Posted on 07/29/2003 6:49:37 AM PDT by attagirl
As excessive as it it, the UNer's salary is barely adequate to maintain a luxurious and oppulent life style in NYC.
Any ultra-left wing America-hating, union teacher opposes objective targets for student because, over time, it demonstrates the differing results of different teachers and distinguishes between students who do well and students who do less well. The objective of the UN (and any who would see America fail) is that, at the end of the day when the student enters his/her home, the parent dosen't ask, "What did you learn in school today?," but, "How did school make you feel today?"
Not if I can help it!!
Article 29 says education should be "directed to the development of the child's personality, talents and mental and physical abilities to their fullest potential".Guys, Not EVEN one word about teaching the "children" to read, write, add, and subtract, and giving them the tools to think and come to rational conclusions based on their own abilities. The U.N. wants to TRAIN your kids to "be good citizens of the world." Dogs and horses are "trained", children used to be "educated" in the "three Rs". What passes for education today is EVIL!!!
====================================
Not to mention the fact that the U.N. does not want the "states" to "fulfil government objectives rather than meet the needs of children", as defined by the omniscient "educators" of the United Nations. PURE UNADULTERATED EVIL!!!
AND, it is already in United States of America's schools despite the fact that we are NOT signatories to "THE UN CONVENTION FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD". Peace and love, George..
So, we're very close.
This is one of those "shocking at first glance" statistics, but think about it - to a kid, which is more likely to happen, and therefore more to be worried about?? I think it's only common sense that they would be more worried about a test. Who the heck is going to worry about something that they think is never going to happen???
http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/74873.htm
May 4, 2003 -- A crazed mob of diplomats angry at being made to wait for lunch because of striking restaurant workers rioted in U.N. cafeterias Friday and looted them of thousands of dollars in food, booze and silverware.
"It was chaos, wild, something out of a war scene," an executive from the company taking over food services for the United Nations told Time magazine. "They took everything."
The food fight was sparked by an impromptu strike at the United Nations' five eateries.
Hungry diplomats were getting crabby, according to the magazine, so a high-ranking official ordered the cafeteria doors thrown open around 1 p.m. - and that's when all hell broke loose.
Two comments: 1. why was this suppressed and
2. George Bush signed on to UNESCO, the global school board wannabe
The dumbing down of the Western World and an end to Western Civilization, just what the Marxists want. The students in Singapore are among the brightest in the world those in England and the USA are what around 28th.
The UN Wants Control of YOUR Child
The UN and Abortion, Gun Rights, Land Rights, Education-Abortion and Children, their court and army, and Taxes
MASTERLINK TO FREE REPUBLIC EDUCATION THREADS (#6)
Free Republic links to education related articles (thread#7)
Free Republic links to education related articles (thread#8)
Deconstructing the Western Mind: Gramscian-Marxist Subversion of Faith and Education
Education Articles
Deconstructing the Western Mind: Gramscian-Marxist Subversion of Faith and Education
The "new world order" involves the elimination of the sovereignty and independence of nation-states and some form of world government. This means the end of the United States of America, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights as we now know them. Most of the new world order proposals involve the conversion of the United Nations and its agencies to a world government, complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, global taxation, and numerous other agencies to control every aspect of human life (education, nutrition, health care, population, immigration, communications, transportation, commerce, agriculture, finance, the environment, etc.). The various notions of the "new world order" differ as to details and scale, but agree on the basic principle and substance.
Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World (1931)
"... when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people ... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people."
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.