Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voters Don't Want Bush Re-Elected - Poll
Voice of America ^ | 8/24/03

Posted on 08/24/2003 6:07:43 AM PDT by truthandlife

The majority of American voters would not like to see President Bush re-elected to another term according to a poll by Newsweek magazine.

The survey released Saturday showed that 49 percent of registered voters would not back the president for a second term if the vote were held now. Forty-four percent would support Mr. Bush's re-election.

The poll marked the first time in a Newsweek survey that supporters of Mr. Bush were out-numbered by those who would not like to see him back remain in office. In April, 52 percent of voters backed the president for a second term, while 38 percent did not.

The Newsweek report attributed the decline in the president's popularity to public disenchantment over the Iraq war. The poll found 69 percent of respondents said they were concerned that the United States will be bogged down for many years in Iraq without achieving its goals there.

Nearly half of those polled said they were concerned that the cost of the war will lead to a large budget deficit and seriously impact the U.S. economy. And more than half said they thought the estimated $1 billion per week the United States is paying for the war effort is too much and should be scaled back.

However, 61 percent still believe the United States was right to take military action against Iraq in March.

Only 18 percent of those polled believe a stable, democratic government can be set up in Iraq in the long term. And only 13 percent of respondents said U.S. efforts to establish security in Iraq and rebuild the country have gone well since May 1, when combat officially ended.

The Newsweek poll results are based on telephone interviews with more than one thousand adults aged 18 and older. It was conducted on August 21 and 22. The margin of error is plus or minus three percent.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; electionspresident; polls; reelection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 next last
To: truthandlife
Shows what 18 months of (deliberate) hype and bad news "predictions" from the demo's will do ...

Not that the national press corpse had anything to do with promoting those lies, of course.
81 posted on 08/24/2003 8:28:47 AM PDT by tealcandtrip (I need a tag line ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; grania
The proper term here is "plurality",

It's pretty pathetic that Newsweak can't even get the terminology correct.

Maybe they hired the guy from NASA who screwed up the kilometers/miles thing on that Mars probe. ;-)

82 posted on 08/24/2003 8:30:57 AM PDT by StriperSniper (The Federal Register is printed on pulp from The Tree Of Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
Me too, I want a conservative president that will fight to end the (progressive) income tax. And fight to end massive imigration. Maybe even get rid of a few "departments" like education and energy.

The country is being over run and the GOP doesn't give a damn. What the hell is wrong with the GOP?
Every month we lose 70,000 manurfacturing jobs and the GOP doesn't give a damn.
We have a 500 billion dollar trade deficent and the GOP doesn't give a damn.
We have a 500 billion dollar udget deficet and the GOP doesn't give a damn.
We have massive out soucring of middle class jobs and the GOP doesn't give a damn.
We have government growing bigger under Bush then under Clinton!!!

Yea I am really looking forward to 4 more years of this crap.

83 posted on 08/24/2003 8:51:57 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
I intend to vote for G.W. Bush because he's strong on defense, is waging the war on terror, is a strong leader and because he's the most electable conservative candidate.

But you see, I'm a Freeper, I'm a true conservative and have been for more than three decades and I understand these things and understand what a president's most important role is, and I want to see this country returned to the values that made it great.

What you have to realize, though, is that people like us are in the minority in this country. You can quote every poll in the world about how many people call themselves conservative, how many people call themselves liberal, etc. And I will still contend that "true" conservatives like we are are in a minority, just as the real radical leftists are in a minority as well. Where elections are decided is in the middle.

It was the middle that gave Reagan his big majority in '84 ... or do you think everyone who voted for him in places like New York, etc., all favored true conservatism?

I told you, I can make a philosophical argument that the overtime rules in question are arcane and do not apply to the way things are in 2003.

However, it is issues like those that do resonate with those voters in the middle ... many of whom, whether it's stupidity or not, have structured their economic situation around the fact that they have regular overtime coming in ... who have often shown an inclination to vote for us even if they really don't buy our entire agenda. I just said this in another thread, there are people out there who vote for us, who like tax cuts, who like our position on social issues, who like our positions on defense, the war on terror, etc. ... but who at the same time have no great inclination to undo the New Deal and Great Society, and who have been conditioned to look to the president of the U.S. as the individual responsible for keeping them employed.

So from a political standpoint, is it not utter madness to do something to piss those folks off, and that rightly or wrongly simply invites caricature as the eeeeevilll GOP kowtowing to the corporate special interests and stepping on the throats of the little people, a year before a presidential election?

I truly believe the economic situation is turning around. I pray that things are better by the spring of next year at the latest, I think we need six months of good economic news before the election to make it a lot easier to seal this deal.

But if things don't turn around, and the farther we get removed from 9/11, I believe that in that middle group of voters that decides elections, the war on terror, defense, etc., are going to become secondary to economic issues, because those are the issues that are more tangible to people.

And yes, I'd like to see Howard Dean get the Dem nomination, because I think he'd be the easiest of the crew to beat.

84 posted on 08/24/2003 8:57:29 AM PDT by GB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
This is deceptive reporting. The "anyone but Bush" option is the way to inflate the vote for the opponent, since each person gets to envision his ideal candiate. Ask about real candidates, anbd the numbers drop vastly.

I can certainly imagine a preferable an alternative to Bush, as could just about everyone here.
85 posted on 08/24/2003 8:58:01 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
The guy was a hero just a short time ago. This poll is for the birds - OBVIOUSLY!
86 posted on 08/24/2003 8:58:42 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GB
Good points. The best one was this: We true Conservatives are in the minority. Thus, we have to be mature enough to choose the better of two flawed candiadtes. Never let Perfect become the enemy of Good in politics!
87 posted on 08/24/2003 9:06:53 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: montag813
... then his base would be more excited.

And maybe I, and so many other conservatives, would become a part of his base. Till then, I don't see muchh about him that I like. Better moral charachter than Clinton by far, but no real difference in the direction the country is being moved. Or any genuine effort to change that direction, or even to discuss whether it's the right or wrong direction.

88 posted on 08/24/2003 9:16:31 AM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
Perfect become the enemy of Good in politics!

Perfection is an unattainable ideal. An ideal that should never be forgotten and should always be the director of our goals. Otherwise we end up blowing in the direction the wind of popular whim blows; we become the followers instead of the leaders.

89 posted on 08/24/2003 9:20:45 AM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
Don't underestimate him on the economic issue, which is the only issue the Dems have (albeit, its #1). I listened to Dean during one of the CSPAN debates, the message he puts forth on things like pension reform, the abuses of the corporate sector, this overtime thing, etc. If he grabs hold of this jobs offshoring issue, watch out, he can make a formidable argument on the economy. And please, don't flame me about "what would Dean do to fix it". He doesn't have to say anything about that, the challenger need only attack the incumbent. Of course Dean has no real ideas, but alot of middle class people are not politically in touch as we are here, they would vote for him as an "economic reformer".
90 posted on 08/24/2003 9:26:37 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
This newsqueak poll reminds me of psychiatrists who are hired by lawyers to testify in court. One is telling the truth (that's usually the one who has treated the patient for sometime), and the other shrink who interviewed the patient for 30 minutes last week. The latter is nothing more than a medical prostitute. He will produce the desired result for money. The same is true for polls. This newsqueak poll is trying to produce the desired result: put more socialists in power. Newsqueak is a political prostitute.
91 posted on 08/24/2003 9:29:22 AM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
The result of offshoring and outsourcing is net downwards social mobility for middle class Americans. And let us leave aside the fact that without the low-semi skilled stable manufacturing jobs that have been shipped overseas it is not possible to work your way out of the ghetto.

The president is expected to at least notice, not to respond with some bogus "retraining" nonsense. This has Americans scared.

And what if we have another high fuel bill harsh winter ? Bush will be toast in the Northeast and Midwest.
92 posted on 08/24/2003 9:33:58 AM PDT by Tokhtamish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Tokhtamish
What's bogus about retraining? Nothing! It is an individual's obligation. And his only salvation!
93 posted on 08/24/2003 9:40:20 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Bush I fell because he was perceived by people as not scknowledging that a recession existed.

A president who at least perceives a problem will be preferred by people over a president who does not.
94 posted on 08/24/2003 9:48:49 AM PDT by Tokhtamish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
I'm counting on:
1. Demons following like sheep to the rants of the left.
2. GW getting more solid on key issues, and
3. People like you and me not capitulating.
95 posted on 08/24/2003 10:15:06 AM PDT by AMNZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
The Newsweek poll results are based on telephone interviews with more than one thousand adults aged 18 and older.

That is a real representitive sample considering that about 30% of these respondants will be voters.

96 posted on 08/24/2003 10:24:51 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Save Traditional Marriage -- It's for the Children!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

Why vote for RINO Bush, when we can resurrect Tom MadClintock as the annual Hedgehog Candidate for Gov or President?

97 posted on 08/24/2003 10:31:16 AM PDT by carbon14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
oldest liberal jagoff trick in the book...make a candidate run against himself in a poll...sorry beltway buttbuddies, voting is an antithetical process. either/or. sometimes you vote for a candidate, sometimes you vote against the other guy. but to suggest that the question is straight up or down is crap. this isn't the californicatia recall vote and the dimbulbs in the editorial offices know that. shame they are having such difficulty filling their pages with substantive news and choose to pursue their fantasies at the expense of their readers edification.
98 posted on 08/24/2003 10:36:34 AM PDT by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
I see the "Voice of Amerika" is at it again...
99 posted on 08/24/2003 10:41:09 AM PDT by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
The good news is, I guess they are finally conceding that he was ELECTED. ;)
100 posted on 08/24/2003 10:42:56 AM PDT by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson