Skip to comments.
N.Y. Regrades Standardized Math Test That Most High-Schoolers Had Failed
AP ^
| 8/30/03
| Michael Gormley
Posted on 08/30/2003 6:00:33 PM PDT by Jean S
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) - State officials have regraded a standardized math test that most New York high-schoolers failed this year, transforming failing marks into passing ones for thousands of students.
Rather than rescoring all the math Regents exams, the state Department of Education released tables Friday to regrade the tests to more closely match the 2002 test results. For example, a ninth- or 10th-grader who received a 47 percent or 48 percent score in June now has a passing grade of 65.
The recalculations mean the number of students passing rose from 28 percent to 55 percent for 12th-graders, from 28 percent to 60 percent for 11th-graders, from 28 percent to 64 percent for 10th-graders and from 61 percent to 80 percent for ninth-graders. The calculations are based on the scores from 400 of the state's 700 school districts.
An independent panel appointed by the state Board of Regents calculated the table based on the results of the June 2002 test results. "It essentially corrects for the anomalies of the June 2003 exam," state Education Commissioner Richard Mills said.
The panel was created because of high failure rates that prompted the state to throw out the test, which is usually required for graduation. Thousands of students in June faced the possibility of being held back from graduation days before the ceremony.
After education officials received hundreds of calls and e-mails from angry parents and teachers, Mills gave school districts the option of discarding the scores and substituting coursework results for upperclassmen who needed a passing grade to graduate.
Juniors and seniors who took the test now will have the option of using the new, higher test score or their course grade.
AP-ES-08-30-03 2022EDT
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: matheducation; testing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
1
posted on
08/30/2003 6:00:33 PM PDT
by
Jean S
To: JeanS
Words just totally fail me.
2
posted on
08/30/2003 6:02:48 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Words I can post on FR, anyway....)
To: JeanS
If we keep passing kids on even when they haven't learned.... aren't the consequences obvious?
3
posted on
08/30/2003 6:03:29 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: JeanS
No wonder companies are going overseas to fill jobs.
Indians work for less, but the bottom line is that they are EDUCATED and SPEAK ENGLISH!!
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: xm177e2
.... aren't the consequences obvious?
Maybe along the lines of dumbed down voters?
Keeping people ignorant benefits people in power.
(especially democrats)
6
posted on
08/30/2003 6:08:20 PM PDT
by
OneTime
To: JeanS
New York employers should obtain the test and then give the test to new applicants for employment. Hire those that pass under the old standards. End of problem.
7
posted on
08/30/2003 6:08:23 PM PDT
by
TaMoDee
To: JeanS

"The failing children are thousands of potential Democrat loyal voters for me.
Use the stolen FBI files on the teachers now.
Tell them "2 + 2 equals exactly whatever the children want. Five. Nine. I dont care.
Use the stolen files now -- as before."
8
posted on
08/30/2003 6:13:21 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: TaMoDee
>>New York employers should obtain the test and then give the test to new applicants for employment. Hire those that pass under the old standards.<<
And be accused of racism?
9
posted on
08/30/2003 6:19:25 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been suspended or banned.)
To: Diogenesis
They need more money.
So this means that 45% got below 47 on an already dumbed down state test.
It would be interesting to ask students on the test what pol party they most identified with!
10
posted on
08/30/2003 6:20:15 PM PDT
by
At _War_With_Liberals
(If Hillary ever takes the oath of office, she will be the last President the US will ever have. -RR)
To: null and void
My niece passed the exam with a 72 score. Regrading it is an insult to her and others who passed.
11
posted on
08/30/2003 6:21:32 PM PDT
by
mafree
To: JeanS
I've seen this all my life. If someone(s) can't meet a standard they lower the bar so everyone feels good. They call it "being fair".
The long term results are disasterous. IMHO
12
posted on
08/30/2003 6:22:22 PM PDT
by
martian_22
(Can't put your finger on the problem?)
To: JeanS
Nothing new here.
Try to get the records for the number of high school grade students who made the honor roll this year vs 1993 vs 1983 vs 1973 compared to the total student population as far back as you can.
Find out what the grades were for achieving honor roll status then and now.
Get copies of the sample tests for those years.
None of the above will be possible unless you're willing to sue your school district for the information but it might be worth the effort.
Last time I hired a kid I asked if he had any questions BEFORE we began the interview.
"How long do I have to work before I get a vacation"?
Next!
13
posted on
08/30/2003 6:23:13 PM PDT
by
JimVT
To: JeanS
Just think...in about 4 years, some of these remarkable scholars will be teachers.
14
posted on
08/30/2003 6:25:23 PM PDT
by
neutrino
(Oderint dum metuant: Let them hate us, so long as they fear us.)
To: JeanS
Just think...in about 4 years, some of these remarkable scholars will be teachers.
15
posted on
08/30/2003 6:25:23 PM PDT
by
neutrino
(Oderint dum metuant: Let them hate us, so long as they fear us.)
To: Jeff Chandler
What racism? That was not even mentioned in the article.
16
posted on
08/30/2003 6:27:40 PM PDT
by
cyborg
(i'm half and half... me mum is a muggle and me dad is a witch)
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; Black Agnes; BobFromNJ; Brad's Gramma; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; ...
ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent miscellaneous ping list.
17
posted on
08/30/2003 6:29:23 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(Is the DemocRATic party extinct yet?)
To: JimVT
When I got my first job at fifteen, all I could think about was making as much MONEY as possible so I could buy science fiction books and magazines. Vacation never even entered my mind till I got laid off and got a $200 check in the mail :D
18
posted on
08/30/2003 6:29:53 PM PDT
by
cyborg
(i'm half and half... me mum is a muggle and me dad is a witch)
To: JeanS
Ah, New York. HillaryLand. Home of creative learning, unpopularly implimented a few years ago. For example, if a kid said the answer to 2+2 is 365, he could get points for the creativity of his answer, even though his answer was incorrect, mathamatically speaking.
It takes a villiage, you know.
19
posted on
08/30/2003 6:30:19 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: TaMoDee
New York employers should obtain the test and then give the test to new applicants for employment. Hire those that pass under the old standards. End of problem.
Naw. Just ask them to multiply 12x13 in their head. Now.
That'll seperate the chaff from the wheat in no time.
20
posted on
08/30/2003 6:35:40 PM PDT
by
yankeedame
("Born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson