Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McClintock Key to Democratic Victory in California
Intellectual Conservative.com ^ | 9/2/3 | Bob Chandra

Posted on 09/02/2003 4:21:28 PM PDT by socal_parrot

A Democratic plot to boost Tom McClintock’s candidacy at Arnold Schwarzenegger’s expense has recently come to light.

On paper, the recall election should be a cakewalk for California Republicans. A cursory analysis reveals a governor with an approval rating below Richard Nixon at his low point. The only serious Democrat candidate is the state’s uninspiring lieutenant governor, Cruz Bustamante, who unquestioningly followed Governor Davis through his mishaps with the budget and energy crisis. It should be a breeze for Republicans, right? Think again. Democrats are euphoric over Tom McClintock’s intransigence in continuing his long-shot bid for governor. This allows Democrats to divide and conquer their way into office. Democrats are attempting to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat and Tom McClintock is an essential part of their game plan.

For starters, Democrats know McClintock cannot win. They know that he has ran for statewide office twice before and lost both times. McClintock’s problem is not so much that he’s unknown but that Californians know about him and have rejected his candidacy time and again. Knowing this, a Democrat plot to boost McClintock’s candidacy at Schwarzenegger’s expense has already surfaced. According to the Sacramento Bee’s Daniel Weintraub, “Ever since Cruz Bustamante entered the race, it's been assumed that California's Indian tribes were going to pool their money and do independent expenditures on his behalf, expensive ads that get around the $21,000 limit on contributions. Now I am hearing rumblings that the Indians might think about helping Cruz in a more creative way as well. If they spent, say, $4 million on behalf of state Sen. Tom McClintock, the most conservative Republican in the race, they might pump McClintock's numbers up while hurting Arnold and not harming Cruz a bit. Remember, Cruz needs a split GOP vote to win. That would be one way to get it.” The reliably Democratic Indian tribes, loyal to Bustamante, would essentially throw their weight behind McClintock to chip away at the support of Arnold Schwarzenegger, the GOP front-runner. The Democrat strategy with regard to Tom McClintock is: “If you know you can beat ‘em, join ‘em.”

McClintock is unfazed by this conniving scheme and is more than happy to play along. His actions suggest that he’s willing to make allies with loyal Democratic groups under the logic, the enemy of my enemy (Arnold Schwarzenegger) is my friend. On August 28th, McClintock and Bustamante went together before the California Nations Indian Gaming Association to pledge their support. Needless to say, money will follow. Whether McClintock knows it or not, he’s being used by the Left. If Democrat allies can keep McClintock in the game, they can put a cap on Arnold’s support. A recent Los Angeles Times poll shows Bustamante with 35% of the vote and McClintock with 12%. The poll indicates that McClintock will lose decisively but more importantly, his vote will ensure that GOP front-runner Schwarzenegger loses as well.

It doesn’t have to be this way. McClintock could see the light and do what’s best for the party – as Bill Simon did by bowing out of the race. Other than his new Democratic support, the picture continues to grow bleaker for McClintock. The Washington Post and Sacramento Bee are reporting that there will be a record turnout for the recall election. This invalidates the early calculus by McClintock supporters - that in a low turnout election, grassroots could carry the day. Further, the base is growing more familiar with Schwarzenegger’s conservatism – Arnold came out against partial-birth abortion, against gay marriage, and for a constitutional spending cap.

There comes a time when personal ambition must be set aside and self-affirming but false justifications for one’s candidacy need to be reexamined. If McClintock stays in the California Senate, and assuming Arnold wins the governorship, he and Arnold could play the good-cop/bad-cop routine to perfection, mirroring President Bush and Tom Delay’s efforts at the national level. Additionally, McClintock may be well positioned to challenge Barbara Boxer in next year’s US Senate race. However, if McClintock persists with his spoiler campaign and throws the election to Bustamante, it is doubtful he will have any political capital for a future race.

But assuming things stay the way they are, with McClintock’s help, Bustamante and the Democrats may well pull off an upset of a lifetime on Election Day.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: arnold; cruz; dupes; mcclintites; mcjeffords; plot; rats; recall; stooges; tom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 741-760 next last
To: fieldmarshaldj
Nice self-portrait??? Is that Tom McCrackpot with his hands wrapped around you?
221 posted on 09/02/2003 5:58:19 PM PDT by Tempest (If you lay off of Arnold, I'll lay off of Tom. Bustamante is the real danger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
No.

That would be...

"A Broken Glass Republican Since Jimmy Carter boycotted the Summer Olympics".

Sue me...I was a kid...Sports were my life back then.
222 posted on 09/02/2003 5:58:20 PM PDT by A Broken Glass Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: A Broken Glass Republican
"Or maybe I'm confused"

Yes. DU is that way------->

223 posted on 09/02/2003 5:58:26 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
I hate the Democrats and the failed butcher Bustamante, but McC's presence in a race he can't win but could spoil has me mad as hell.
That doesn't serve the party or the people in any way CJ. I find that the hardest issue to ignore.
224 posted on 09/02/2003 5:58:44 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Riordan wouldn't have needed the ultraconservative vote

No, but he would have needed the mainstream Republican prolife, profamily Second Ammendment voters that make up the party base.

He couldn't do again what he did last time in LA. He fooled us all into thinking he was a Republican and we all campaigned and walked precincts for him. Then he fired all his Republican staff, endorsed Diane Feinstein and called Bill Clinton the greatest leader in the free world.

225 posted on 09/02/2003 5:58:51 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Even you CJ. What a shame. I didn't realize you had been taken in and infected by the wilful ignorance and pathetic diatribes of Arnold's star struck fanatics. Too bad.

226 posted on 09/02/2003 5:58:54 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
To: A Broken Glass Republican:

"A Broken Glass RINO"

Take your meds, Charles.

==

My, what convincing, logical, erudite argument you bring to the table. A real credit to the McClintockites.

227 posted on 09/02/2003 5:59:05 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
Thank you for a tremendously honest post.
228 posted on 09/02/2003 5:59:20 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (I cannot support a lipless cross eyed career politician who can't fill out paperwork correctly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Great points! Let's see:

Bill Press, Alan Colmes, Willie Brown, and the LASlimes support McClintock, while Karl Rove shouts: "Go Howard GO!" at a parade. Anyone else see a pattern here of rooting for the person in the other party least likely to win against your guy?

And if Arnold is so liberal, how come he is so hated by the left?
229 posted on 09/02/2003 5:59:27 PM PDT by alwaysconservative (California: Come on in to Republicanism, the water's fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: TheAngryClam
You must think then that denial is a river in Egypt!
230 posted on 09/02/2003 5:59:39 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: A Broken Glass Republican
... No Lieutenant Governor ... may serve in the same office for more than 2 terms. Cal.Const. Art. 5, § 11.

Cruz was elected Lt.Gov. in 1998 and re-elected in 2002. He cannot serve in the office again.
231 posted on 09/02/2003 5:59:56 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Xthe17th
Oh, and don't forget, his brilliant management "business sense" that y'all are hoping for in Kalaughafornia drove Planet Hollywood bust.

Planet Hollywood was, principally, Sylvester Stallone's baby.

Arnold's worth a half-billion dollars!

When you're got half that, you can criticize Arnold's business acumen.

232 posted on 09/02/2003 6:00:17 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from a shelter. You'll save a life, and enrich your own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Very good plan. We've just got to win this one. Then we've at least got a start. We simply CAN'T lose another sure thing. It would be the end of ANYTHING that is conservative or Republican in Red California.
233 posted on 09/02/2003 6:00:31 PM PDT by A Broken Glass Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
"This is a REPUBLICAN forum."

===

So what are YOU doing here? You appear to be agitating for Republican LOSS in the election.
234 posted on 09/02/2003 6:01:01 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
I know I don't think much of that attitude. It sure doesn't sound like something a good citizen would say.

Very well said, and I agree!

235 posted on 09/02/2003 6:01:22 PM PDT by alwaysconservative (California: Come on in to Republicanism, the water's fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
That's what I was thinking. Thanks.
236 posted on 09/02/2003 6:01:37 PM PDT by A Broken Glass Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
"The nerve of you to say that Arnold isn't a Republican because he doesn't meet your standards."

He isn't.

"Guess you are a solid Republican and supported President Bush in 1988 and 1992 along with Dole in 1996 and President G.W. Bush in 2000?"

Yup.

"I know I have voted for Republicans my whole life, and I consider Arnold a Republican."

I know having an authentic intellectual conversation with a RINO is difficult, but have you ever heard of Vito Marcantonio ? He was a "Republican", too. Would you have voted for him ?

237 posted on 09/02/2003 6:01:38 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
True, compared to me, you are flaming leftist. Yet, I choose to support ANY Republican candidate who can oust Davis and thwart Bustamante, and I do so in good conscience.
238 posted on 09/02/2003 6:01:52 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Xthe17th
Oh, and don't forget, his brilliant management "business sense" that y'all are hoping for in Kalaughafornia drove Planet Hollywood bust.

Arnold had no role in the management of PH. He, Stallone and other celebs agreed to certain promotional chores for the chain in exchange for stock shares.

There's plenty of negative stuff on Arnold that's true. Stick to the true stuff.
239 posted on 09/02/2003 6:02:15 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: A Broken Glass Republican
No. What year is he term-limited-out?

2006

240 posted on 09/02/2003 6:02:19 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 741-760 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson