Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plotters beware: Don't mess with the CN Tower
The Globe and Mail ^ | August 28, 2003 | Luma Muhtadie

Posted on 08/28/2003 8:04:55 AM PDT by Loyalist

Ambitious terrorist plotters had better beware: Experts say the world's tallest free-standing structure is solid enough to foil any mastermind.

Given its one-of-a-kind reinforced concrete construction, engineers who designed and built the CN Tower say it would not suffer the fate of the World Trade Center towers if it were attacked in the same way.

"The most likely outcome is that the plane would shear apart and fall to the ground," said CN Tower president Bud Purves.

"The tower was designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, earthquakes, fires, lightning strikes and more than 200 km/h winds -- it's a remarkable edifice," Mr. Purves said.

Concern over the famed Toronto landmark was raised again recently, with the arrest of 19 men living in the Toronto area who are being held on suspicion of terrorist activity. Antiterrorism agents have suggested that the group's pattern of activities resembles that of the 19 airplane hijackers who struck U.S. targets on Sept. 11, 2001. And Canadian government lawyers argue that the men may have wanted to "find out the measurements and schematics" of the CN Tower and other North American buildings.

Jutting into the sky at 553.33 metres, the CN Tower seems an obvious terrorist target.

But Jamil Mardukhi, who has worked on the tower's construction as a designer and site engineer for more than 30 years, offers several sound reasons for plotters to think again.

The World Trade Center towers comprised steel columns, floors and beams that ignited and melted when two aircraft slammed into them. The result was a progressive structural collapse.

The CN Tower, by contrast, is built of 40,538 cubic metres of reinforced concrete.

"During the design phase in the late 60s and early 70s, we looked at what would happen if a Boeing 707 [the largest passenger plane at the time] hit the tower accidentally," Mr. Mardukhi of N.C.K. Engineering Ltd. said.

"The modelled computer analysis showed there would be local damage -- a hole in the tower at the place of impact -- but that the structure would still stand." The CN Tower begins nearly seven metres underground, with a foundation of more than 450 metric tonnes of reinforcing steel embedded in thick concrete that rests on a base of hand- and machine-smoothed shale.

The reinforced concrete shaft with a hexagonal core and three curved support arms extends for another 335 metres above ground.

More than 1,500 people worked non-stop for 40 weeks starting in the spring of 1973, pouring the concrete continuously into a mould to prevent the formation of "cold joints." These deep fissures develop when concrete is allowed to dry, rendering the structure penetrable to water (which freezes and expands in the winter causing cracks in the concrete); or worse, to flammable fluids.

To maintain consistency, all the concrete had to come from the same source and workers mixed all of it on site, continuously testing and retesting it. Once the concrete dried, the steel post-tensioning cables embedded within it were stretched taut with jacks to keep the tower under constant compressive forces.

Perched at 338 metres is the seven-storey Skypod, which houses microwave receivers, observation decks, two restaurants and various technical rooms for broadcasters.

The Skypod sits like a doughnut around the hexagonal concrete core, its steel floors and columns covered with drywall, concrete and various sprays that make it fire-resistant. Finally, the antenna, a slim, stacked broadcasting receptor rising from the shaft above the pod, is enveloped by a thick fibreglass jacket.

Materials identical to those of the Skypod were subjected to furnace flames in rigorous lab tests, revealing that the pod would have to burn for two hours before any of its structural members failed, Mr. Mardukhi said.


TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; cntower; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Sounds a little too much like famous last words.

1 posted on 08/28/2003 8:04:56 AM PDT by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
The Titanic was "unsinkable", too.
2 posted on 08/28/2003 8:06:36 AM PDT by TomServo ("It says that one time this big lobster came and attacked a lady, but Mr. Ed saved her.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
If they're going to hit something, I'd rather it be that tall landmark rather than a large office building or mall filled with innocents.
3 posted on 08/28/2003 8:11:32 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
And this tower is where?
4 posted on 08/28/2003 8:18:07 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Toronto, Province of Ontario, Canada.

Michael

5 posted on 08/28/2003 8:21:35 AM PDT by Wright is right! (Have a profitable day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Sort of like, "God Himself could not sink this ship."
6 posted on 08/28/2003 8:23:05 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (The thing I like about myself the most is that I never, ever boast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Let's not test this theory.
7 posted on 08/28/2003 8:27:40 AM PDT by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
The tangos would never hurt their friends in Canada.

They want to hijack Canadian planes to attack the USA.

8 posted on 08/28/2003 8:28:26 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
A 707 crashing into CN Tower is one thing. However, today's larger widebody jet airliners (A330-200/300, A340 series, 777-200ER and 747) carry a LOT more jet fuel and the new widebody airliners are bigger than a 707; a 747 fully loaded with fuel crashing into CN Tower may have enough mass and explosive force from the jet fuel to bring down the tower. =(
9 posted on 08/28/2003 8:30:06 AM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
The CN Tower begins nearly seven metres underground

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

OH come on. this is only 23 feet get real!!!

10 posted on 08/28/2003 8:51:42 AM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER (Citizen Carry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
A 707 crashing into CN Tower is one thing. However, today's larger widebody jet airliners (A330-200/300, A340 series, 777-200ER and 747) carry a LOT more jet fuel and the new widebody airliners are bigger than a 707; a 747 fully loaded with fuel crashing into CN Tower may have enough mass and explosive force from the jet fuel to bring down the tower. =( '

xxxx


It may still stand, but if it hit the resturant area everyone will be gone and the tower would still be standing.
11 posted on 08/28/2003 8:52:48 AM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER (Citizen Carry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
WTC withstood the airplanes. It was the fire that brought them down.
12 posted on 08/28/2003 8:53:39 AM PDT by Jumpmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
I was going to write something pithy about the WTC being built to those same standards, but then I realized that if a plane were to head into the CN Tower, it would likely shear off the part of the tower above the impact point instead of pancaking the structure underneath.
13 posted on 08/28/2003 8:54:49 AM PDT by steveegg (I have one thing to say to the big spenders; BLIZZARD OF RECALL TOUR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Loyalist
"The tower was designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707..."

Please correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that EXACTLY what the World Trade Center was designed to survive?

I know I've heard this sentence 30 or 40 times since 9-11.

15 posted on 08/28/2003 8:56:07 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
in the late 60s and early 70s, we looked at what would happen if a Boeing 707 [the largest passenger plane at the time]

What is he talking about? The Boeing 747 went into production in 1969.

16 posted on 08/28/2003 8:58:08 AM PDT by Alouette (The bombing begins in five minutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
Thats exactly what I was thinking.
17 posted on 08/28/2003 8:59:14 AM PDT by holdmuhbeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MD_Willington_1976
Why would they hit the CN tower when they could do all of us Canadians and Americans a favour and hit this when the house is in session.

This comment is a bit over the top.

18 posted on 08/28/2003 9:00:42 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln (God Bless the arsenal of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Well, we have less than two months before the Concorde stops flying commercially, so the terrorists better hurry up and see if they can use one to knock down the Eiffel tower.

That would be a riot, too, 'cause they would have to use a British Airways plane to do it, since Air France already quit flying the Concorde.
19 posted on 08/28/2003 9:01:05 AM PDT by RonHolzwarth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
If a plane hit the shaft, it probably wouldn't do a lot of damage. The jet fuel would fall to the ground instead of going into the column. If it hit the top globe thing, it would like knock that down, but the tall pillar would probably remain standing.
20 posted on 08/28/2003 9:01:55 AM PDT by Koblenz (There's usually a free market solution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson