Posted on 08/05/2003 7:13:36 AM PDT by RockChucker
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:36:55 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
She's a feminist. I am sure her beliefs about babies made the dirty deed a little easier.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I hate to say it on Free Republic, but as an atheist I think all religion is psychosis. I've just come to the conclusion that modern day American Christians are at least willing to fight for this country, and unlike Muslims and Marxists, won't kill me for refusing to get with their particular program, so I accord them the respect they are due on those counts.
But the fact remains that they believe in things that are, in fact, imaginary. This leaves them vulnerable to an advanced form of the insanity. It's funny, the average Protestant (at least, the ones I've known) believes there is a devil, but scoffs when someone says, "I'm possessed by him." Yet it's only an embellishment on the nonsense that he already believes in.
Atheism is a religion. Welcome to the club and here is your padded room and straitjacket.
But the fact remains that they believe in things that are, in fact, imaginary. This leaves them vulnerable to an advanced form of the insanity.
People who make statements like this clue the world in that they don't understand evidence or logic and have closed their eyes to knowledge in order to preserve their own arrogance. You think you sound intelligent when you are merely being childish.
Speaking as a Christian, it is hard not to be amused by your arrogant words. In order for you to make an absolute statement like you just did, you would have to be God yourself (possessing all knowledge, power, and presence). It is obvious you are none of those things. Therefore all you have done is make a meaningless assertion.
This woman committed murder, plain and simple. I don't care what nonsense she spouts about post-partum depression and all that psycho-babble. It's all about her. This is nothing more than damnable selfishness on her part. She deserves to be put to death for her crime.
Yes and wife beaters and killers are also suffering from some kind of psychosis and depression. Murder is murder, anyone who kills an infant or child should be given the death penalty. There is no excuse for murdering a totally helpless person.
LOL! No offense, but I won't be getting into it with you. I've long since figured out that Christians think God exists till you prove he doesn't (although, of course, they don't extend the logic to elves.) So trying to talk to them rationally about it is pointless. You just go ahead and live in that world, it's fine with me.
Nope. Sorry. You just revealed you have no idea what you're talking about.
If you have proven the non-existence of God you really must rush to the philosophy department of the nearest university, talk to the chairman, and get your discovery published in a peer reviewed journal pronto. Your accomplishment is unprecedented in the whole history of the world. Soon you'll be more famous than Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Anselm, Augustine, Aquinas, Descartes, Pascal, Spinoza, Newton, Liebniz, Locke, Hume, Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Marx, Nietzsche, Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Satre, Singer, Pinker, Dennett and all the other philosophers who have ever lived combined.
For such an arrogant, omniscient person, your skills of exposition are not very impressive.
I hadn't heard it, but if true it conforms pretty well with some speculation I offered in Post #73.
Nope. Sorry. You just revealed you have no idea what you're talking about.
So ruled the Supreme Court. If you actually bothered to think about the subject you would see why that ruling actually makes sense.
Ruling atheism to be just another belief system (which it is, since it relys on faith in the nonexistence of God) you prevent atheism from becoming a state religion. That is exactly the end of the ACLU jihad against religion. Preventing the establishment of atheism as the state religion protects the rights of the religious the same way as preventing Catholicism or Islam from such.
Your argument would hold if could truly be said that there were no more evidence in support of the existence of God than there was to support the existence of elves.
However, it is not at all that way. There actually IS evidence to consider which points to God's existence. Further, any argument which attempts to prove He doesn't exist can invariably be shown to be irrational. Therefore the burden of proof must fall on those who claim He doesn't exist.
It's like my leftie fellow grad students who, soaked in relativism, state eagerly, "Even not having an agenda is having an agenda!" It's B.S. of the first order. Imagine applying the same logic to other areas:
"Even lawlessness is a sort of law!"
"Even amorality is a sort of morality!"
"Even a lack of structure is a type of structure!"
"Even being illogical is following a certain logic!"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.