Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What makes a liberal?
Townhall.com ^ | August 12, 2003 | Dennis Prager

Posted on 08/12/2003 7:16:34 AM PDT by Mudcat

Why do people hold liberal-left positions? (Liberal and left were once very different, but not anymore.)

This question has plagued me because I have long believed that most people, liberal or conservative, mean well. Very few people wake up in the morning planning to harm society. Yet, many liberal positions -- I emphasize liberal positions rather than liberals because most people who call themselves liberal do not hold most contemporary liberal positions -- have been wreaking havoc on America and the world.

How, then, can decent and often very smart people hold liberal positions?

There are many reasons, but the two greatest may be naivete and narcissism. Each alone causes problems, but when combined in the same person, they are particularly destructive.

At the heart of liberalism is the naive belief that people are basically good. As a result of this belief, liberals rarely blame people for the evil they do. Instead, they blame economics, parents, capitalism, racism, and anything else that can let the individual off the hook.

A second naive liberal belief is that because people are basically good, talking with people who do evil is always better than fighting, let alone killing, them. "Negotiate with Saddam," "Negotiate with the Soviets," "War never solves anything," "Think peace," "Visualize peace" -- the liberal mind is filled with naive cliches about how to deal with evil.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: dennisprager; left; liberal; liberalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Mudcat
Dennis Prager lays it out very well.
21 posted on 08/12/2003 8:34:19 AM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VoiceOfBruck
"The one common theme in the personalities of liberals in my acquaintance is fear at various levels (social, economic, safety, health, etc.)."

On the contrary -- I nominate that the one common theme is smugness, arrogance, self-righteousness, and an annoying belief that the state is superior to the individual.

Please explain what you mean by fear because I have yet to meet a liberal that is fundamentally afraid.

22 posted on 08/12/2003 8:54:45 AM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mudcat
Excellent. Prager has nailed it.

When I argue with liberals, I always feel like I'm arguing with a child, or a loon.

They either get totally sidetracked by "how it FEELS", not facts, or have such a nonsensical reasoning system I feel like I am in the twilite zone. "Yes, but what is the DIFFERENCE between the African religions and Christianity? Aren't they valid also?"
Arghhhhhh!
23 posted on 08/12/2003 8:57:21 AM PDT by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tom h
Smugness, arrogance, self-righteousness all are the result of weakness. These are small people who have no life. The belief that the state is superior is comfortable for these type of people. They like being taken care of and want to avoid personal responsibily at all costs.

24 posted on 08/12/2003 9:02:33 AM PDT by rrr51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mudcat
One of the great liberal icons, Sigmund Freud, based his entire philosophy on the belief that man is born "sick" and must be "cured" (not unlike the Church's teaching regarding Original Sin). This part of his philosophy was discredited by the psychological community back in the '80s with the rise of Carl Rogers' I'm-OK-You're-OK "unconditional positive regard" theory.

The unconditional love BS was the first liberal foray into the cult of self-esteem. Dr. Rogers has since repudiated his earlier work, stating that endless support of a child's ego (unconditional positive regard) causes children to have no conscience or empathy.

I'm not sure what unconditional positive regard is being replaced with, but I'm hoping its a big stick.

25 posted on 08/12/2003 9:08:30 AM PDT by reformed_democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudcat
First mistake:

"... I have long believed that most people, liberal or conservative, mean well."

Liberals quit being "people who mean well" when they granted Clinton one free grope, dropped principles of protecting the powerless (slammed Paula) and used lies and intimidation to further morally bankrupt causes.

Second mistake:

At the heart of liberalism is the naive belief that people are basically good.

Wrong. Liberals new belief is "corrupt people are a special interest group that votes". They court those who prey upon the hard working and decent. It's not your Daddy's Democrat Party.

26 posted on 08/12/2003 9:14:00 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudcat; All
First mistake:

"... I have long believed that most people, liberal or conservative, mean well."

Liberals quit being "people who mean well" when they granted Clinton one free grope, dropped principles of protecting the powerless (slammed Paula) and used lies and intimidation to further morally bankrupt causes.

Second mistake:

At the heart of liberalism is the naive belief that people are basically good.

Wrong. Liberals new belief is "corrupt people are a special interest group that votes". They court those who prey upon the hard working and decent. It's not your Daddy's Democrat Party.

27 posted on 08/12/2003 9:14:42 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudcat
Read this, my post on the Left:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/958685/posts
28 posted on 08/12/2003 9:20:05 AM PDT by Imagine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudcat
bump
29 posted on 08/12/2003 9:48:29 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudcat
At the heart of liberalism is the naive belief that people are basically good.

Disagree - it has nothing to do with "good" - liberals think eveyone not liberal is a hopeless, helpless failure, or devastatingly dangerous, and must be helped or controlled by big, intrusive, liberal, anti-constitutional gov't.

While it is true that liberals think nobody is accountable for any evil they might perpetrate on civilization, it is based on the idiotic premise that a real enemy could not possibly exist. To liberals, this means that there must be some other reason than the perpetrator might actually hate someone and actually want to cause harm, death, meyhem, etc.!

There is an upside to this - liberals, when attacked by infidel-hating muslims will, as the softest targets, be the first to die, and while the enemy is killing them, it'll warn the rest of us, giving us a better chance to take defensive measures! Then, since they are so full of manure, their carcasses can be used for compost to fertilize fields and gardens.......

30 posted on 08/12/2003 9:52:57 AM PDT by mil-vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tom h
On the contrary -- I nominate that the one common theme is smugness, arrogance, self-righteousness, and an annoying belief that the state is superior to the individual.

Please explain what you mean by fear because I have yet to meet a liberal that is fundamentally afraid.

There's no contradiction between your observations (with which I concur) and my belief that fear underlies liberalism. They might do a good job of hiding that fear, but I still think it's there.

What I'm talking about is a basic lack of self-confidence and distrust of others. Examples: fear of failure - make a huge government with all kinds of social and wealth-distribution programs, fix prices on labor (unions, minimum wage); fear of crime - gun control & other behavior modification; fear of rejection - be "politically correct," don't ever judge or condemn objectionable behavior, etc.

Another thread I've observed in liberals is the need to control, both people and surroundings. But again I think this is fundamentally based in fear.

Okay, now, here's another question for all to chew on:

What Makes a Conservative?

31 posted on 08/12/2003 10:10:11 AM PDT by VoiceOfBruck (please disregard what i just said. i didn't mean it. what i meant to say was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: VoiceOfBruck
Someone smacks a liberal upside the head and knocks the neurons back in place?
32 posted on 08/12/2003 10:27:00 AM PDT by reformed_democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: reformed_democrat
The one I've heard is, when does a liberal become a conservative? When he get mugged.
33 posted on 08/12/2003 10:35:45 AM PDT by VoiceOfBruck (please disregard what i just said. i didn't mean it. what i meant to say was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mudcat
In the movie "As Good as it Gets" Jack Nickelson was asked how to you write about women so well. Jack responded, "I take a man and take away reason and accountability..."

Sounds like a Good Liberal to me: "take a person and take away reason and accountability..." .....add a little Godlessness of course.
34 posted on 08/12/2003 10:43:18 AM PDT by TRY ONE (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudcat
Answer : Error
35 posted on 08/12/2003 10:44:10 AM PDT by PoorMuttly (A Muttly Bribed is a Muttly Earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudcat
Interesting question. My wife's mother is a very sweet lady, but she is also a liberal. (The Missus won't let me talk about politics with her). I've got to say that there has to be a lot of naivety in the mix. I hate to admit it, but I think there is also a certain level of arrogance involved.
36 posted on 08/12/2003 10:53:25 AM PDT by exile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
"... I have long believed that most people, liberal or conservative, mean well."

“Liberals quit being "people who mean well" when they granted Clinton one free grope, dropped principles of protecting the powerless (slammed Paula) and used lies and intimidation to further morally bankrupt causes. “

Think of a dog cowering in a cornor he will bit out of fear alone.

“At the heart of liberalism is the naive belief that people are basically good.

Wrong. Liberals new belief is "corrupt people are a special interest group that votes". They court those who prey upon the hard working and decent. It's not your Daddy's Democrat Party.”

Again this is an act of fear. Germans put people into the concentration camps because they feared them not because the individual did wrong. Once a group is feared they are on longer good people in the minds of a libreal.

37 posted on 08/12/2003 12:53:29 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
You're right:

Again this is an act of fear. Germans put people into the concentration camps because they feared them not because the individual did wrong. Once a group is feared they are on longer good people in the minds of a libreal.

38 posted on 08/12/2003 8:22:29 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson