCOTUS]

It's often said that homosexuals have always been with us, as if the "gay rights" movement has just spontaneously emerged, but the truth is that it has been traced to one man, a communist named Harry Hay. This is a story that deserves to be told as society proceeds with a debate over the extent of "gay rights."

This is what lies behind the drive for homosexual marriage. Their "rights" won't end with that. They want to legalize child molestation by calling it "love." With the gay marriage debate underway, it's time for the major media to tell the full truth about the origins and founder of this "movement."

[tdadams]

Shoulda known someone would post that AGAIN. Do you think this list of 'communist goals' was some Marxist memo uncovered in the waning days of the Soviet Union? I hope you realize it's taken from a polemic. It would be the same as if the American Atheist Association was to write a list of 'Religious Right goals'. No one would ascribe one ounce of credibility to it. Don't be so naive.

[First Amendment]

Do articles from this site have to be excerpted? (My dial-up is so slow I hate having to be directed to other sites, I'm lazy!)

[upchuck]

Thank you for posting an unnecessarily excerpted article.

[3catsanadog]

When it comes to actual numbers, heterosexuals commit more serial rapes and murders; however, when it comes to percentages of their population, homosexual serial rape, molestation and murder is greater.

[3catsanadog]

Thank you, thank you for posting this. I saw this some time ago and lost the link for it. I shall now bookmark this thread.

[3catsanadog]

P.S. Now if I could only find the Gay Agenda of 1972. As God as my witness, there is a statement promoting the age of consent.

[Bonaparte]

"...it's time for the major media to tell the full truth about the origins and founder of this "movement.

Not a chance. They wouldn't identify Betty Friedan, the founder of "feminism," as a communist, much less expose the true extent of her perfidy. They're not going to do that with Hay or with any of their other leftist icons.

[ppaul]

Red Roots?
Oh dear!
That'll never do.

[Bonaparte]

The communist goals were published in The Naked Communist by Cleon Skousen and subsequently read into the Congressional Record in 1963.

[tdadams]

Yes, I know that. And...

[Bonaparte]

You dispute the accuracy of Skousen's facts?

[tdadams]

Tell me something if you can. From what source did Skousen derive this list of communist goals?

[Bonaparte]

You mean you haven't read the book?

[tdadams]

I don't think that's what I said. I asked you to tell me, if you're able, from what sources Skousen derived his list of Communist goals.

[John O]

So which is it? Gays are nazis or gays are communists?

Actually they could be called either. National socialism and communism are very closely aligned movements on the left fringe of thought. Most 'homosexuals' are decidedly leftist in their political agenda. They are socialists (NAZI) and some are far left enough to be communist. Especially the ones intent on wiping out religion and the bible (which convicts them of the sin of their chosen lifestyle)

[John O]

I though I was reading the platform of the DNC.

You were.

[John O]

When it comes to actual numbers, heterosexuals commit more serial rapes and murders; however, when it comes to percentages of their population, homosexual serial rape, molestation and murder is greater.

However, 'homosexuals' are a far higher percentage of serial murderers than heterosexual people. 'Homosexuals' also tend to have far greater numbers of victims per molester than heterosexuals do. (something on the order of 5 to 20 times more victims per molestor)

It is a far greater risk to let your children be exposed to 'homosexuals' than it is to expose them to the general non-homosexual prison population

The first law of homosexuality:

'Homosexuals' do not reproduce, they recruit

The third law of homosexuality:

Any exposure of children to homosexual behavior is child abuse

[Bonaparte]

"I don't think that's what I said."

You attacked the book as a mere "polemic."

I asked you point blank if you disputed Skousen's facts.

You evaded me.

Yes, I don't think you've read the book you just disparaged.

[tdadams]

And you've evaded me. You can't, or won't, answer my question, which proves the point I was trying to make. Thank you very much.

[Bonaparte]

What transparent and brazen mendacity! You made a claim, not I. When challenged to support your claim, you tried to change the subject to a claim I actually never made.

Once again: What is the basis for your claim that Skousen's book is a mere "polemic"?