To: ellery
Didn't the prosecutors in the O.J. case say the same thing?
2 posted on
08/06/2003 8:41:54 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
I don't remember, but this blustering attitude on the part of this DA can't be a good thing when one is going up against such power and money.
To: 1Old Pro
It all changes once a defense lawyer cross examines the prosecution witnesses and puts on his own experts.
6 posted on
08/06/2003 8:45:31 AM PDT by
MEG33
To: 1Old Pro
The prosecutors in the OJ case proved their case beyond a reasonable doubt. OJ basically had jury nullification of the evidence. If you are a Kobe fan, you better hope that the prosecutors don't present the same amount of evidence as was presented in the OJ case.
7 posted on
08/06/2003 8:45:56 AM PDT by
BushCountry
(To the last, I will grapple with Democrats. For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at Liberals.)
To: 1Old Pro
I wish the judge had not allowed TV cameras in the courtroom...the first thing I heard on turning FOX news on was an Eagle County guy saying what a great thing this has been for their economy and businesses! Maybe someone should wonder if the girl was bribed by the city leaders to set up Kobe in order to benefit the community! It's all sick, I tell you!
To: 1Old Pro
Didn't the prosecutors in the O.J. case say the same thing?
At least the jury pool won't come from South Central...
12 posted on
08/06/2003 8:48:52 AM PDT by
ErnBatavia
(Bumperootus!)
To: 1Old Pro
"Didn't the prosecutors in the O.J. case say the same thing?"What are the odds of having another inept judicial ringmaster like Judge Ito, and amateur lightweight prosecutors like Darden and Clark?
To: 1Old Pro
Didn't the prosecutors in the O.J. case say the same thing?Yes. And they had great evidence against him for anyone willing to look. But the jury wore blindfolds.
To: 1Old Pro
Well OJ should have been convicted-never know what a jury will do.
40 posted on
08/06/2003 9:03:39 AM PDT by
nyconse
To: 1Old Pro
The evidence was slam dunk in the OJ case--they just didn't realize they would have a jury that would ignore all of it.
75 posted on
08/06/2003 9:22:17 AM PDT by
beaversmom
(Celebrating May 5th and all days with an American Flag)
To: 1Old Pro
Yes, they did say that in the OJ case. And they did have a slam-dunk case. However, that jury might not have convicted OJ even if he had committed the crime right in front of them.
Kobe's case might well be a slam-dunk as to proof of rape. However, convicting a rich celebrity, especially one who can throw a ball through a hoop, is another matter. Look what the judge did in the Iverson case. And DeShawn Stevenson got probabtion and community service, no matter that it involved a 13 or 14 year old and her mother had his confession on tape.
76 posted on
08/06/2003 9:22:19 AM PDT by
Dante3
To: 1Old Pro
And now she is covering the Kobe case for E! Entertainment!
To: 1Old Pro
Didn't the prosecutors in the O.J. case say the same thing?And they were right!
To: 1Old Pro
When will Johnny Cochrane show up and take over the defense? Will he bring a glove and a biased LA detective to screw up the prosecution again? Can he bring along the OJ jury? If so, Kobe walks.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson