Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's Red Flag Linux to step onto global stage
InfoWorld ^ | September 04, 2003 | By Sumner Lemon, IDG News Service

Posted on 09/04/2003 2:16:53 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative

China's Red Flag Linux to step onto global stage

Alliance with HP strengthened as prelude to worldwide expansion of development effort

TAIPEI, Taiwan -- An alliance between Hewlett-Packard Co. and Chinese Linux developer Red Flag Software Co. Ltd. established last month should lead to cooperation between the two companies on technology development and marketing of Red Flag Linux to companies in China and around the world.

The announcement, made in Beijing on Aug. 20, strengthens a long-standing relationship between the two companies and represents a milestone in Red Flag's plans to expand its business outside the world's most populous country.

The two companies plan to first focus their cooperative efforts in China, and then expand their work to include Asia-Pacific and the rest of the world, according to a joint statement released last month by the two companies. No timeframe was given for when Red Flag plans to expand its enterprise software business beyond China.

(Excerpt) Read more at infoworld.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: anythingforabuck; china; computers; espionage; linix; linux; operatingsystems; software; stupidity; treason; treson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 last
To: Golden Eagle
You're trying to tell me that booth babes are somehow a representative sample in this discussion? ;)
141 posted on 09/05/2003 4:35:16 PM PDT by Liberal Classic (Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic
As we all know, the sexier the booth babe, the more technically superior the product is. Afterall chicks dig cool technology, right? right? /sarcasm
142 posted on 09/05/2003 4:37:05 PM PDT by CodeMonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Personal experience.

That's what I thought.... you pulled it out of your butt, as you normally do. You have absolutely no proof for your claim.

143 posted on 09/05/2003 4:37:33 PM PDT by TechJunkYard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: CodeMonkey
Why don't you get off your high horse about Linux and get pissed off about Loral freely giving away their commercial rocket technology to the Chinese, or at least making it so easy for the taking that it was criminal.

I am still ticked about that, but it's long over with. This is the problem now, and I see whose side you're leaning to.

If the PLA and Chinese Intel put operatives into those factories over time they can steal a few parts here, a few parts there off the assembly lines and figure out how to build our tech.

OVER TIME is the key part of your comment, yet you lack to even realize the significance even though you spoke it yourself. You'd rather just give it to them right? No need for things such as patents is what you preach.

We shouldn't have even a fair trade agreement with China let alone a free trade agreement.

Do what? You are the one taking HP's side to help build the internal computers systems for the Red Chinese government! You are seriously mixed up, I suggest you take a break and try to reliaze how contradictory your own statements are.

someone who in so many posts has made no bones about how he considers foreigners to be the scum of the Earth when they compete against America.

No, not all foreigners. Just communist governments that have nuclear missles pointed at us.

What you have advocated here is nothing less than the same collectivist mentality that keeps the Chicoms in power.

You'd like to think that, but I have repeatedly said we should be selling them both software and hardware, but we should not be helping them develop their own internal systems that are based on possibly illegal replicas of for-sale US technology (Unix). This is so far beyond your perspective it's not even funny.

144 posted on 09/05/2003 4:41:12 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic
You're trying to tell me that booth babes are somehow a representative sample in this discussion? ;)

Always worth a mention, wouldn't you say. What else keeps us going sometimes? ;)

145 posted on 09/05/2003 4:43:53 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Not sticking around for CodeMonkey's far out response about peace and love.

Gold Eagle Out.
146 posted on 09/05/2003 4:46:43 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: CodeMonkey
Hardly any point to arguing about it. :/
147 posted on 09/05/2003 4:49:23 PM PDT by Liberal Classic (Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
This is the problem now, and I see whose side you're leaning to.

I could care less about what the Chinese do with Linux. If it weren't Linux it would be a BSD. If it were neither they'd simply bootleg Windows XP en masse and make clusters out of XP boxes. One way or another, our software since it's sooooo easy to copy compared to other technology will end up in their hands. You want something to worry about? Worry about a group like Boeing moving a lot of their production over to China. You worry about an OS that might power their weapons rather than the fact that at the rate we're going, most of their weapons themselves will be based on American technology.

No need for things such as patents is what you preach.

That patenting a technology makes its workings open to the public so others can refrain from using the same design, aside.....

I'd rather accept the real world, where we can't easily identify Chinese spies and if we regulate ourselves as heavily as you want, we'll reduce the technology difference by dumbing ourselves down and/or making our companies have to outsource overseas even more to make a buck or two.

You are the one taking HP's side to help build the internal computers systems for the Red Chinese government!

I am saying that if we have a trade relationship with China, which we shouldn't, that what HP is doing is only natural. For all of the aspersions you have thrown my way, you seem to have not even one inkling how Capitalism works. Let me know if you need a little bit of a review of Capitalism 101....

Just communist governments that have nuclear missles pointed at us.

Or Finnland a country which is neither hostile toward us nor has nuclear weapons. Their crime being that they produced Linus Torvalds....

You'd like to think that, but I have repeatedly said we should be selling them both software and hardware, but we should not be helping them develop their own internal systems that are based on possibly illegal replicas of for-sale US technology (Unix)

That was in response to your comment that I am a selfish a$$h%^3e because I buy only Japanese cars. You made me out to be a traitor because I prefer them for their quality and lower price tags and maintanence fees than most American cars in my price range. If this seems out of the blue to you, I suggest you reread that post.

And I know you aren't advocating we sell to China. I know to that you don't believe in a right to reimplement UNIX functionality. Get rid of BSD while you're at it, if Linux is an illegal replica, BSD of all flavors, including the BSD code in OSX and WindowsNT, is the granddaddy of illegal UNIX replicas. Hell, even BeOS and AtheOS/Syllable are probably illegal too even though they are not at all UNIX-like except for having modest support for POSIX because they violate someone's patent on scheduling, "memory allocation by a central program" (kernel), you get the idea....

148 posted on 09/05/2003 4:58:50 PM PDT by CodeMonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Absolutely I have an agenda. The protection of US citizens and their property.

Would you be surprised to hear that your words and behavior here broadcast a *different* agenda?

It's interesting, how we never see our own behavior the way others do.

Just notice how your arguments have pretty universally been rejected. Here, on FR, where we've got a rep for being very patriotic. Known patriots are rejecting your arguments. That means something.

It means this line of FUD is so silly it's amazing anyone, anywhere would push it unless, well, unless they had direct financial reimbursement to do so!

149 posted on 09/05/2003 4:59:55 PM PDT by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Always worth a mention, wouldn't you say. What else keeps us going sometimes? ;)

Ah, something we might be able to agree on :) And while Linux may be lacking in the booth babe department, there's always BSD.

150 posted on 09/05/2003 5:07:27 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic
I have to wonder why UNIX/Linux geeks would waste their time learning Windows programming just to create Windows viruses.

I think that someone is just so wrapped up in their delusions that they have to invent accusations without evidence.
151 posted on 09/05/2003 7:11:46 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Not sticking around for CodeMonkey's far out response about peace and love.

Translation:

I can't think of any more off-the wall, irrational rhetoric to throw out, and I certanly don't have any rational arguments to offer.
152 posted on 09/05/2003 7:16:53 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
I think that someone is just so wrapped up in their delusions that they have to invent accusations without evidence.

And praise organizations which do the same.

153 posted on 09/05/2003 7:50:16 PM PDT by TechJunkYard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Hi all,

I don't mean to piddle on anyone's petunias, and I'm in sync with the basic message here, but the Lenin quote seems to be an urban legend. Some years ago, Wllliam Safire wrote in his "On Language" column in the Sunday New York Times Magazine that he had asked the Library of Congress to document the quote, or anything like it. They could not. I will happily stand corrected if anyone can provide a checkable citation that pans out.

Dave
154 posted on 09/07/2003 4:21:45 PM PDT by dbabcock46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson