Posted on 08/13/2003 9:28:12 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
|
The new chips would be about 500 atoms across, said Phillip Matz, a TI researcher working on the project. By comparison, a human hair is about 100,000 atoms across. The goal is smaller, more powerful chips. Most of the grant money will go to support the graduate students who will work on the project. The grant is part of a nationwide push to help scientists deliver on the promise of nanotechnology, an emerging discipline geared toward making smaller and smaller devices. Computer chips have continuously gotten smaller since they were invented. Consumers win because they get machines that are smaller, smarter and cheaper. But if that type of innovation ceases, the economic fortunes of the companies involved stagnate, Reidy said. To keep the economic engines revving, UNT and TI researchers are working on a problem that is blocking efforts to make chips even smaller: a kind of electron interference called cross-talk. It's caused when electrons are uncontrolled. The researchers will try to get electrons to travel down copper wire in an orderly way. "If you want electrons to do something useful, you have to direct them," said Dennis Mueller, a UNT physics professor. Reidy said: "What you have is a bleed-through of electricity. As you get the wires closer together, the problems are worse, so the insulation has to keep getting better and better." This is a recurring problem in nano research. The devices have gotten so small that scientists have to figure out ways to handle problems caused by their size. "When you get down to that level, things stick when they should be slipping, and slip when they should be sticking," said Wade Adams, a nanotech expert at Rice University in Houston. Sometimes, the components are so small that they just float away, Adams said. "You can't just put an atom somewhere and expect it to stay there," Adams said. Finding a tool to handle something several molecules in size without damaging it can be difficult. Even with the right tool, some molecules will stick to the tool. The process can be so frustrating that some researchers contend that using mechanical tools is a waste of time. "You cannot use any mechanical force to manipulate molecules," said J.C. Chiao, associate professor of electrical engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington. "You use a laser tweezer. That uses optical force to manipulate molecules." Others disagree. "Clearly people are doing it," Mueller said, describing an early demonstration in which scientists at IBM used mechanical tools to drag xenon atoms that spelled out the company logo. Nanotechnology was first popularized by science fiction writers. In the movie Fantastic Voyage, a miniature submarine injected into a man propelled itself through his bloodstream. Chiao said he does not expect anything so extraordinary to come out of nanotechnology research anytime soon. "We will see gradual improvements or enhancements in our daily lives, but not anything dramatic," Chiao said. "Before we actually have the sci-fi machines, a lot of things will have to happen along the way. I would say that robots that will be able to clean away the plaque from your bloodstream will not be available anytime soon." The technology has shown promise. Smaller components can mean smarter machines. If you double the electronics that make your laptop computer useful, and it still fits in the same 10-pound package, the result is a more powerful computer, Chiao said. That smarter computer would also use less energy than the older model, because the smaller the components, the less energy they need, Chiao said. Some researchers envision a day when complex devices might even be powered by body heat or solar energy. Nanotechnology is a globally competitive endeavor that is attracting billions of dollars in investment. The United States is planning to spend about $800 million on nanotechnology research next year, but Japan is spending about $1 billion this year, said James Von Ehr, chief executive officer and founder of Zyvez. Texas is listed No. 5 in the nanotechnology business among states, but the state is at the bottom of the list in investment, said Von Ehr, who is also president of the Texas Nanotech Initiative, a consortium of universities and businesses promoting the industry. "We are in a position to be among the leaders in the technology, but we will not stay there indefinitely," Von Ehr said. "This is a very aggressive field right now, and staying in the top five will be very difficult if we don't continue to invest. It may be that we decide that the future is somewhere else. But I'll be very disappointed if that happens." |
Why did they pick that #? They see Clinton's genitals?
If the chips which are currently in use are 1000 atoms across, I'm impressed. Don't these writers have editors?
Mind you, the REAL fun starts when we can make opto-mechanical computers with individual parts in the 4-20 atom range: depending on technology breaks, that's anywhere from 20 to 100 years off. . .
I've always hated that about those darned atoms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.