Skip to comments.
Steel Thyself, Karl Rove
WSJ Online ^
| 8/6/03
| Wall Street Journal
Posted on 08/06/2003 4:42:34 AM PDT by Texas_Dawg
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:49:36 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
After all George Bush has done for steel, the United Steelworkers of America yesterday returned the favor and endorsed Richard Gephardt for President. Call it more evidence, if any more were needed, that the Administration's decision to impose 30% tariffs on steel imports last year was a major economic and political blunder.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; endorsement; evil; gephardt; gwb2004; ingrate; protectionism; steel; tariffs; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: Texas_Dawg
Isn't it funny that Bush passed these steel tariffs and bloated farm subsidies yet you and I will probably still vote for him... Agriculture is apparently one of the only industries doing very well ------ so well it justifies a million indigents coming in from Mexico every year because that many jobs must be getting added. Health care is still doing well and it's certainly being subsidized. Also of course the Welfare agencies. And Education. Most of the jobs in this area are in health care, social work, and education ---all are subsidized by the federal government.
61
posted on
08/06/2003 5:17:05 PM PDT
by
FITZ
To: Alberta's Child
I'm no fan of those steel tariffs, but there's no disputing the fact that George W. Bush is now the president largely because he got a lot of votes among steelworkers in West Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee. Bumpity, bump!
To: Victoria Delsoul; Alberta's Child
I'm no fan of those steel tariffs, but there's no disputing the fact that George W. Bush is now the president largely because he got a lot of votes among steelworkers in West Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee.There really aren't that many steelworkers in those three states combined to even remotely effect a nat'l election.
63
posted on
08/06/2003 6:59:07 PM PDT
by
jla
To: jla; Victoria Delsoul
See my correction in #25.
Unless I am mistaken, the coal that is mined in the states of West Virginia, Tennessee and Kentucky is used primarily for coking in the steel production process.
To: jla
Yes, but every little bit helps. ;-)
To: Alberta's Child
Thanks AC, noted.
To: Victoria Delsoul
Not the first time I made a fool of myself in public. LOL.
To: Alberta's Child
Oh, c'mon! Be nice to yourself. :-)
Do you know that Actor Arnold Schwarzenegger is going to run? And you know what? He is going to win.
To: Victoria Delsoul
That announcement caught a lot of people by surprise. I wonder what was behind that whole story.
To: Alberta's Child
Some said that once Feinstein said no, it opened the doors to Arnold. I don't know if this is the case.
To: Victoria Delsoul
That's a good point. I didn't even think about that.
To: Alberta's Child
I didn't it either, LOL.
To: Alberta's Child; You Dirty Rats; Tokhtamish; Victoria Delsoul
I'm no fan of those steel tariffs, but there's no disputing the fact that George W. Bush is now the president largely because he got a lot of votes among steelworkers in West Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee.I don't know about KY and TV, but the main reason Bush won WV is because: 1) He actually came here, multiple times, to campaign, something that was absolutely unheard of in this state since JFK in 1960; 2) He was pro-gun and Gore was not.
To expand on what You Dirty Rats said, there really aren't that many steelworkers left in West Virginia either. Bush's steel position, combined with Clinton/Gore's general abandonment of the steelworkers, certainly helped, but there just aren't enough of them left for them alone to have given Bush the state.
73
posted on
08/06/2003 7:48:26 PM PDT
by
Timesink
To: Alberta's Child
I am actually taking a second look at tariffs. They seemed to serve our country well for the 19th and much of the 20th centuries.
74
posted on
08/06/2003 9:14:50 PM PDT
by
Burkeman1
((If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.))
To: FITZ
It doesn't matter who the unions support ---they always support the democrats ----what matters is that what Bush did for steel is apparently helping the economy ---because right after he did it, we got some nice reports of the economy doing a turn-around. You're joking, right? This is like the Democrats who say that Bill Clinton's tax increases created the stock market boom of the late 90s.
75
posted on
08/07/2003 3:29:25 AM PDT
by
Texas_Dawg
("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
To: Burkeman1
I don't have a problem with tariffs in general, but there's no way in hell I would support them under this country's current economic system. When we're already paying more than 50% of our income in various taxes anyway, tariffs will do nothing but reduce our standard of living by making things less affordable.
High taxes plus expensive products and services is a second-rate European-style economic system.
To: Texas_Dawg
Well ---- Bush decided to do that for steel and suddenly we got reports of the economy turning around and manufacturing orders going up. I think Bush wouldn't have done that if there wasn't some good reason for the economy to try something other than more "free trade".
77
posted on
08/07/2003 6:05:01 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: FITZ
Well ---- Bush decided to do that for steel and suddenly we got reports of the economy turning around and manufacturing orders going up. Suddenly? He did it nearly a year and a half ago... yet we have continued to see unemployment rise, not only in manufacturing (where we are inefficient), but also in other industries (punished by the tariffs on steel which affects numerous businesses). I think Bush wouldn't have done that if there wasn't some good reason for the economy to try something other than more "free trade".
Some good reason? Like... trying to gain votes?
78
posted on
08/07/2003 6:13:00 AM PDT
by
Texas_Dawg
("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
To: Texas_Dawg
Some good reason? Like... trying to gain votes? Or trying to turn around the poor economy. I keep seeing reports that joblessness claims are now down, so maybe what Bush did with steel is the right thing to do. Government subsidizes health care and agriculture and education---and you have to admit those are doing very very well as far as providing jobs.
79
posted on
08/07/2003 6:46:42 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: FITZ
Or trying to turn around the poor economy. I keep seeing reports that joblessness claims are now down, so maybe what Bush did with steel is the right thing to do. Government subsidizes health care and agriculture and education---and you have to admit those are doing very very well as far as providing jobs. Are you kidding? This is like saying that the stock market is up much higher on average (as it is) in years where the NFC team wins the Super Bowl than it is in years where the AFC team wins. Even if the government was responsible for the jobs in those sectors, who cares? That still says nothing about government subsidies being inefficient. The Cuban government has "created" nearly 100% of its country's jobs in agriculture, education, and health care as well.
80
posted on
08/07/2003 7:05:13 AM PDT
by
Texas_Dawg
("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson