Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Its Time to Cast a Worried Eye Toward Yellowstone
YOWUSA ^ | 8/22/03 | Larry Park & Marshall Masters

Posted on 09/02/2003 8:36:03 PM PDT by Dixielander

Yesterday afternoon, a 4.4 magnitude earthquake occurred just 9 miles southeast of the south entrance to Yellowstone National Park. According to the USGS, “It is unlikely that there is a connection or triggering mechanism of the earthquake with the increased hydrothermal activity at Norris Geyser Basin, which is about 35 miles from the epicenter or with hydrothermal features in Yellowstone Lake that have received recent publicity.” However, given the shallow depth of this quake, the volcanism model developed by Larry Park has suddenly lurched us a huge step towards a worst-case eruption event.

Simply put, anyone living within 600 miles of Yellowstone could be sitting in a modern day Pompeii. In addition, for those living outside this area and West of the Mississippi river, there could be grievous consequences as well because systemic processes are now building beneath Yellowstone, that paint a very clear picture of a major eruption event in its early stages

In this article, Larry Park will present the science behind his warning. However, as the publisher of YOWUSA.COM, I wish to put some context to all this in layman’s terms as now as I personally feel the time has come for everyone living west of the Mississippi to become aware and to begin making a calm and deliberate assessment of the facts. This especially applies to those presently living within 600 miles of Yellowstone. However, what does the USGS say?

USGS, 07-February-2003

(Excerpt) Read more at yowusa.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: earthquake; usgs; volcano; yellowstone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last
To: colorado tanker
"What do I think?? I'm thinking eastern Colorado may not be far enough away." You could always move east. How about DC?
121 posted on 09/03/2003 4:40:25 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
Don't worry. Someone will explain why this is Clinton's fault.

Well DUH! There's a bulge under the lake...

122 posted on 09/03/2003 5:06:00 PM PDT by null and void (It's a hot swelling...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
P.S. Is yellowstone gonna blow?

Clinton is SOOOO there...

123 posted on 09/03/2003 5:07:29 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Taxman
That was my first thought! Blooming cars...
124 posted on 09/03/2003 5:34:55 PM PDT by dixie sass (GOD bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: okkev68
Well, when you consider the sun and moon not giving their light, becoming 'as blood'; 100-pound hailstones and rocks falling upon us along with mountains and who only knows what else capped off with fire burning a good portion of the world to a crisp; not to mention the "mother" of all earthquakes...I'd say such an event releates pretty well. Considering the lack of repentance among the people of this country; I'd say such a cataclysm is a bit overdue. (This is, of course; a condensed version. For ALL the details, read the LAST Book of the Bible.)
125 posted on 09/03/2003 5:45:35 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (Under the personal care of the Great Physician...full coverage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
P.S. Is yellowstone gonna blow?

I'd say probably not. Our ability to measure bulges in lake bottoms and such is very recent. It may be that this sort of thing happens fairly often without a cataclysmic result.

126 posted on 09/03/2003 5:55:06 PM PDT by Interesting Times (Tag line. You're it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
It's going to blow, but I wonder if humans will still live on the planet when it happens.
127 posted on 09/03/2003 6:17:31 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
When the Toba caldera in what is now Indonesia erupted some 74,000 years ago, it supposedly spewed a coupld of hundred cubic miles of volcanic ash into the atmosphere. That eruption--sorry, no human pollution activity can equal that!!--caused such a major cooling of the Earth's atmosphere that the food chain was severely affected.

Scientists who have studied mitochondria transmission in human generations note that a vast majority of strains of mitochondria just vanished just before 70,000 years ago, indicating a massive die-off of humans (and very likely higher mammals) in a very short period of time. If the Yellowstone volcanic caldera were to erupt again it could cause an extremely severe effect on the Earth's climate, and that could cause food production to drop to a tiny fraction of what we can currently produce. A 70-75% reduction of the human population within two generations would not be out of the question, sad to say.

Hopefully, such an eruption won't come in the next 200 years, so we'll have time to eventually have humans colonize the Moon, on large space colonies between the Earth and the Moon (using materials mined from the Moon), and even on Mars. So in 2203, if the Yellowstone caldera does go ka-blooey then, a large fraction of the human race will still be around because they'll no longer be affected by what a couple a hundred cubic miles of ash will do to the Earth's atmosphere. =)

128 posted on 09/03/2003 8:31:32 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Go to this site (Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy):

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planets.html

It has a chart of the gravitational effect of the moon and the planets on the earth.

Moon = 1

Jupiter = .01

Venus = .006

Saturn = .0007

Mars = .0002

Three planets have more effect on the earth than Mars.

Mars pull is .02% (two one-hundreths of one percent) than that of the moon.

In other words, the moons pull is 5000 times stronger and the tide produced by Mars is one millionth that of the moon.

129 posted on 09/03/2003 9:47:24 PM PDT by Wacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
Gine that the eruptions come one every 600,000 years, a mere +1% margin of error means you will have to hold your breath for a mere 6,000 years more.

The odds are good you don't have to sell your home tomorrow.

130 posted on 09/03/2003 9:54:05 PM PDT by Held_to_Ransom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: flying Elvis; lawdude
Fear Not.

"The Coming Superstorm" will put out any fires ignited by the volcano.

131 posted on 09/03/2003 9:56:56 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
It would settle out the ash, too...
132 posted on 09/04/2003 7:14:44 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
still think that a change in distance of 2.051 AU on Jan 1st of this year, down to a distance of .373 AU is not negligible, and that we may not yet understand nor appreciate the effect Mars has.

Considering a change of this magnitude occurs at least once each year you should have quite a large data set with which to work.

133 posted on 09/04/2003 7:41:20 AM PDT by Junior (Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: okkev68
Anybody got any thoughts on how an event like this could relate to bible prophecy and Revelations?

The fact that there's no clear reference to the United States but other countries can be identified in the text of the scripture?

EEEP!

134 posted on 09/04/2003 8:27:42 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
Our ability to measure bulges in lake bottoms and such is very recent. It may be that this sort of thing happens fairly often without a cataclysmic result.

This is true. However, it is not just a bulge in the lake bottom. It is accompanied by extreme rise in temperature of the lake, increase in earthquake activity, changes in periodicity of the geysers, increase in sulphur gases, and a bunch of park rangers changing their underwear more often.

135 posted on 09/04/2003 9:14:30 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: TBall
It's going to blow, but I wonder if humans will still live on the planet when it happens. Your assertion is the safest call. It will blow, but when is another story. One year from now or 100,000 years from now. Hard to argue with your point, at least as of today.
136 posted on 09/04/2003 9:16:21 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Wacka
Thank you for the link to that site. I will find this very helpful.

I concede that the Gravitational pull of Mars is not what is causing the bottom of the lake to rise. At least not by itself. Also it may not be gravity that causes the increase of volcanic activity.

137 posted on 09/04/2003 10:22:43 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Junior
You are correct. There are other astronomical conjunctions that have not been in play for a long time either. Can the relative position of all the other planets have an additive effect to the relative closeness of Mars? Maybe it's the additive effect of the other planets and the Moon, and Mars has nothing to do with it. Maybe the Yellowstone Caldera blows every 70,000 years because that's it birthday.
138 posted on 09/04/2003 10:27:04 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Held_to_Ransom
Given that the rising dome in the lakebed at yellowstone can only rise so far before 'popping', and it's not just the lake, the entire region is lifting, It would be interesting to find out what time period is called for on that rise. Now, if the ground starts going back down, I would say everything will be OK.
139 posted on 09/04/2003 10:30:53 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
I've been following this discussion, expecially between you and "interesting times" and I'd like to ask a general question of all. Does anyone here think that the only influence of the planet Mars on this planet is a gravitational one?

It's true the solar system/universe obeys mechanical laws, but does this mean that it therefore follows that it is all just mechanical? Our bodies follow mechanical laws but I suggest that our existence is much more than just a mechanical/chemical/scientificly explained existence.

In fact I would go so far as to say that we don't know squat. Everything we claim to know is theory, and all our theories will be someday replaced by even better theories, by those who think they know.

140 posted on 09/04/2003 11:34:47 AM PDT by Do Be
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson