Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This is not your father's (Episcopal) Church anymore (Cal Thomas weighs in on "gay" bishop)
Modesto Bee ^ | Aug 6 03 | Cal Thomas

Posted on 08/06/2003 9:56:33 PM PDT by churchillbuff

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:56:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

An Episcopalian friend of mine, reacting to the elevation of an openly homosexual priest to the office of bishop, said to me, "If you're a heterosexual clergyman and you're having sex outside marriage, you can be expelled. But if you're a homosexual clergyman having sex outside marriage, they rejoice." Most denominations that call themselves Christian take the Bible as their text for spiritual and relational instruction. Some in the Episcopal Church take a liberal view of the Bible, just as some do of the U.S. Constitution - it must be constantly updated to suit cultural trends. This view lends itself to constant misinterpretation and confusion. Eventually, it leads to religious or political heresy.


(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: calthomas; episcopal; fallout; generobinson; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexualbishop; queer; schism; unqualified
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: dyed_in_the_wool
Paul was a member of the Sanhedrin which required marriage. At some point he ceased to be married, but he then preached celibacy as preferable, and marriage for those who would not(and yes, I mean the word "would", as opposed to "could")not remain celibate. His thorn in the flesh was clearly his eyesight, which was damaged during his encounter with Christ. This "Paul was gay" lie is just another of the false teachings the homosexual community is touting in a frantic effort to justify their sin. They have not and will not change God's mind, and neither will you.
41 posted on 08/07/2003 6:14:07 AM PDT by Wiser now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
Jane Austen? Are they out of their minds? Like she could get away with that in her culture?

Quick antidote here -- I'm a big Jane Austen fan:

Jane went to Paradise:
That was only fair.
Good Sir Walter followed her,
And armed her up the stair.
Henry and Tobias,
And Miguel of Spain,
Stood with Shakespeare at the top
To welcome Jane--

Then the Three Archangels
Offered out of hand
Anything in Heaven's gift
That she might command.
Azrael's eyes upon her,
Raphael's wings above,
Michael's sword against her heart,
Jane said: "Love."

Instantly the under-
Standing Seraphim
Laid their fingers on their lips
And went to look for him.
Stole across the Zodiac,
Harnessed Charles's Wain,
And whispered round the Nebulae
"Who loved Jane?"

In a private limbo
Where none had thought to look,
Sat a Hampshire gentleman
Reading of a book.
It was called Persuasion
And it told the plain
Story of the love between
Him and Jane.

He heard the question,
Circle Heaven through--
Closed the book and answered:
"I did -- and do!"
Quietly but speedily
(As Captain Wentworth moved)
Entered into Paradise
The man Jane loved!

Jane lies in Winchester, blessed be her shade!
Praise the Lord for making her, and her for all she made.
And while the stones of Winchester--or Milson Street--remain,
Glory, Love, and Honour unto England's Jane!


42 posted on 08/07/2003 6:19:16 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
gotta give credit where credit's due . . .

- Rudyard Kipling, "Jane's Marriage".

He was a big Austen fan too. Have you ever read his short story "The Janeites"?

43 posted on 08/07/2003 6:20:14 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
No, but I'll look for it now, thanks.
44 posted on 08/07/2003 6:36:01 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: buzz23
Earl is that you?

45 posted on 08/07/2003 6:40:44 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
In what is regarded by most Christians as the job description for high church office, Paul the Apostle wrote to his young protege Timothy that an "overseer" (or minister) must be "above reproach, the husband of one wife," and "must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him with proper respect."

When using the original Greek, the translation in this passage from Timothy is more correctly "elder" or "bishop", not "minister". The Greek word for minister is diakonos and is brought to English as "deacon", an entirely different office in the church from "elder". The Scriptural requirements for both offices require the incumbent to be male and properly lead his family in spiritual matters.

46 posted on 08/07/2003 6:47:10 AM PDT by T-Bird45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polemikos
"Anyone know Cal's religious affiliation?"

I found this:


47 posted on 08/07/2003 6:55:21 AM PDT by Artist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus; thegreatbeast; scripter
"Is there any question anymore that we are under a relentless assault to normalize perversity in the form of the gay agenda?"

"Not since posters like Bryan and EdReform put up big chunks of Marshall Kirk and "Erastes Pill"'s article "Overhauling Straight America" on FR, the gay-newsweekly article that, in Kirk's hands, eventually became After the Ball."


The homosexual community's infiltration of the church, in order to undermine and destroy its authority, has been part of a well planned and well funded campaign that has been going on for years.


An excerpt from: The Overhauling of Straight America:

"While public opinion is one primary source of mainstream values, religious authority is the other. When conservative churches condemn gays, there are only two things we can do to confound the homophobia of true believers. First, we can use talk to muddy the moral waters. This means publicizing support for gays by more moderate churches, raising theological objections of our own about conservative interpretations of biblical teachings, and exposing hatred and inconsistency. Second, we can undermine the moral authority of homophobic churches by portraying them as antiquated backwaters, badly out of step with the times and with the latest findings of psychology. Against the mighty pull of institutional Religion one must set the mightier draw of Science and Public Opinion (the shield and word of that accursed “secular humanism”). Such an unholy alliance has worked well against churches before, on such topics as divorce and abortion. With enough open talk about the prevalence and acceptability of homosexuality, that alliance can work again here..."


The homosexual community's focus will now shift to the destruction of marriage.


An excerpt from: In Their Own Words: The Homosexual Agenda:

"Homosexual activist Michelangelo Signorile, who writes periodically for The New York Times, summarizes the agenda in OUT magazine:

...to fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely, to demand the right to marry not as a way of adhering to society's moral codes, but rather to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution... The most subversive action lesbian and gay men can undertake --and one that would perhaps benefit all of society--is to transform the notion of family entirely." "Its the final tool with which to dismantle all sodomy statues, get education about homosexuality and AIDS into the public schools and in short to usher in a sea change in how society views and treats us."



An excerpt from: Homosexual Priests: A Time for Truth:

"The homosexual movement has a history of trying to claw its way into places its agenda doesn’t belong, not for the betterment of mankind, but simply to legitimize and normalize perverse behavior. This is apparent in the all-too-common need of homosexuals to declare their sexuality rather than simply do the job they sign on to do.

This is extremely detrimental - first, it creates conflict with others as most believe homosexuality to be wrong, and it shows that the full efforts of the employed homosexual are not going towards performing the task at hand but largely to declaring their lifestyle. When it comes to serious concerns such as the Church, schools, and the Boy Scouts that involve our children, we can’t take the risk of giving them this power to destroy the values we as parents try to instill, nor can we put our country’s welfare at stake by turning these pivotal foundational institutions and our military into homosexual social experiments.

The homosexual movement is marked by two major tendencies: the tendency to continually infiltrate all good aspects of society; and once they have achieved that, the tendency to destroy this good. Public education, the Boy Scouts, the military, and now the Catholic Church have been targeted, and all have been hurt by the effects of homosexuality. The media and the Church must break its silence towards this enemy. If they do not, the people themselves must rise up and expose it..."


Quotes from "After the Ball" can be found here:

The Homosexual Propaganda and Media Manipulation Game

What Homosexuals Say About Homosexuals - Is This Gay Behavior Sick?

48 posted on 08/07/2003 7:40:13 AM PDT by EdReform (www.choice4truth.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: buzz23
Homosexuals ARE allowed to marry, you dimwit.

Show me the law that says a homosexual male cannot marry any willing, single female.

It would be absolutely impossible for two men to "marry" each other, because the very essence, definition of marriage is b/w man and woman.
49 posted on 08/07/2003 7:54:07 AM PDT by Guillermo (Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
You forgot David and Jonathan.

They were gay, of course, because they were best friends.

You are right: The homofascists try to re-write truth by saying he or she was homosexual, just so they can justify their own behavior (they KNOW it's immoral) to themselves.
50 posted on 08/07/2003 7:56:46 AM PDT by Guillermo (Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
You are right: The homofascists try to re-write truth by saying he or she was homosexual, just so they can justify their own behavior (they KNOW it's immoral) to themselves

They were already doing this 40 years ago. When I was in high school, the speech teacher risked his job to put out the homosexual propaganda in class that Jesus and John the Evangelist were a gay couple. I heard this second-hand, since I wasn't in that class, but this is typical, not unusual. The urge to attack and upset moral heterosexuals has always been strong. It's the recrimination of the out-group: criminal, homosexual, dissident. They always have to make you the issue and will always lash out.

51 posted on 08/07/2003 8:17:33 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Usquequo, Domine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: pbear8
Good answer. They will bow their knee to no one--yet! When they do it will be too late for every knee shall bow when they see Jesus.
52 posted on 08/07/2003 8:32:27 AM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke
Thanks, Gopher. That's a good statement. I hope the Episcopal members who disagree with this vote will break away and join other churches, perhaps the Anglicans if they wish. I know the people in Africa are horrified at this decision, as we all should be.
53 posted on 08/07/2003 8:36:27 AM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
why don't they abandon a church that has clearly abandoned Him?

Because... Our Church is not really a top-down organization. It is more of a loose confederation of Dioceses and Parishes that may go their separate ways.

I still like my parish. I'm not ready to leave. If I become disillusioned with my parish, for example if we start electing openly gay men to the vestry, I will probably leave. If I leave, I will probably not seek another Episcopal church to be my church home. I will probably get flamed for this but it is my thinking at this time.
54 posted on 08/07/2003 8:40:07 AM PDT by johnb838 (What about sensitivity to MY culture?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
I’m too devastated to comment. I’ve been an Episcopalian all my life and I simply don’t know what to do. There is a website called The American Anglican Council which has my interests in mind. The trouble is we don’t want to leave the church, we love our rector and the church itself but we no longer can be part of a religion that won’t abide by God’s word. Schism is the only solution at this point.
55 posted on 08/07/2003 11:34:41 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
I don't think there's going to be any schism.

I'm worried about that too. I'm too sad to even think about it.

56 posted on 08/07/2003 11:36:36 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush; lentulusgracchus
Here's antother web site you might be interested in.

A Place To Stand

57 posted on 08/07/2003 11:39:36 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff; EdReform; *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; ...
Does their denomination represent the will of their God and, if not, why don't they abandon a church that has clearly abandoned Him?

Thanks for the ping. Excellent question. Our small-town newspaper had a front page article on this, and how most of the locals are very upset with the direction their church has taken.

Homosexual Agenda Index
Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search
All FreeRepublic Bump Lists

A simple freepmail is all it takes to subscribe or unsubscribe from my homosexual agenda ping list.

58 posted on 08/07/2003 12:01:52 PM PDT by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
I’ve been an Episcopalian all my life and I simply don’t know what to do.

That's gotta be tough. I'll send some help in the form of prayer.

59 posted on 08/07/2003 12:03:18 PM PDT by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: jnarcus
Cal Thomas is a Baptist, and a Southern Baptist, I'm pretty sure.
60 posted on 08/07/2003 12:06:51 PM PDT by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson