Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Dinosaur Species Found in India
AP ^ | August 13, 2003 | RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM

Posted on 08/13/2003 9:02:05 PM PDT by nwrep

New Dinosaur Species Found in India
2 hours, 55 minutes ago
Add Top Stories - AP to My Yahoo!

By RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM, Associated Press Writer

BOMBAY, India - U.S. and Indian scientists said Wednesday they have discovered a new carnivorous dinosaur species in India after finding bones in the western part of the country.

Photo
AP Photo


Missed Tech Tuesday?
Check out the powerful new PDA crop, plus the best buys for any budget


The new dinosaur species was named Rajasaurus narmadensis, or "Regal reptile from the Narmada," after the Narmada River region where the bones were found.

The dinosaurs were between 25-30 feet long, had a horn above their skulls, were relatively heavy and walked on two legs, scientists said. They preyed on long-necked herbivorous dinosaurs on the Indian subcontinent during the Cretaceous Period at the end of the dinosaur age, 65 million years ago.

"It's fabulous to be able to see this dinosaur which lived as the age of dinosaurs came to a close," said Paul Sereno, a paleontologist at the University of Chicago. "It was a significant predator that was related to species on continental Africa, Madagascar and South America."

Working with Indian scientists, Sereno and paleontologist Jeff Wilson of the University of Michigan reconstructed the dinosaur skull in a project funded partly by the National Geographic (news - web sites) Society.

A model of the assembled skull was presented Wednesday by the American scientists to their counterparts from Punjab University in northern India and the Geological Survey of India during a Bombay news conference.

Scientists said they hope the discovery will help explain the extinction of the dinosaurs and the shifting of the continents — how India separated from Africa, Madagascar, Australia and Antarctica and collided with Asia.

The dinosaur bones were discovered during the past 18 years by Indian scientists Suresh Srivastava of the Geological Survey of India and Ashok Sahni, a paleontologist at Punjab University.

When the bones were examined, "we realized we had a partial skeleton of an undiscovered species," Sereno said.

The scientists said they believe the Rajasaurus roamed the Southern Hemisphere land masses of present-day Madagascar, Africa and South America.

"People don't realize dinosaurs are the only large-bodied animal that lived, evolved and died at a time when all continents were united," Sereno said.

The cause of the dinosaurs' extinction is still debated by scientists. The Rajasaurus discovery may provide crucial clues, Sereno said.

India has seen quite a few paleontological discoveries recently.

In 1997, villagers discovered about 300 fossilized dinosaur eggs in Pisdura, 440 miles northeast of Bombay, that Indian scientists said were laid by four-legged, long-necked vegetarian creatures.

Indian scientists said the dinosaur embryos in the eggs may have suffocated during volcanic eruptions.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: acanthostega; antarctica; australia; catastrophism; crevolist; dino; dinosaurs; godsgravesglyphs; ichthyostega; india; madagascar; narmadabasin; narmadensis; paleontology; rajasaurus; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,141-2,1602,161-2,1802,181-2,200 ... 3,121-3,129 next last
To: Right Wing Professor
Sounds like a good idea. If he knowingly put his name to something for other than sloppy reasons, we don't need to be using him.
2,161 posted on 08/22/2003 11:34:01 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2151 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Uh, perhaps rather than assuming I understood you wrong, maybe just maybe you need to communicate your thoughts better.
2,162 posted on 08/22/2003 11:35:55 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2157 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
So less than half a dozen creationists have some disagreement on what is an ape skull and what is a human skull. So? By the way, why is it that the earliest fully formed humans are usually dark skinned? I know science says life arose out of Africa (geographically closer than say America), but the early pictures of upright apes show him with human hands and human feet (something you can't tell from a skull)and then he loses his fur and becomes a rather angular featured black man.
2,163 posted on 08/22/2003 11:42:11 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2155 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Based on scripture.
2,164 posted on 08/22/2003 11:42:59 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2160 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
In all these posts though, I have not been shown where what I believe in my head regarding Darwin is some sort of a distortion.

Not quite. You still seem to believe there is something in evolution that claims there is a sharp demarkation wherein one individual of one species is born as another species. We've tried to disabuse you of this notion and show you that it is populations that change into new species, but I don't think we've managed to succeed, at least from the evidence of your posts.

2,165 posted on 08/22/2003 11:43:32 AM PDT by Junior (Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2153 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Part A, why assume that it was a "mammal part" that was put in the whale? Why not assume that it was a part with purpose (like an eyeball) that whales and mammals happen to share since the part was DESIGNED for a specific purpose?

Because a whale is a mammal and has mammalian parts.

Part B. The fossil record does not show this. ["Why also put fossils in the rocks that seem to show land animals slowly losing their legs and becoming whales?"] It is your interpretation that some land animal lost its legs and became a whale, but there is no proof (and don't use the alleged hip bones inside the whale as evidence as those bones are not vestigial even today but assist in a very important process for the whale- reproduction).

Really jaw-dropping. So either you know nothing at all of Pakicetus, Ambulocetus, Rhodocetus, Dorudon, Basilosaurus, or you only vaguely remember that there's an AiG naysaying article somewhere trying to dismiss it all on technicalities. Either way, ignorance of evidence is not absence of evidence.

Just because the designer did not design things the way the omniscient scientist would have liked for him to does not mean that it was a design flaw.

You can't infer much from the occasional appearance of design if nothing can be inferred from the absence of clear design intent.

Out for a while. I'll check back when I can, but I'm looking at a busy next few days.

2,166 posted on 08/22/2003 11:44:31 AM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2158 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Based on scripture.

I know, I know.

2,167 posted on 08/22/2003 11:46:09 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2164 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
We don't care if you only love we
We don't care if you only love we
We love you
We love you
And we hope that you will love we too
We love they
We love they
And we want you to love they too
2,168 posted on 08/22/2003 11:50:36 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2142 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Uh, perhaps rather than assuming I understood you wrong, maybe just maybe you need to communicate your thoughts better.

Your interpretation makes no sense against my words, nor does it make sense against the exchange I was having with MM, nor does it make sense in any other way. Still, if it was just one post, I'd call it a brain fart.

But it comes on top a thread-long performance in which one evo poster after another has had to correct your mischaracterizations. You've been at once relentless and tone-deaf.

Now I mean it, I'm gone for a bit.

2,169 posted on 08/22/2003 11:56:16 AM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2162 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
The answer is both biological and theological. Theological, we were created in God's image. No other animal was.

I agree with you there. Human beings are created in God's image. (As a Jew, I interpret that to mean spiritual image-- i.e., we have the ability to reason and to choose between good and evil-- not physical image.) It is my understanding, however, that God bestowed this gift on us through the process of evolution.

Biological, there may be similarities in appearance and even DNA (as I pointed out earlier, we share a lot of our DNA with a cabbage but aren't decended from them), but we can not breed with them nor is there any evidence that we ever did breed with them or a shared ancestor.

DNA similarities show common descent; the closer the similarity, the more recent the common ancestor. If you can disprove this, a lot of men being sued for child support will want to hire you.

There is really no evidence of a shared ancestor (bones don't show that they had ANY offspring period, just that they died), just a bunch of skulls (and skull portions) that scientists say this one is ape, this one is less ape, this one appears to be taking on the shape of being a little more human, etc.,

People (and apes) don't just magically appear; they are born from parents. As we go further back in time, we find the bones of human beings becoming progressively less upright; we find their brains becoming progressively smaller; and we find their teeth becoming progressively more ape-like.

I don't know precisely at what point on the evolutionary scale our ancestors became endowed with the Divine image and acquired an immortal soul; I don't think the bones will ever tell us that. (They do give us some hints, though-- at a certain point in the fossil record, the hominid bones start to show signs of deliberate burial.) Some things religion can answer and science can't; other things, religion can't answer and science can.

2,170 posted on 08/22/2003 11:59:27 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2159 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Usually such hypothetical images are compensation for poor data. For instance.


2,171 posted on 08/22/2003 12:08:22 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2163 | View Replies]

To: Junior
No I don't.
2,172 posted on 08/22/2003 12:10:08 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2165 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Part A, why assume that it was a "mammal part" that was put in the whale? Why not assume that it was a part with purpose (like an eyeball) that whales and mammals happen to share since the part was DESIGNED for a specific purpose?

Because a whale is a mammal and has mammalian parts.

I knew that. Wasn't thinking. My original point stands though. You assume that the whales parts are somehow not what they were designed to be.

occasional appearance of design if nothing can be inferred from the absence of clear design intent.
OCCASIONAL APPEARANCE OF DESIGN??????? Puhlease! Everything appears designed in some way shape or form. The way the tides work, our distance from the sun, the intricate details in even the simplest of cells. That appears to you as something that happened by CHANCE???????? Give me a break!
2,173 posted on 08/22/2003 12:15:03 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2166 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
I agree with you there. Human beings are created in God's image. (As a Jew, I interpret that to mean spiritual image-- i.e., we have the ability to reason and to choose between good and evil-- not physical image.) It is my understanding, however, that God bestowed this gift on us through the process of evolution.

How so? How can one evolve a spiritual image?

DNA similarities show common descent; the closer the similarity, the more recent the common ancestor. If you can disprove this, a lot of men being sued for child support will want to hire you.
To a point, this is correct. Just as to a point what is called "evolution" is correct (I'm talking Micro-evolution here).

There is really no evidence of a shared ancestor (bones don't show that they had ANY offspring period, just that they died), just a bunch of skulls (and skull portions) that scientists say this one is ape, this one is less ape, this one appears to be taking on the shape of being a little more human, etc.,
People (and apes) don't just magically appear; they are born from parents. As we go further back in time, we find the bones of human beings becoming progressively less upright; we find their brains becoming progressively smaller; and we find their teeth becoming progressively more ape-like.

An interpretation by those looking for missing links. Some of those skulls are true apes. Some are true humans. And some are apes or humans with deformities. And some are just scraps of skull that an evolutionary artist has filled in with an artist's conception of what the skull may have looked like (sometimes even including from the skull what the body looked like and what posture it was in).

I don't know precisely at what point on the evolutionary scale our ancestors became endowed with the Divine image and acquired an immortal soul; I don't think the bones will ever tell us that. (They do give us some hints, though-- at a certain point in the fossil record, the hominid bones start to show signs of deliberate burial.) Some things religion can answer and science can't; other things, religion can't answer and science can.
What about when religion gives one answer- clearly- and science disagrees? Ultimately, it is an issue of final authority.
2,174 posted on 08/22/2003 12:21:17 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2170 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
What about when religion gives one answer- clearly- and science disagrees? Ultimately, it is an issue of final authority.

Yes! That is precisely the issue! I assume you agree that the answers of science are just fine -- but only scientifically. So at that point it's a question of your personal ranking of information.

2,175 posted on 08/22/2003 12:34:30 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2174 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2

Not quite. You still seem to believe there is something in evolution that claims there is a sharp demarkation wherein one individual of one species is born as another species. We've tried to disabuse you of this notion and show you that it is populations that change into new species, but I don't think we've managed to succeed, at least from the evidence of your posts.

No I don't.

I'm sorry, I must have misunderstood your post 2021:

#2021: New Dinosaur Species Found in India ^
To: VadeRetro

Evos say that apes and we share a common ancestor? True or false? Through mutations over time man evolved upward from ape-like to man. At some point a radical enough change occurred that he was fully man (unless you just consider all men part apes). He had to have a mate. Unless a suitable female evolved exactly the same way he did, she still had part ape in her. If she did evolve exactly the way he did, why? Each person's genetics are different. A child can inherit a parent's gene, but to have a husband and wife arriving at that same point of fully human at the exact same time seems a little odd. Of course, having an ape turn, over time and mutation, into a higher form of species, namely man, is a bit odd too.

2,021 posted on 08/21/2003 8:33 PM CDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1953 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Bold mine for emphasis.  I'm not quite sure how we evos were to take the above except as illustrative of my contentions.

2,176 posted on 08/22/2003 12:34:50 PM PDT by Junior (Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2172 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
I suspect my views are close to the Jewish view, please let me know if that is so:

The Author of the Pentateuch is God, though a human acted as scribe. IOW, Genesis 1 was written by the only observer – God, so we ought to view the timescale (spacetime coordinate) of Creation from His perspective at inception rather than ours looking back on it. It works out rather handily that 6/7 equivalent days from the inception space/time coordinates equals 15 billion years from our space time coordinates. (approximately using the inflationary model and relativity)

I see the firmament as the separation between the physical and the spiritual realms - not a geometric boundary in space/time.

Additionally, because Genesis begins by saying He created heaven and earth (and because of Christian passages which you would not embrace) --- we ought to view Genesis 1 as speaking to the creation of ”all that there is” and not just the physical realm.

As with the Temple and the Ark, things which happen in the physical realm are a model of the real thing which exists in eternity. I see the Garden of Eden in the same light – the real Garden is paradise.

Therefore, Genesis 2 and 3 speak of events which are concurrently transpiring in eternity – culminating with Adam and Eve being banished to mortality. That's when I see Adamic man entering the physical realm in the form of a human being. That constitutes the Fall, when death entered the physical realm, i.e. spiritual Adamic man must now die. What made the difference between Adamic man and all the other men who were on earth was the neshama – the breath of God.

At that point the narrative of Genesis, the aspect changes to Adamic man and therefore, time passing becomes relative to our space/time coordinates. About 6000 years have transpired on Adam’s clock.

If we follow the archeological evidence – man’s desire to achieve immortality, the use of tools, personal adornment, community living, commerce, weapons, star gazing, household "gods", "super" men and the ilk – all commence and flow along the Adamic man timeline and geography.

And at about 2350 b.c. (which matches approximately the time of Noah) - virtually every center of such “civilization” in the entire world was wiped out by a catastrophic event. Some attribute this to cosmic debris, some to earthquakes – but it is characterized by massive flooding and destruction, even changing fertile ground to desert.

One final point. God is Truth whereas science yields facts. There are fewer than 40 sentences (as I recall) describing the Creation week and hundreds of thousands of scientific articles on the subject of cosmology and evolution. When I see something that appears to be inconsistent between them, my assumption is that I do not have a complete understanding, so I look for the answer – and I have always found it, to my satisfaction.

2,177 posted on 08/22/2003 1:05:24 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2170 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
That one is hysterical, LOL. I like the furry one best.
2,178 posted on 08/22/2003 1:05:53 PM PDT by goodseedhomeschool (returned) (If history has shown us anything, labeling ignorance science, proves scripture correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2171 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Black men all over the world should be angered by that one. It does seem very racial to me.
2,179 posted on 08/22/2003 1:08:07 PM PDT by goodseedhomeschool (returned) (If history has shown us anything, labeling ignorance science, proves scripture correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2163 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
By the way, why is it that the earliest fully formed humans are usually dark skinned?

What is the evidence for this?

2,180 posted on 08/22/2003 1:18:55 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2163 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,141-2,1602,161-2,1802,181-2,200 ... 3,121-3,129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson