Skip to comments.
When Sex Ed Becomes Porn 101
Heritage Foundation ^
| 8/27/03
| Robert E. Rector
Posted on 09/01/2003 9:31:21 AM PDT by Jean S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 last
To: pram
You really have to be very careful when you consider on-line charter schools offered by the state. Parents who use them are no longer homeschoolers and their children are public school students subjected to the same garbage as a child who attends a brick and mortar school.
I hope your friend passed the word along to her fellow homeschoolers (the real ones).
My brother in CA pulled his daughter out of a supposedly good public school and put her into a Christian school. He didn't like what was going on.
61
posted on
09/02/2003 9:03:11 AM PDT
by
ladylib
To: pram
Yes, my post was about Florida.....11 years ago....
I stayed in touch with this curriculum at some level until he graduated from highschool.
The poster who made the statement that no one he/she knows has been subjected to this 'porno ed'.....and implied, therefore that it doesn't exist.
It exists where there is a void of involved parents watchdogging their children's schools.....!
And yes, it is Planned Parenthood trying to control the curriculum....
...Planned Parenthood.../ Sex Ed.....Follow the dots!!
62
posted on
09/02/2003 9:43:31 AM PDT
by
Guenevere
(..., ..Press on!)
To: mattdono
It seems that the "gay lobby" (read: almost every person in show business...at least it seems) has made it chic to be gay. What I find weird and (of course) 100% hypocritical is that gay people talk about being born this way or it being a "lifestyle" choice. Ok, so why is it somehow "wrong", "uncool", or whatever to be a heterosexual? The first law of homosexuality:
'Homosexuals' don't reproduce, they recruit
Also, no mention of the growing number of ex-'homosexuals' is ever tolerated. Funny how you can be recruited 'into' homosexuality but never, ever, ever cured out of it.
63
posted on
09/02/2003 11:22:16 AM PDT
by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: Scenic Sounds
Should this kind of information only be provided to kids in private schools? NO. It should not be provided to kids at all. They'll have plenty of time to learn about condoms after they are married.
All of institutional (as opposed to familial) sex ed can be summed up in a few short sentences:
Don't have sex before you're married. If you do you will screw up your life. Leave adult problems to the adults.
64
posted on
09/02/2003 11:31:39 AM PDT
by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: JeanS
big bump - NEA wants your children
65
posted on
09/02/2003 11:36:46 AM PDT
by
sasafras
(sasafras (The road to hell is paved with good intentions))
To: mtbopfuyn
All I hope is that I don't get teachers with an "agenda". So far it's been ok. I don't think the professor realized how offensive his guest speaker was, until we all spoke up.
Having to watch that must have been very uncomfortable for you. It would be like walking in on your folks :-/
66
posted on
09/02/2003 1:52:07 PM PDT
by
TheSpottedOwl
(This cow is independently owned and operated)
To: cyncooper
I really don't know why condom demonstrations are required in any schools at all, so I shan't lose a wink of sleep worrying that some elite private school kids get to watch this nonsense while some public school children are deprived of the spectacle, no matter how "matter of factly" it is done.Actually, the major reason for my post was to dispel the notion that sex-ed was the peculiar creature of public schools. ;-)
To: JeanS
I graduated in 1991. The most in depth thing that happened in school was in my Human Relations class, rather than sex-ed. Even that was very mild compared to now. The biggest thing that happened was (1) a couple from the crisis pregnancy center gave a talk (2) the class president -- who wound up pregnant -- gave a talk (both were talks about it can happen the first time) and (3) the health dept. showed gross slides of what stds look like.
As far as sex-ed class... I remember some silly film (c. early 1980s) in seventh grade about some girl getting pregnant and having to forget about her track career. When interviewed and ask how long she thought she would have to care for her child, her answer was 4 or 5 years. I was only 12 and thought she was a bonehead.
68
posted on
09/02/2003 6:46:12 PM PDT
by
HungarianGypsy
(Are we really arrogant? Or are they just jealous of us?)
To: John O
All of institutional (as opposed to familial) sex ed can be summed up in a few short sentences: Don't have sex before you're married. If you do you will screw up your life. Leave adult problems to the adults.
It seems to me that you have to teach students something about sex. You can't just tell them that the stork brings babies. Or can you? ;-)
To: ElkGroveDan
Ping
70
posted on
09/03/2003 2:46:06 PM PDT
by
Gophack
Comment #71 Removed by Moderator
Comment #72 Removed by Moderator
To: upright_citizen
Thanks for setting me straight.
(rolling my eyes)
To: Scenic Sounds
It seems to me that you have to teach students something about sex. Exactly right. that's why we have parents. It's not the gov's job to teach our kids about sex. No metter what the gov teaches they will be wrong. Each parent must educate their own children
(Yes I mean abolish the gov schools entirely)
74
posted on
09/04/2003 5:40:12 AM PDT
by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: John O
(Yes I mean abolish the gov schools entirely)Didn't Mexico used to have that system? ;-)
75
posted on
09/04/2003 9:09:53 AM PDT
by
Scenic Sounds
("Don't mind people grinnin' in your face." - Son House)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson