Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

School tests breach UN convention, envoy claims
http://education.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4711608,00.html ^ | July 14, 2003 | Will Woodward

Posted on 07/29/2003 6:49:37 AM PDT by attagirl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: attagirl
INTREP
21 posted on 07/29/2003 9:49:52 AM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
What does that mean?
22 posted on 07/29/2003 10:03:12 AM PDT by attagirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Take note of this link too:

http://www.ngo.org/links/index.htm#anchor81099

These are UN affiliated NGOs.

The NGO domain is hosted at this server:

http://www.iaed.org
23 posted on 07/29/2003 10:15:00 AM PDT by Calpernia (Runs with scissors.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: attagirl
LiteKeeper has a database he tracks info. He codes threads with codes such as that to know where to download and organize his info to.
24 posted on 07/29/2003 10:16:22 AM PDT by Calpernia (Runs with scissors.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: attagirl
http://www.freerepublic.com/~litekeeper/
25 posted on 07/29/2003 10:28:32 AM PDT by Coleus (God is Pro Life and Straight and gave an innate predisposition for self-preservation and protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: attagirl
Can someone please list reasons to not ratify the UN convention for the rights of the child. I've read it and there isn't anything that sounds potentially harmful to children. What am I missing?

Also, isn't is rather odd that only two countries haven't done so (one of them being the world most powerful, the other possibly the world's weakest)
26 posted on 07/29/2003 10:29:28 AM PDT by cc-cookies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc-cookies
Hi Cookie. I see your are new to FR. Welcome.

Do some searches in FR on NGO. See my links I posted on the orgs.

Here is a good intro to them: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/932303/posts
27 posted on 07/29/2003 10:33:25 AM PDT by Calpernia (Runs with scissors.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cc-cookies
Can someone please list reasons to not ratify the UN convention for the rights of the child.

Did you not read the article?

The UN thinks it knows better than local governments how to teach a child.

Would you sign a contract allowing me to control the education of your child?

28 posted on 07/29/2003 10:35:31 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: attagirl
I am a retired Army officer (artillery, MI, and chaplain). I have the privilege of teaching several classes in Colorado Springs to high school, college, and adults on comparative worldviews (biblical vs secular). As I read the various threads, some impress me as good for illustrating different worldviews. So, using some Army terminology, I mark "incidents" as "SPOTREPS" (spot report) and "descriptions of the current world scene" as "SITREPs" (situation reports). INTREP (Intelligence Report) provides information of an event involving those of the "opposition;" INTSUM (Intelligence Summary) provides more general information. When I get home, I download these SPOTREPs and SITREPs to a database for future use.

Does that help?

29 posted on 07/29/2003 12:17:28 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
I'm impressed that you are so active and ORGANIZED (not my forte). I thought I was missing out on some computer lingo. Thanks!
30 posted on 07/29/2003 12:21:35 PM PDT by attagirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
BUMP!!
31 posted on 07/29/2003 12:32:56 PM PDT by George Frm Br00klyn Park (FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: cc-cookies
"Can someone please list reasons to not ratify the UN convention for the rights of the child."
==================================
cc-c, The main one is that the Convention for the rights of the child states that, "No child shall be prevented from making associations with any of those whom the child chooses." {Paraphrased, but right on} Now, this in itself is a lie, because the U.N. bureaucrats WILL {DO} prevent children from associating with those the U.N. chooses. But, parents will NOT be able to make any choices in their children's associates. Do YOU want that for ANY child, let alone your own children?? Peace and love, George.
32 posted on 07/29/2003 12:46:18 PM PDT by George Frm Br00klyn Park (FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cc-cookies
Since you read the actual document and couldn't see a problem, go to eagleforum.org and do a search on their own site for the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child. Then re-read it in that light.

You need to read between the lines.

The fact that everyone's ratified it but 2 nations is no reason to go ahead with it.

The UN is anti-family and anti-God.

33 posted on 07/29/2003 1:40:29 PM PDT by attagirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: attagirl
And supported by H.H.H. Clinton (Her Heinous Highness).

Another reason to run her out instead of vote her in.

vaudine
34 posted on 07/29/2003 6:38:50 PM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: attagirl
In an interview with the Guardian, Katarina Tomasevski, special rapporteur on the right to education for the UN commission on human rights, said she believed the British government was in technical breach of the convention.

The Daily Telegraph has been running stories about the increasing number of politicians and teachers who send their children to private schools.

35 posted on 07/30/2003 12:31:54 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: attagirl
If comrade Tomasevski is not a member of the U.S. NEA they should make her an honorary member. She sounds like she'd fit right in.
36 posted on 08/01/2003 10:52:05 AM PDT by StopGlobalWhining (Vote Bush 04 - Extend "assault weapons" ban - Support Open Borders - UN Global Governance -Kyoto USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: attagirl
A crazed mob of diplomats angry at being made to wait for lunch because of striking restaurant workers rioted in U.N. cafeterias Friday and looted them of thousands of dollars in food, booze and silverware.

And we're supposed to ask these people for permission to take actions to defend our own national security?

37 posted on 08/01/2003 10:55:44 AM PDT by StopGlobalWhining (Vote Bush 04 - Extend "assault weapons" ban - Support Open Borders - UN Global Governance -Kyoto USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson