Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Clinton's Beijing deal endangered America
Brookes News (Australia) ^ | Monday 11 August 2003 | Peter Zhang

Posted on 08/10/2003 7:04:41 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln

How Clinton's Beijing deal endangered America

Peter Zhang
BrookesNews.Com
Monday 11 August 2003

Seeing as so many democrats and their allies in the media have been screaming about intelligence failures and the President Bush's foreign policy, I think it's time to once again turn to the Clinton administration and its dangerous dealings with Beijing.

I completely confess to being fascinated by Clinton's Chinese spying scandal. It's like a form of mental super glue — I just don't seem to be able to let go. That he was able to get away with it is still a source of amazement to me, and others acquainted with his Chinese dealings.

So what did Beijing get from the Clintons? I think the answer is obvious. Clinton gave Beijing a free reign and a guarantee that its activities would not be interrupted during, what he quaintly calls, his "watch" so that China could clear out America's military and high-tech secrets. Simple.

Questions regarding Clinton, particularly on this matter, only lead to more questions. How could Beijing be certain that Clinton, even as president of the United States, could make good such a guarantee? One, I think, should start with his governorship of Arkansas. There seems little doubt that Clinton ran it as his personal fiefdom, replacing or shoving aside those who could prove troublesome.

Some would argue that this is the norm. That is probably true in American politics, but not to the corrupt and ruthless extent that Clinton practised it. His approach to power and people is truly Machiavellian. Given this fact, and his support in the media, it is not surprising that reports made out to Chinese intelligence suggested that Clinton would be favourably disposed to dealing with Chinese representatives — for a price.

Intelligence assessments were supported by Clinton's action, shortly after entering (or is it soiling?) the Oval Office, in asking all US Attorneys General to resign. This unprecedented and dictatorial move gave the Clinton administration control over the prosecutorial machinery of the federal government in every judicial district in the US. No need to tell you who was impressed by this breathtakingly brazen move.

Why Clinton even tried to appoint Webster Hubbel to the post of Attorney General. Imagine where that would have led. But what struck a particular chord was the way the American media acquiesced to the Clintons' manoeuvres. Beijing does not underrate the power of the Western media, especially in America. That the media, with the exception of a few lone voices, was prepared to collaborate with the Clintons gave further assurance to Beijing that Clinton was able to deliver.

But what of the CIA and the FBI, asked some readers? I have no wish to be patronising, but the naiveté of the American public is almost touching at times. It didn't even notice that William Sessions, FBI Director, a man noted for his integrity and opposition to political interference in the Bureau's affairs, was removed as quickly as Clinton moved into the Oval office.

There is no doubt that Clinton deliberately acted to chain the CIA and the National Security Agency as well as the FBI. One method was to have Clinton supporters in sensitive positions so that they could delay, if not derail, any budding investigations into Clinton's China operations. Many of these supporters are still in place and owe their loyalty to the Clinton political machine.

With these bodies virtually rendered ineffective by the Democrats Chinese intelligence had a field day. Now being ineffective does not mean uninformed. These agencies new very well what Chinese intelligence was up to but were largely powerless to do anything about it. After all, what could they do when the commander in chief, the president himself, had, by his actions, made it clear that investigations into China's spying activities would not be welcomed.

One of the reasons that Janet Reno was appointed to head the Justice Department was that the Clintons believed she could be relied on to sabotage any investigations into Chinese intelligence operations.

I should point out at this stage that several Chinese officials let it drop that they believed Clinton was blackmailing Reno over certain activities concerning her personal life. Whatever the truth of the matter, Reno's role as the last of Clinton's gatekeepers, so to speak, more than satisfied Beijing's expectations by thoroughly corrupting the Justice Department and blocking FBI requests.

No wonder Beijing was so satisfied with its part of the deal that if felt sufficiently in command to 'request' that Clinton see to it that John Huang be given top security clearance and placed in a favourable position, favourable to Chinese intelligence, that is.

Thus we find Huang being given a position in the Commerce Department, at the insistence of Clinton, where he was able to use his security clearance to directly obtain information from the CIA.

I was told that CIA officials were in no doubt about Huang's activities but were held in check by Clinton, despite CIA complaints. Does any reader honestly believe that Clinton is so innocent that he had no idea why Beijing wanted a security clearance for Huang?

So did Beijing really think it was going to get away with spying activities? Of course it did. And it has. Chinese intelligence expected eventual exposure but calculated that by the time it occurred the damage would be done. It was right. Clinton, not China, emptied the Candy store with devastating results for American security. The consequences will be felt for many years to come.

It's time Americans woke up to what the Clintons and the majority of congressional Democrats did to American security


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: beijing; china; clinton; clintonlegacy; clintonspying; scandal; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Lando Lincoln
the naiveté of the American public is almost touching at times

It is not possible to have free trade with countries that employ slave labor and have no regulatory, legal or lobby expense.

Clinton helped a criminal regime and military enemy start trade with the U.S.

Send AFL/CIO lawyers to China.

61 posted on 08/11/2003 6:17:58 AM PDT by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln; JohnHuang2; kattracks; Travis McGee; Alamo-Girl; ALOHA RONNIE; maui_hawaii; ...
Ping if you already haven't been!
62 posted on 08/11/2003 6:32:48 AM PDT by Paul Ross (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!-A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
What was the story behind Sessions dismissal? Sessions was dismissed the day before Vince Foster was found murdered.

Wasn't he hustled out under guard?

63 posted on 08/11/2003 7:01:36 AM PDT by Mr. Peabody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover; ALOHA RONNIE
HILLARY RODHAM then ran for the U.S. Senate and is now running for President of the United States with the same $$$ backing she had during the 1990's.

And so we now have had Gore last year make a secret trip, not to the temples, but to China itself at the very moment when he sought financing for his emerging campaign. Three weeks after returning from China Gore dropped out of the campaign, but no one ever acknowleged the connection to the China trip being related.

Obviously (at least to me), Hillary had already laid claim to the ChiCom money for the next election and Gore was totally shut out, empty handed after returning to the same trough he suceeded at before.

The illegal foreign ChiCom money still flows unimpeded today, campaign finance reform or other superficial political band-aids notwithstanding.

Stay tuned for just how Hillary will spend her ChiCom funds.

64 posted on 08/11/2003 7:02:37 AM PDT by flamefront (To the victor go the oils. No oil or oil-money for islamofascist weapons of mass annihilation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
Bump!!
65 posted on 08/11/2003 7:11:27 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: flamefront; Joy Angela; conservogirl; Ragtime Cowgirl; Alamo-Girl; SMEDLEYBUTLER; Boston; VOA; ...
1997 =

BOXER, FEINSTEIN & LORETTA SANCHEZ told us they received $1,000's in China Army Money during their 1996 Compaigns and were going to return it.

China Army Money Givers JAMES RIADY and JOHNNY CHUNG both confirm...

...that that China Army Money was ever returned to them.
66 posted on 08/11/2003 7:17:50 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Thanks for posting this. I have sent it to my lefty cousin in CA. I think I have made some inroads in his warped liberal thinking. He did not oppose the war & even convinced a few of his friends to do the same. Thats not to say that he is not screaming for Bush's head now like the rest of them.
67 posted on 08/11/2003 7:34:46 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
bttt
68 posted on 08/11/2003 8:18:07 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
Thanks for the heads up!
69 posted on 08/11/2003 8:49:48 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln; PeaceBeWithYou; Budge; teeman8r; viaveritasvita; Travelgirl; wirestripper; ...
Excellent post. Of course it will not likely see the light of day in any significant way.

Ping!

70 posted on 08/11/2003 9:46:13 AM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: Lando Lincoln
Read later
72 posted on 08/11/2003 9:58:29 AM PDT by swany
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: underbyte
Report that Commerce Dept. official to the FBI, pronto. Tell them everything. And then send everything in your FBI report to Bill Gertz at the Washington Times to light a few fires in the appropriate tushes. Do not be fobbed off with the 'under investigation' reason to stay quiet. It has been how many YEARS since this went down??? The 'Move-On' gang will try and pretend they have no duty to do anything about it.
73 posted on 08/11/2003 11:38:51 AM PDT by Paul Ross (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!-A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Peabody
Wasn't he hustled out under guard?

Who, Sessions or Foster? Seriously... ?

74 posted on 08/11/2003 1:12:11 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Remember Loral Corp. and the clinton waivers allowing
advanced weapons technology to be sold to China!
Clinton is a Marxist!

Ops4 God Bless America
75 posted on 08/11/2003 1:14:32 PM PDT by OPS4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
It has been six or seven years and I could not name the guy if I had to, it is not going anywhere.

in any event my point was I am pretty far out of the loop, yet I can sight a couple indications that things may not have been right with national security.

Being far removed from what was going on and for me to be aware of it says that it was probably widespread and aggressive. And if it was that blatent Gertz or anybody else should be able to put together a report with better sources than myself in short order and I would not be surprised if they already know more than they say.

76 posted on 08/11/2003 1:14:49 PM PDT by underbyte (Arrogance will drop your IQ 50 points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: marron
(Director Of Central Intelligence) William Sessions was dismissed the day before Vince Foster was found murdered

And NOTHING will ever ever change that fact!That's just one more interesting action by Billy Jeff Blythe.How entirely convenient,hmmm?

77 posted on 08/11/2003 2:35:34 PM PDT by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is a Smug, Holier - Than - Thou Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
The media seems to have had an embargo on this for a long time and doesn't look like they will ever get out of the protect Clintons at all cost mode!
78 posted on 08/11/2003 3:14:34 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (VOTE FOR ARNOLD -- GOP's Best Chance to Tank Hillary for 2004 and beyond!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Thanks for the flag! Peter Zhang is one of my favorit writers. Do you know anything about him?
79 posted on 08/11/2003 4:38:16 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
You know .. it's weird, but today Rush went on and on about how the Clintons have done so much damager to the dims and yet the dims still continue to hang on to them.

Rush went into detail about x42 losing the House and Senate, plus the WH, and about 2/3 of the people he campaigned for in 2002.

Little by little - stuff is beginning to leak out.

And .. I think a lot of dims (who were mortified by the Clintons' actions), are beginning to realize Hillary may be able to get back into the WH - and I have a feeling there are people within the party WHO DO NOT WANT THAT TO HAPPEN.
80 posted on 08/11/2003 5:26:13 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson