Posted on 08/06/2003 9:56:33 PM PDT by churchillbuff
Edited on 04/13/2004 1:56:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Quick antidote here -- I'm a big Jane Austen fan:
Jane went to Paradise:
That was only fair.
Good Sir Walter followed her,
And armed her up the stair.
Henry and Tobias,
And Miguel of Spain,
Stood with Shakespeare at the top
To welcome Jane--Then the Three Archangels
Offered out of hand
Anything in Heaven's gift
That she might command.
Azrael's eyes upon her,
Raphael's wings above,
Michael's sword against her heart,
Jane said: "Love."Instantly the under-
Standing Seraphim
Laid their fingers on their lips
And went to look for him.
Stole across the Zodiac,
Harnessed Charles's Wain,
And whispered round the Nebulae
"Who loved Jane?"In a private limbo
Where none had thought to look,
Sat a Hampshire gentleman
Reading of a book.
It was called Persuasion
And it told the plain
Story of the love between
Him and Jane.He heard the question,
Circle Heaven through--
Closed the book and answered:
"I did -- and do!"
Quietly but speedily
(As Captain Wentworth moved)
Entered into Paradise
The man Jane loved!Jane lies in Winchester, blessed be her shade!
Praise the Lord for making her, and her for all she made.
And while the stones of Winchester--or Milson Street--remain,
Glory, Love, and Honour unto England's Jane!
- Rudyard Kipling, "Jane's Marriage".
He was a big Austen fan too. Have you ever read his short story "The Janeites"?
When using the original Greek, the translation in this passage from Timothy is more correctly "elder" or "bishop", not "minister". The Greek word for minister is diakonos and is brought to English as "deacon", an entirely different office in the church from "elder". The Scriptural requirements for both offices require the incumbent to be male and properly lead his family in spiritual matters.
I found this:
"Not since posters like Bryan and EdReform put up big chunks of Marshall Kirk and "Erastes Pill"'s article "Overhauling Straight America" on FR, the gay-newsweekly article that, in Kirk's hands, eventually became After the Ball."
The homosexual community's infiltration of the church, in order to undermine and destroy its authority, has been part of a well planned and well funded campaign that has been going on for years.
An excerpt from: The Overhauling of Straight America:
"While public opinion is one primary source of mainstream values, religious authority is the other. When conservative churches condemn gays, there are only two things we can do to confound the homophobia of true believers. First, we can use talk to muddy the moral waters. This means publicizing support for gays by more moderate churches, raising theological objections of our own about conservative interpretations of biblical teachings, and exposing hatred and inconsistency. Second, we can undermine the moral authority of homophobic churches by portraying them as antiquated backwaters, badly out of step with the times and with the latest findings of psychology. Against the mighty pull of institutional Religion one must set the mightier draw of Science and Public Opinion (the shield and word of that accursed secular humanism). Such an unholy alliance has worked well against churches before, on such topics as divorce and abortion. With enough open talk about the prevalence and acceptability of homosexuality, that alliance can work again here..."
The homosexual community's focus will now shift to the destruction of marriage.
An excerpt from: In Their Own Words: The Homosexual Agenda:
"Homosexual activist Michelangelo Signorile, who writes periodically for The New York Times, summarizes the agenda in OUT magazine:
...to fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely, to demand the right to marry not as a way of adhering to society's moral codes, but rather to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution... The most subversive action lesbian and gay men can undertake --and one that would perhaps benefit all of society--is to transform the notion of family entirely." "Its the final tool with which to dismantle all sodomy statues, get education about homosexuality and AIDS into the public schools and in short to usher in a sea change in how society views and treats us."
An excerpt from: Homosexual Priests: A Time for Truth:
"The homosexual movement has a history of trying to claw its way into places its agenda doesnt belong, not for the betterment of mankind, but simply to legitimize and normalize perverse behavior. This is apparent in the all-too-common need of homosexuals to declare their sexuality rather than simply do the job they sign on to do.
This is extremely detrimental - first, it creates conflict with others as most believe homosexuality to be wrong, and it shows that the full efforts of the employed homosexual are not going towards performing the task at hand but largely to declaring their lifestyle. When it comes to serious concerns such as the Church, schools, and the Boy Scouts that involve our children, we cant take the risk of giving them this power to destroy the values we as parents try to instill, nor can we put our countrys welfare at stake by turning these pivotal foundational institutions and our military into homosexual social experiments.
The homosexual movement is marked by two major tendencies: the tendency to continually infiltrate all good aspects of society; and once they have achieved that, the tendency to destroy this good. Public education, the Boy Scouts, the military, and now the Catholic Church have been targeted, and all have been hurt by the effects of homosexuality. The media and the Church must break its silence towards this enemy. If they do not, the people themselves must rise up and expose it..."
Quotes from "After the Ball" can be found here:
The Homosexual Propaganda and Media Manipulation Game
What Homosexuals Say About Homosexuals - Is This Gay Behavior Sick?
They were already doing this 40 years ago. When I was in high school, the speech teacher risked his job to put out the homosexual propaganda in class that Jesus and John the Evangelist were a gay couple. I heard this second-hand, since I wasn't in that class, but this is typical, not unusual. The urge to attack and upset moral heterosexuals has always been strong. It's the recrimination of the out-group: criminal, homosexual, dissident. They always have to make you the issue and will always lash out.
I'm worried about that too. I'm too sad to even think about it.
Thanks for the ping. Excellent question. Our small-town newspaper had a front page article on this, and how most of the locals are very upset with the direction their church has taken.
Homosexual Agenda Index |
Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search |
All FreeRepublic Bump Lists |
A simple freepmail is all it takes to subscribe or unsubscribe from my homosexual agenda ping list.
That's gotta be tough. I'll send some help in the form of prayer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.