Posted on 08/25/2003 12:29:46 PM PDT by Let's Roll
Edited on 04/23/2004 12:05:51 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Civil Liberties After 9/11 Alarmism puts Americans' safety at risk.
BY ROBERT H. BORK Monday, August 25, 2003 12:01 a.m.
When a nation faces deadly attacks on its citizens at home and abroad, it is only reasonable to expect that its leaders will take appropriate measures to increase security. And since security inevitably means restrictions, it is likewise only reasonable to expect a public debate over the question of how much individual liberty should be sacrificed for how much individual and national safety. That, however, is not the way our national debate has shaped up. From the public outcry over the Bush administration's measures to combat terrorism, one might suppose that America is well on the way to becoming a police state. A full-page newspaper ad by the American Civil Liberties Union, for instance, informs us that the Patriot Act, the administration's major security initiative, goes "far beyond fighting terrorism" and has "allowed government agents to violate our civil liberties--tapping deep into the private lives of innocent Americans."
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
It took a while to get to, but I found what I think is Bork's point.
And, I agree~~we should vigilantly protect our rights---but not turn those rights into a suicide pact.
Quite a challenge.
It is precisely because we "sacrificed" individual liberty for "...national safety" that up to 3,000 fellow citizens died on September 11, 2001.
The enemy would not have blended in to our population as plastic knife wielding hijackers if the right of a private airline company to allow their passengers to be armed on their private property was not unconstitutionally denied by our government.
There is no way the terrorist of September 11, 2001 would even attempted to hijack a commercial aircraft if 10, 40, 60 good U.S. citizens would have been armed.
The odds of a successful hijack would have been astronomical.
With the continued threat of terrorism, we citizens should be exerting our right to keep and bear arms, not relinquishing that right even more.
BZZZzzzzzztttt ! Wrong!
Evil is:
Insinerating inosent people, from more than 80 countries around the world, as they do their morning email, spraying them with exploding jet fuel at more than 1500 degrees. Pulverizing their burned bodies as they're thrown from 80 story windows to a flatening death on New York city pavement, leaving only flecks of skin and hair to be picked over months and months later at fresh kills land fill, THAT IS EVIL, and it was done to thousands of my people.
What's more? It continues to be done to inosent people around the world on a daily basis. If these whack-jobs want something to b*tch about, this is it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.